UNIT UNDER TEST AUTOMATION

• US 20140215268A1
• Filed: 01/28/2013
• Published: 07/31/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 01/28/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Oh, Sung, Larsen, Niels E., Yeo, Bema, Jemiolo, John, Hunter, Craig
• Application Number:
  US13/751,353
• Publication Number:
  US 20140215268A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/27
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/263 Generation of test inputs, e.g. test vectors, patterns or sequences ; with adaptation of the tested hardware for testability with external testers

Abstract

Unit under test automation can include receiving information relating to a system architecture, determining a number of modules to execute within a test executive, and implementing a unit under test utilizing the number of determined modules.

Claims

1. A method for unit under test automation, comprising:

receiving information relating to a system architecture;

determining a number of modules to execute within a test executive based on the received information; and

implementing a unit under test utilizing the number of determined modules.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein information relating to the system architecture includes determining hardware features of the system architecture.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the number of modules includes selecting modules to test the determined hardware features of the system architecture.

4. The method of claim 1, comprising logging unit under test data utilizing a database server connected to the test executive.

5. The method of claim 1, comprising implementing a number of enhancements to the test executive and load provider.

6. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a set of instructions executable by a processor to cause a computer to:

detect a number of hardware features relating to a system architecture;

determine a number of modules to execute within a test executive based on the number of hardware features; and

implement a unit under test of the number of hardware features utilizing the number of determined modules.

7. The medium of claim 6, wherein the test executive includes modules for a number of possible system architectures.

8. The medium of claim 6, wherein the test executive includes a number of support servers.

9. The medium of claim 6, wherein the number of support servers include a distributed file system server and a database system server.

10. The medium of claim 6, wherein the test executive is connected to a status update monitor for providing a unit under test status for a user.

11. The medium of claim 6, wherein the test executive receives diagnostic information from an operational system architecture.

12. A system for threat exchange information protection, the system comprising a processing resource in communication with a non-transitory computer readable medium, wherein the non-transitory computer readable medium includes a set of instructions and wherein the processing resource is designed to carry out the set of instructions to:

detect a number of hardware features relating to an operational system architecture;

determine a number of modules to execute within a test executive based on the number of hardware features;

implement a unit under test of the number of hardware features utilizing the number of determined modules;

generate unit under test status logs; and

provide real time status updates of the unit under test to a user.

13. The computing system of claim 12, wherein the unit under test status logs are stored in a distributed file system server and used to provide the real time status updates and testing control via a web interface.

14. The computing system of claim 12, wherein the number of modules are determined based on an architecture of the number of hardware features.

15. The computing system of claim 12, wherein the unit under test status logs are stored in a first database and the real time status updates are stored in a second database.