Methods and System for Monitoring Computer Users

• US 20140222995A1
• Filed: 02/07/2013
• Published: 08/07/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 02/07/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Arizona Board of Regents (University of Arizona)
• Original Assignee: Arizona Board of Regents (University of Arizona)
• Inventors: Razden, Anshuman, Femiani, John
• Application Number:
  US13/762,306
• Publication Number:
  US 20140222995A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/02 of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student

Abstract

A method and system are provided for monitoring an online activity to be performed by a user of a user computer. A trigger program runs on the user computer to detect possible violations by the user of predefined rules associated with the online activity. The trigger program is configured to analyze multiple streams of data collected by the user computer during the activity. The analyzed data is automatically annotated to assist in determine whether a violation of the predefined rules occurred. The analyzed data is stored for reviewed after the activity. Each trigger program can be activated in response to at least one of: video information about the activity, facial recognition information about the user, audio information about the activity, keystroke information relating to the user computer and the browsing history of the user computer during the activity.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring an online activity to be performed by a user of a user computer, the method comprising:

using a trigger program running on the user computer to detect possible violations by the user of predefined rules associated with the online activity, wherein the trigger program is configured to analyze one or more streams of data collected by the user computer during the activity;

automatically annotating the analyzed data to assist in determining whether a violation of the predefined rules occurred; and

storing on another computer a portion of the data collected by the user computer during the activity, wherein the stored data can be reviewed after the activity to assist in determining with whether a violation of the predefined rules occurred during the activity.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising performing a check of the user computer configuration before the online activity begins.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the online activity comprises taking an examination.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the online activity comprises attending an online educational presentation.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more streams of data include at least one of a video clip acquired from a camera coupled to the user computer, a recording of the user computer'"'"'s desktop, an audio clip, keystroke data, clipboard data and browsing history information captured by the user computer.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the trigger program is activated in response to a predefined pattern of keystrokes made on the user computer.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the trigger program is activated in response to data captured by a clipboard of the user'"'"'s computer changing.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of automatically prioritizing the analyzed data occurs before the step of storing the data collected by the user computer during the activity.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of automatically prioritizing the analyzed data occurs after the step of storing the data collected by the user computer during the activity.

10. A method for monitoring an online examination to be taken by a student using a student computer, the method comprising:

receiving data associated with an online examination attempt,

wherein the received data has been captured using a trigger program running on the student computer for detecting possible violations by the student of predefined rules associated with the online examination,

wherein the trigger program is configured to analyze one or more streams of data collected by the student computer during the examination,

wherein the received data comprises a portion of the data collected and is automatically prioritized by the student computer during the examination; and

storing the received data in a storage medium for review after the examination for determining whether a violation of the predefined rules occurred during the examination.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising performing a check of the student computer configuration before the examination begins.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the one or more streams of data include at least one of a video clip acquired from a camera coupled to the student computer, a recording of the student computer'"'"'s desktop, an audio clip, keystroke data, clipboard data and browsing history information captured by the student computer.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the trigger program is activated in response to a predefined pattern of keystrokes made on the user computer.

14. The method of claim 10 wherein the trigger program is activated in response to data in a clipboard of the user computer being changed.

15. The method of claim 10 wherein the stored data is used to determine whether the student cheated on the examination.

16. The method of claim 10 wherein the received data is automatically prioritized for presentation on a timeline.

17. A system for reviewing a recording of an online examination that was attempted by a student, the system comprising:

a storage medium for storing data associated with an examination attempt, wherein the stored data is collected from a plurality of data streams using a trigger program running on a student computer for detecting possible violations by the student of predefined rules associated with the examination attempt; and

a proctor computer operative with the storage medium for presenting the stored data for review after the examination attempt for determining whether the student violated any of the predefined rules during the examination attempt;

wherein the trigger program is configured to analyze the plurality of data streams during the examination attempt and to automatically identify portions of the data as one or more incident to assist in determining whether the student violated any of the predefined rules during the examination attempt; and

wherein the stored data comprises a portion of the data collected from the plurality of data streams.

18. The system of claim 17 wherein the trigger program is activated in response to at least one of:

video information about the examination attempt;

facial recognition information about the student

audio information about the examination attempt;

keystroke information relating to the examination attempt; and

a browsing history of the student during the examination attempt.

19. The system of claim 17 further including means for a proctor can view the stored data, including skipping past portions of the data that is not identified as an incident.

20. The system of claim 17 further including means for a proctor to hide or display incidents based on data associated with the incident;

and then skip past incidents that are hidden.