PROVIDING WORKFLOW PROCESSES TO CROWDSOURCED PRODUCT LISTINGS

• US 20140164049A1
• Filed: 12/11/2012
• Published: 06/12/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 12/11/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Product Funder Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Product Funder Incorporated
• Inventors: Yakos, David J., Sanford, Stephen M., Rudolph, Joby Rodell, Murphy, Ryan Peter
• Application Number:
  US13/711,446
• Publication Number:
  US 20140164049A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.27
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0633 Workflow analysis

Abstract

Systems and methods to provide a set of qualifying steps for a crowdsourced project during creation of the project, where the steps are coupled with cost calculators, medal awards, partner identification, and third party auditing. The systems and methods allow an efficient project entry method while also scoring the completeness of the project to potential funding users. The inclusion of stretch goals, added at any time during the creation or funding of a project allows dynamic adjustment of target funding levels and awards, providing incentives for increased funding. Described herein is a system and method to create crowdfunded projects along with quality control checks visible to funders and incentives to induce more funders and greater funding levels, at the same time as creating a higher project success rate.

Claims

1. A method in a workflow system, the method comprising:

receiving a project type for a project;

determining, at least in part based on the project type, a set of one or more steps of a workflow for the project;

determining one or more actions to complete the set of one or more steps of the workflow; and

determining, based at least in part on the one or more actions, a cost for the workflow.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising scoring the project based at least in part on a completeness of the workflow.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein scoring the project includes assigning one or more of a point value, a medal, or a badge based on the scoring of the project.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a recommendation for a goods or services provider for completing one or more steps in the workflow.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a level of knowledge of a user with respect to the set of one or more actions to complete one or more steps of the workflow.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving an indication that an audit of the project is desired; and

in response to receiving the indication that the audit of the project is desired;

providing a list of one or more auditors for selection,

receiving a selection of an auditor from the list, and

submitting an audit request to the selected auditor.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a specification of one or more stretch goals associated with the project; and

determining a cost associated with each of the one or more stretch goals.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the specification of the one or more stretch goals is received in response to determining that a funding rate for the project has exceeded a predetermined or configurable rate.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

determining that funding for the project has exceeded an original funding level;

in response to determining that funding for the project has exceeded the original funding level, determining if sufficient funding exists for at least one of the one or more stretch goals.

10. A machine-readable storage medium having machine executable instructions for causing one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving a project type for a project;

determining, at least in part based on the project type, a set of one or more steps of a workflow for the project;

determining one or more actions to complete the set of one or more steps of the workflow; and

determining, based at least in part on the one or more actions, a cost for the workflow.

11. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise scoring the project based at least in part on a completeness of the workflow.

12. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein scoring the project includes assigning one or more of a point value, a medal, or a badge based on the scoring of the project.

13. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise providing a recommendation for a goods or services provider for completing one or more steps in the workflow.

14. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise determining a level of knowledge of a user with respect to the set of one or more actions to complete one or more steps of the workflow.

15. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving an indication that an audit of the project is desired; and

in response to receiving the indication that the audit of the project is desired;

providing a list of one or more auditors for selection,

receiving a selection of an auditor from the list, and

submitting an audit request to the selected auditor.

16. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving a specification of one or more stretch goals associated with the project; and

determining a cost associated with each of the one or more stretch goals.

17. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the specification of the one or more stretch goals is received in response to determining that a funding rate for the project has exceeded a predetermined or configurable rate.

18. The machine-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the operations further comprise:

determining that funding for the project has exceeded an original funding level;

in response to determining that funding for the project has exceeded the original funding level, determining if sufficient funding exists for at least one of the one or more stretch goals.

19. A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

at least one machine readable storage medium communicably coupled to the one or more processors, the machine readable storage medium having machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to;

receive a project type for a project;

determine, at least in part based on the project type, a set of one or more steps of a workflow for the project;

determine one or more actions to complete the set of one or more steps of the workflow; and

determine, based at least in part on the one or more actions, a cost for the workflow.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the machine executable code further includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to score the project based at least in part on a completeness of the workflow.

21. The system of claim 19, wherein the machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to score the project includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to assign one or more of a point value, a medal, or a badge based on the score of the project.

22. The system of claim 19, wherein the machine executable code further includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to provide a recommendation for a goods or services provider for completing one or more steps in the workflow.

23. The system of claim 19, wherein the machine executable code further includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to determine a level of knowledge of a user with respect to the set of one or more actions to complete one or more steps of the workflow.

24. The system of claim 19, wherein the machine executable code further includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to:

receive an indication that an audit of the project is desired; and

in response to receipt of the indication that the audit of the project is desired;

provide a list of one or more auditors for selection,

receive a selection of an auditor from the list, and

submit an audit request to the selected auditor.

25. The system of claim 19, wherein the machine executable code further includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to:

receive a specification of one or more stretch goals associated with the project; and

determine a cost associated with each of the one or more stretch goals.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein the specification of the one or more stretch goals is received in response to a determination that a funding rate for the project has exceeded a predetermined or configurable rate.

27. The system of claim 25, wherein the machine executable code further includes machine executable code to cause the one or more processors to:

determine that funding for the project has exceeded an original funding level;

in response to the determination that funding for the project has exceeded the original funding level, determine if sufficient funding exists for at least one of the one or more stretch goals.