Method for Network-Coordinated Device-to-Device Communication

• US 20140148177A1
• Filed: 11/28/2012
• Published: 05/29/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 11/28/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: RATASUK, Rapeepat, GHOSH, Amitabha
• Application Number:
  US13/687,711
• Publication Number:
  US 20140148177A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 455/450
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/70 Services for machine-to-machine communication [M2M] or machine type communication [MTC]
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/02 Selection of wireless resources by user or terminal
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/04 Wireless resource allocation
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 92/18 between terminal devices

Abstract

Various communication systems may benefit from network coordination. For example, a system of the long term evolution (LTE) of the third generation partnership project (3GPP) that utilizes device-to-device communication may benefit from various methods, devices, and systems for network-coordinated device-to-device communication. For example, a method may include determining a penalty for using a subframe for device-to-device communication based on radio conditions. The method may also include applying the penalty in selecting radio resources for a user equipment for device-to-device communication.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

determining a penalty for using a resource for device-to-device communication based on performance metrics; and

applying the penalty in selecting radio resources for a user equipment for device-to-device communication.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the penalty comprises determining whether to use an uplink subframe or a downlink subframe for device to device communication based on a penalty function.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the penalty comprises determining the penalty based on at least one of radio conditions, system loading, priority, served throughput, buffer status, expected interference from device-to-device transmissions, resource block loading, traffic offloading efficiency, or signal to interference plus noise ratio.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the applying the penalty comprises selecting one of a plurality of alternative resources based on minimizing a penalty function.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

signaling a device-to-device region to a user equipment based on the selected radio resources.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the signaling comprises broadcasting a configuration message to a plurality of user equipment.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

scheduling around a device-to-device region by avoiding scheduling a user equipment near a pair of device-to-device user equipment in the region.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the applying the penalty comprises modifying a scheduling order and/or resource assignment for non-device-to-device users around device-to-device transmission.

9. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

using beamforming to steer around the device-to-device region corresponding to a pair of device-to-device user equipment.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the applying the penalty comprises adjusting either a power of a device-to-device user equipment or a non-device-to-device user equipment based on priority.

11. An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code,

wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to

determine a penalty for using a resource for device-to-device communication based on performance metrics; and

apply the penalty in selecting radio resources for a user equipment for device-to-device communication.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to apply the penalty at least by determining

whether to use an uplink subframe or a downlink subframe for device to device communication based on a penalty function.

13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to determine the penalty at least by determining the penalty based on at least one of radio conditions, system loading, priority, served throughput, buffer status, expected interference from device-to-device transmissions, resource block loading, traffic offloading efficiency, or signal to interference plus noise ratio.

14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to apply the penalty at least by selecting one of a plurality of alternative resources based on minimizing a penalty function.

15. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to signal a device-to-device region to a user equipment based on the selected radio resources.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to signal at least by broadcasting a configuration message to a plurality of user equipment.

17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to schedule around a device-to-device region by avoiding scheduling a user equipment near a pair of device-to-device user equipment in the region.

18. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to apply the penalty by modifying a scheduling order and/or resource assignment for non-device-to-device users around device-to-device transmission.

19. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to use beamforming to steer around the device-to-device region corresponding to a pair of device-to-device user equipment.

20. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to apply the penalty by adjusting either a power of a device-to-device user equipment or a non-device-to-device user equipment based on priority.

21. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed in hardware, perform a process, the process comprising:

determining a penalty for using a resource for device-to-device communication based on performance metrics; and

applying the penalty in selecting radio resources for a user equipment for device-to-device communication.