Positive Train Control Using Autonomous Systems

• US 20140218482A1
• Filed: 02/05/2013
• Published: 08/07/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 02/05/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: John H. Prince
• Original Assignee: John H. Prince
• Inventors: Prince, John H.
• Application Number:
  US13/759,390
• Publication Number:
  US 20140218482A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 348/47
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 23/041 Obstacle detection
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 29/30 Supervision, e.g. monitoring arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 29/32 Timing, e.g. advance warning of approaching train
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 7/181 for receiving images from a plurality of remote sources

Abstract

The use of widely separated and coordinated cameras allows trains to recognize obstructions and calculate distance to them to a degree which enables them to react quickly and brake early enough to avoid accidents. This applies to hazards such as fallen trees, stalled cars, people, and other trains on the rails. The system can also apply to crossings, enabling them to see approaching trains and gauge their distance, velocity, and deceleration, so that they can be shut down early and alarms sounded immediately. These systems are autonomous, using software which allows trains to know exactly where they are and at what speed they are travelling independently of external signals, including GPS, allowing a measure of safety beyond normal communications. These systems can also work in the infra-red, allowing compensation for fog and rain.

Claims

1. A passive method of calculating parameters of fixed or moving objects relative to a fixed or moving reference comprising the steps of:

a. deploying a plurality of detection means for said reference to observe said objects;

b. recognizing said objects individually or collectively as being of concern to said reference;

c. coordinating said plurality of detection means so that data in meaningful form is returned to a processor of said reference for computing the parameters of relative motion between said objects of concern individually or collectively and said reference;

d. computing with said processor of said reference parameters such as trajectory, velocity, acceleration or deceleration, and future position of said objects, relative to said reference.

2. The method as in claim 1 wherein said deployment of said detection means is in a generally a forward looking direction towards the anticipated position of said objects of concern.

3. The method as in claim 1 wherein the coordination of said detection means are steps of:

a. closely aligning said imaging devices by means of physical manipulation;

b. finely aligning said imaging devices by means of image matching software; and

c. enabling, if and as necessary, the visualization of images of said objects of concern in three dimensions, i.e. 3D.

4. The method as in claim 1 for said reference to recognize an individual object, or several objects, as:

a. stationary in a place where it or they may interfere with the motion of said reference;

or

b. moving in such a manner as to be a potential hazard to said reference.

5. The method as in claim 1 wherein said reference may recognize said objects as people, trees, stalled vehicles, other trains or any other objects on or near the tracks.

6. The method as in claim 1 wherein said processor may compute said parameters of trajectory, velocity, acceleration or deceleration, and future position of said objects as being potentially hazardous to said reference.

7. The method as in claim 1 wherein the computations of said processor may cause it to activate defensive measures in a reference such as setting a train'"'"'s brakes or closing down a level crossing.

9. The system as in claim 7 wherein said viewing devices are pairs of cameras coordinated to work in 3D.

10. The system as in claim 7 wherein the separation of said coordinated viewing devices is such as to maximize the visual acuity of the system.

11. The system as in claim 7 wherein the separation of said coordinated viewing devices is generally in a horizontal plane to provide optimal viewing of said objects of concern.

12. The system as in claim 7 wherein another optimal viewing sense may be in the vertical plane in the case of a train.

13. The system as in claim 7 wherein viewing senses may be at multiple angles

14. The system as in claim 7 wherein said means of processing information may coordinate with a means of reading the tracks to determine a train'"'"'s precise location.

15. The system as in claim 7 wherein the viewing, processing, deciding and activating on information received is autonomous for said reference.

16. The system as in claim 7 wherein said reference may communicate said viewing, processing, deciding and activating to said objects of concern or to a central office or elsewhere.

17. The system as in claim 7 wherein said information may be processed quickly and efficiently through use of fast algorithms.

18. The system as in claim 7 wherein said viewing, processing, deciding and activating can be accomplished in less than half a second.

19. The system as in claim 7 wherein said activation on a train can be accomplished independently of an operator and of a central office and many times faster, potentially saving rolling stock, goods, the environment and lives.

20. The system as in claim 7 wherein a crossing can shut itself down independently of slower or less accurate information from other systems.

8. A viewing system comprising:

a. a pair or more of coordinated viewing devices;

b. a means of processing information received from said viewing devices;

c. a means of deciding, within said processing means and based on information received, that action is necessary; and

d. a means of activating defensive measures when action is necessary