Power Difference Between SCell and PCell in a Carrier Aggregation System

• US 20140192663A1
• Filed: 03/30/2012
• Published: 07/10/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 04/06/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Esa Malkamaki
• Inventors: Rosa, Claudio, Vasenkari, Petri, Koskela, Jarkko T., Nielsen, Sari, Malkamki, Esa, Alanen, Olli
• Application Number:
  US14/009,915
• Publication Number:
  US 20140192663A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/252
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 17/354 Adjacent channel leakage power
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 24/02 Arrangements for optimising operational condition
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/16 Deriving transmission power values from another channel
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/244 Interferences in heterogeneous networks, e.g. among macro and femto or pico cells or other sector / system interference [OSI]
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/30 using constraints in the total amount of available transmission power

Abstract

In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, a method is disclosed. Determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC. In response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and

in response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

2. The method according to claim 1, in which the first CC is one of a primary CC and a secondary CC, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC and the secondary CC.

3. The method according to claim 2, in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a difference in received or transmitted power between the primary CC and the second CC.

4. The method according to claim 2, in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a power difference needed for the first or the second CC so that reception on the first CC is no longer degraded beyond an image tolerance threshold due to image interference caused by the second CC.

5. The method according to claim 3, in which the quantitative power difference comprises at least one of:

RSRP difference;

RSRQ difference; and

network transmit power difference; and

the interference is image interference.

6. The method according to claim 2, the method further comprising:

after arranging the UL signaling, one of suspending measurements on the secondary CC or deconfiguring the secondary CC.

7. The method according to claim 1, in which the method is executed by a user equipment and the determining that downlink reception on the first CC is degraded due to interference caused by the second CC is based on an image tolerance threshold specific to the user-equipment.

8. The method according to claim 1, in which the determining that downlink reception on the first CC is degraded due to interference caused by the second CC is based on an absolute threshold provided by the network, the absolute threshold for one of RSRP, RSPQ, CQI or SNIR.

9. A method comprising:

determining that a power difference among first and second CCs exceeds a tolerance threshold, in which the tolerance threshold is specific for a user equipment; and

in response to the determining, arranging uplink signaling to inform a network at least that the tolerance threshold was exceeded.

10. The method according to claim 9, in which the first CC is one of a primary CC/PCell and a secondary CC/SCell, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC/PCell and the secondary CC/SCell.

11. The method according to claim 10, in which the uplink signaling comprises a bit whose value informs the network that the tolerance threshold was exceeded.

12. The method of claim 10, in which the UL signaling is further arranged to inform the network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and to further identify which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

13. The method according to claim 12, in which the quantitative power difference comprises at least one of:

RSRP difference;

RSRQ difference; and

network transmit power difference.

14. The method according to claim 9, in which the uplink signaling comprises, for each of the first and second CCs, values of at least one of:

measured RSRP, measured RSRQ, calculated transmit power, and CQI.

15. The method according to claim 9, in which the uplink signaling comprises a power change needed for the first or the second CC so that the power difference would no longer exceed the threshold.

16. An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code

the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following;

determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and

in response to the determining, arranging UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power.

17. The apparatus according to claim 16, in which the first CC is one of a primary CC and a secondary CC, and the second CC is the other of the primary CC and the secondary CC.

18. The apparatus according to claim 17, in which the quantitative power difference is informed in the UL signaling as a difference in received or transmitted power between the primary CC and the second CC.

19. A computer program, comprising:

code for determining that downlink reception on a first CC is degraded due to interference caused by a second CC; and

code for arranging, in response to the determining, UL signaling to inform a network of a quantitative power difference between the first and the second CC and further identifying which of the first or second CCs exhibits a higher power;

when the computer program is run on a processor.

20. The computer program according to claim 19, wherein the computer program is a computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer.