METHOD TO REDUCE ENGINE COMBUSTION AND HARMONIC NOISE FOR MISFIRE DETECTION

• US 20140172279A1
• Filed: 12/14/2012
• Published: 06/19/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 12/14/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Vitesco Technologies USA, LLC (INA-Holding Schaeffler GmbH & Co. KG)
• Original Assignee: Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. (Continental AG)
• Inventors: Lynch, Marvin L., Qiao, Ninsheng, Gilbert, Richard John, Gerlach, Keith
• Granted Patent: US 9,523,322 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/111
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2200/1015 Engines misfires
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/009 using means for generating position or synchronisation signals
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/1498 measuring engine roughness
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/2474 Characteristics of sensors
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 15/11 by detecting misfire

Abstract

A method and system for determining combustion and harmonic noise correction factors for current operating conditions corresponding to the actual vehicle and applying the combustion and harmonic noise correction factors to a sensor signal, thereby removing engine combustion and harmonic noise from the sensor signal and leaving a misfire data signal in the sensor signal.

Claims

1. A method to Reduce Engine Combustion and Harmonic Noise for Misfire Detection on a sensor signal in a vehicle comprising the steps of:

determining combustion and harmonic noise correction factors for current operating conditions of an engine corresponding to the actual vehicle;

applying the combustion and harmonic noise correction factors to a sensor signal, thereby removing engine combustion and harmonic noise from the sensor signal and leaving a misfire data signal in the sensor signal output.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of determining combustion and harmonic noise correction factors corresponding to the actual vehicle uses an advanced replicating learning process to determine said correction factors.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said advanced replicating learning process comprises the steps of:

determining new correction factors for said sensor signal in an initial learning region of engine operating conditions;

propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said initial learning region as learning correction factors;

using said learning correction factors to remove a portion of combustion and harmonic noise from said sensor signal when said engine begins operating in the adjacent learning region, thereby allowing a controller to isolate a misfire data signal and a noise signal from said sensor signal and to determine a new correction factors for said sensor signal in said adjacent engine operating region of said engine based on said data signal and said noise signal; and

repeating the steps of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said initial learning region as learning correction factors and using said learning correction factors to remove a portion of combustion and harmonic noise from said sensor signal when said engine begins operating in the adjacent learning region, thereby allowing a controller to isolate a misfire data signal and a noise signal from said sensor signal and to determine a new correction factors for said sensor signal in said adjacent engine operating region of said engine based on said data signal and said noise signal until correction factors corresponding to the actual vehicle are learned for each operating condition of the vehicle.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein said step of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said previous learning region as learning correction factors comprises propagating said correction factors from an initial low engine speed region through to a final high engine speed region.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein said step of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said previous learning region as a learning correction factors comprises propagating said correction factors from an initial low engine load region through to a final high engine load region.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said step of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said previous learning region as a learning correction factors further comprises propagating said correction factors from an initial low engine speed region through to a final high engine speed region.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein said step of determining a new correction factors for said sensor signal in said adjacent engine operating region of said engine based on said data signal and said noise signal comprises the steps of:

reading an engine cycle tooth delta time data set;

normalizing a tooth delta time from said engine cycle tooth delta time data set to create a normalized tooth delta time data set;

calculating a learning cycle tooth normalized delta time mean using said normalized tooth delta time data set, thereby determining combustion and harmonic noise correction factors for said sensor signal.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein said steps of reading an engine cycle tooth delta time data set and normalizing a tooth delta time from said engine cycle tooth delta time data set to create a normalized tooth delta time data set are reiterated through multiple engine cycles and said step of calculating a learning cycle tooth normalized delta time mean using said normalized tooth delta time data set, thereby determining combustion and harmonic noise correction factors for said sensor signal is performed using data from multiple engine cycles, thereby determining a more robust combustion and harmonic correction factors.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of inverting the determined combustion and harmonic correction factors, thereby allowing the controller to divide an incoming sensor signal by multiplying inverted correction factors which are combustion and harmonic correction factors

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of applying the combustion and harmonic noise correction factors to a sensor signal, thereby removing engine combustion and harmonic noise from the sensor signal and leaving a misfire data signal in the sensor signal further comprises:

a controller receiving a raw sensor signal; and

applying said determined correction factors to said raw sensor signal by dividing said raw sensor signal by said correction factors, thereby removing engine combustion and harmonic noise from said correction factors and leaving a clean data signal.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein said sensor signal is a crank tooth sensor signal representative of an engine cylinder misfire cycle.

12. A vehicle comprising:

an internal combustion engine;

an engine controller comprising a memory and a processor, wherein said memory stores instructions operable to cause said engine controller to perform the steps of;

determining a combustion and harmonic noise correction factors for current operating conditions corresponding to the actual vehicle using an advanced replicated learning process;

applying the combustion and harmonic noise correction factors to a sensor signal, thereby removing engine harmonic noise from the sensor signal and leaving a data signal in the sensor signal.

13. The vehicle of claim 12, wherein said advanced replicating learning process comprises the steps of:

determining a new correction factors for said sensor signal in an initial learning region of engine operating conditions;

propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said initial learning region as a set of learning correction factors;

using said learning correction factors to remove a portion of combustion and harmonic noise from said sensor signal when said engine begins operating in the adjacent learning region, thereby allowing a controller to isolate a misfire data signal and a noise signal from said sensor signal and to determine a new correction factors for said sensor signal in said adjacent engine operating region of said engine based on said data signal and said noise signal; and

repeating the steps of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said initial learning region as learning correction factors and using said learning correction factors to remove a portion of combustion and harmonic noise from said sensor signal when said engine begins operating in the adjacent learning region, thereby allowing a controller to isolate a misfire data signal and a noise signal from said sensor signal and to determine new correction factors for said sensor signal in said adjacent engine operating region of said engine based on said data signal and said noise signal until correction factors corresponding to the actual vehicle are learned for each operating condition of the vehicle.

14. The vehicle of claim 13, wherein said step of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said previous learning region as learning correction factors comprises propagating said correction factors from an initial low engine speed region through to a final high engine speed region.

15. The vehicle of claim 13, wherein said step of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said previous learning region as learning correction factors comprises propagating said correction factors from an initial low engine load region through to a final high engine load region.

16. The vehicle of claim 15, wherein said step of propagating said new correction factors for said sensor signal to an adjacent learning region adjacent to said previous learning region as learning correction factors further comprises propagating said correction factors from an initial low engine speed region through to a final high engine speed region.

17. The vehicle of claim 13, wherein said step of determining new correction factors for said sensor signal in said adjacent engine operating region of said engine based on said data signal and said noise signal comprises the steps of:

reading an engine cycle tooth delta time data set;

normalizing a tooth delta time from said engine cycle tooth delta time data set to create a normalized tooth delta time data set;

calculating a learning cycle tooth normalized delta time mean using said normalized tooth delta time data set, thereby determining a harmonic noise correction factors for said sensor signal.

18. The vehicle of claim 17, wherein said steps of reading an engine cycle tooth delta time data set and normalizing a tooth delta time from said engine cycle tooth delta time data set to create a normalized tooth delta time data set are reiterated through multiple engine cycles and said step of calculating a learning cycle tooth normalized delta time mean using said normalized tooth delta time data set, thereby determining combustion and harmonic noise correction factors for said sensor signal is performed using data from all of said engine cycles, thereby determining a more robust combustion and harmonic correction factors.

19. The vehicle of claim 17, further comprising the step of inverting the determined combustion and harmonic correction factors, thereby allowing the controller to divide an incoming sensor signal by multiplying by the inverted correction factors which are combustion and harmonic correction factors.

20. The vehicle of claim 12, wherein said step of applying the combustion and harmonic noise correction factors to a sensor signal, thereby removing engine combustion and harmonic noise from the sensor signal and leaving a data signal in the sensor signal further comprises:

a controller receiving a raw sensor signal; and

applying said determined correction factors to said raw sensor signal by dividing said raw sensor signal by said correction factors, thereby removing engine combustion and harmonic noise from said correction factors and leaving a clean data signal.

21. The vehicle of claim 12, wherein said sensor signal is a crank tooth sensor signal representative of an engine cylinder misfire cycle.