ASSESSING PRACTITIONER VALUE IN MULTI-PRACTITIONER SETTINGS

• US 20140195260A1
• Filed: 12/30/2013
• Published: 07/10/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 12/06/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Company Limited (ByteDance Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Hu, Jianying, Wang, Fei, Sorrentino, Robert K., Ebadollahi, Shahram
• Application Number:
  US14/143,197
• Publication Number:
  US 20140195260A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06398 Performance of employee with respect to a job function
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/20 for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/30 for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/70 for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients
• CPC Class Codes: G16Z 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass

Abstract

A plurality of actual outcome data points, including actual outcomes for a plurality of episodes of a process, are obtained for the process. A practitioner-independent baseline outcome is also obtained for the process. For each given one of the actual outcome data points, the given one of the actual outcome data points is equated to the practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome multiplied by a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices for each of a plurality of participating practitioner entities. Each of the participating practitioner entity outcome indices is raised to an exponent including a corresponding one of a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity type indices, to obtain a plurality of equations. The plurality of equations are solved to obtain estimated values of the unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and estimated values of the unknown participating practitioner entity type indices.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

utilizing a memory and at least one processor coupled to said memory to perform a method comprising;

obtaining a plurality of actual outcome data points comprising actual outcomes for a plurality of episodes of a professional team process applied to one or more situations;

obtaining a practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process, wherein said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome represents the expected outcome for a situation;

for each given one of said actual outcome data points, equating said given one of said actual outcome data points to said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome multiplied by a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices for each of a plurality of participating practitioner entities, each of said participating practitioner entity outcome indices being raised to an exponent comprising a corresponding one of a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity type indices, to obtain a plurality of equations, wherein;

the practitioner entity outcome indices comprise an indication of the performance level of a practitioner with regard to a specific outcome;

the practitioner entity type indices comprises an indication of the degree of impact of a particular practitioner type; and

solving said plurality of equations to obtain estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices to provide a Practitioner Value Assessment Tool, configured to rate and rank participating practitioners individually or in groups in their contribution to an outcome of a professional team process, where each individual participating practitioner has a different skill set and contributes to a different part of the professional team process.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein, in said equating step, said participating practitioner entities comprise human practitioners.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising evaluating performance of said practitioner entities based on said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining of said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process comprises carrying out a regression wherein actual process outcomes comprise a dependent variable and with a plurality of independent variables comprising non-practitioner-entity specific factors associated with said process.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said obtaining of said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process comprises averaging over all of said episodes with common non-practitioner-entity specific factors.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein, in said equating step, at least one of said participating practitioner entities comprises a team of human practitioners.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein at least some of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices have a value other than unity, and wherein said solving step comprises applying a double linear regression.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein all of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices are taken, a priori, as unity, and wherein said solving step comprises applying a single linear regression.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising obtaining an additional plurality of actual outcome data points comprising additional actual outcomes for a plurality of additional episodes of said process;

and repeating said equating and solving steps based on said additional actual outcomes, to update said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising stratifying said episodes prior to said equating and solving steps.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a system, wherein the system comprises distinct software modules, each of the distinct software modules being embodied on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, and wherein the distinct software modules comprise a database module, a multiplicative regression model formulation engine module, and a regression engine module;

wherein;

said obtaining of said practitioner-independent baseline outcome is carried out at least by querying said database module, said database module executing on said at least one processor;

said obtaining of said plurality of actual outcome data points is carried out by querying said database module executing on said at least one processor;

said equating step is carried out by said multiplicative regression model formulation engine module executing on said at least one processor; and

said solving step is carried out by said regression engine module executing on said at least one processor.

12. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, said computer readable program code configured to cause a processor to perform a method comprising:

obtaining a plurality of actual outcome data points comprising actual outcomes for a plurality of episodes of a professional team process applied to one or more situations;

obtaining a practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process, wherein said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome represents the expected outcome for a situation;

for each given one of said actual outcome data points, equating said given one of said actual outcome data points to said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome multiplied by a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices for each of a plurality of participating practitioner entities, each of said participating practitioner entity outcome indices being raised to an exponent comprising a corresponding one of a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity type indices, to obtain a plurality of equations, wherein;

the practitioner entity outcome indices comprise an indication of the performance level of a practitioner with regard to a specific outcome;

the practitioner entity type indices comprises an indication of the degree of impact of a particular practitioner type; and

solving said plurality of equations to obtain estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices to provide a Practitioner Value Assessment Tool, configured to rate and rank participating practitioners individually or in groups in their contribution to an outcome of a professional team process, where each individual participating practitioner has a different skill set and contributes to a different part of the professional team process.

13. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein, in said equating, said participating practitioner entities comprise human practitioners.

14. The computer program product of claim 12, further comprising computer readable program code configured to cause said processor to evaluate performance of said practitioner entities based on said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices.

15. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein said obtaining of said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process comprises carrying out a regression wherein actual process outcomes comprise a dependent variable and with a plurality of independent variables comprising non-practitioner-entity specific factors associated with said process.

16. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein said obtaining of said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process comprises averaging over all of said episodes with common non-practitioner-entity specific factors.

17. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein, in said computer readable program code configured to cause said processor to equate, at least one of said participating practitioner entities comprises a team of human practitioners.

18. An apparatus comprising:

a memory; and

at least one processor, coupled to said memory, and operative to;

obtain a plurality of actual outcome data points comprising actual outcomes for a plurality of episodes of a professional team process applied to one or more situations;

obtain a practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process, wherein said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome represents the expected outcome for a situation;

for each given one of said actual outcome data points, equate said given one of said actual outcome data points to said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome multiplied by a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices for each of a plurality of participating practitioner entities, each of said participating practitioner entity outcome indices being raised to an exponent comprising a corresponding one of a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity type indices, to obtain a plurality of equations, wherein;

the practitioner entity outcome indices comprise an indication of the performance level of a practitioner with regard to a specific outcome;

the practitioner entity type indices comprises an indication of the degree of impact of a particular practitioner type; and

solve said plurality of equations to obtain estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices to provide a Practitioner Value Assessment Tool, configured to rate and rank participating practitioners individually or in groups in their contribution to an outcome of a professional team process, where each individual participating practitioner has a different skill set and contributes to a different part of the professional team process.

19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein said participating practitioner entities comprise human practitioners.

20. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein said at least one processor is further operative to evaluate performance of said practitioner entities based on said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and said estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices.

21. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising a plurality of distinct software modules, each of the distinct software modules being embodied on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, and wherein the distinct software modules comprise a database module, a multiplicative regression model formulation engine module, and a regression engine module:

wherein;

said at least one processor is operative to obtain said practitioner-independent baseline outcome at least by querying said database module, said database module executing on said at least one processor;

said at least one processor is operative to obtain said plurality of actual outcome data points at least by querying said database module, said database module executing on said at least one processor;

said at least one processor is operative to equate said given one of said actual outcome data points to said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome multiplied by said plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices for each of said plurality of participating practitioner entities, by executing said multiplicative regression model formulation engine module; and

said at least one processor is operative to solve said plurality of equations by executing said regression engine module.

22. An apparatus comprising:

means for obtaining a plurality of actual outcome data points comprising actual outcomes for a plurality of episodes of a professional team process applied to one or more situations;

means for obtaining a practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome for said process, wherein said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome represents the expected outcome for a situation;

means for, for each given one of said actual outcome data points, equating said given one of said actual outcome data points to said practitioner entity-independent baseline outcome multiplied by a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices for each of a plurality of participating practitioner entities, each of said participating practitioner entity outcome indices being raised to an exponent comprising a corresponding one of a plurality of unknown participating practitioner entity type indices, to obtain a plurality of equations, wherein;

the practitioner entity outcome indices comprise an indication of the performance level of a practitioner with regard to a specific outcome;

the practitioner entity type indices comprises an indication of the degree of impact of a particular practitioner type; and

means for solving said plurality of equations to obtain estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity outcome indices and estimated values of said unknown participating practitioner entity type indices to provide a Practitioner Value Assessment Tool, configured to rate and rank participating practitioners individually or in groups in their contribution to an outcome of a professional team process, where each individual participating practitioner has a different skill set and contributes to a different part of the professional team process.