FORKLIFT SCALE, LOAD CELL AND METHOD OF MEASURING A FORKLIFT LOAD

• US 20140262551A1
• Filed: 03/14/2014
• Published: 09/18/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Larry D. Santi
• Original Assignee: Larry D. Santi
• Inventors: Santi, Larry D.
• Granted Patent: US 9,464,930 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 177/1
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/083 lift truck scale
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/12 having electrical weight-sensitive devices
• CPC Class Codes: G01L 1/2218 the supports being of the column type, e.g. cylindric, adapted for measuring a force along a single direction

Abstract

A forklift scale to measure a load carried by a pair of forks of a forklift that includes a fork carriage to movably position the forks is provided along with a method to measure the load. The forklift scale may include a base coupleable to a fork carriage, a fork support system to receive the pair of forks, and a plurality of load cells configured to deform elastically in response to a load carried by the forks. The method to measure the load carried by the forks may include obtaining signals from the load cells and processing the signals to obtain a load value indicative of a load shared by the pair of forks. Other related forklift scales, load cells therefor and methods of measuring a forklift load are also provided.

Claims

1. A forklift scale to measure a load carried by a pair of forks of a forklift that includes a fork carriage to movably position the forks, the forklift scale comprising:

a base coupleable to the fork carriage;

a fork support system to receive the pair of forks; and

a plurality of load cells coupled between the base and the fork support system with a horizontal reference plane of each load cell generally parallel to a load receiving surface of each fork, each load cell comprising a structural member having an aperture extending therethrough which defines at least one pair of offset strain gauge mounting surfaces that are parallel to the horizontal reference plane.

2. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein each load cell is configured to deform elastically in response to a load carried by the forks when using the forklift scale, and wherein each load cell further comprises an arrangement of strain gauges to sense deformations at least at one or more locations on the at least one pair of offset strain gauge mounting surfaces thereof.

3. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein, for each load cell, the aperture defines an upper strain gauge mounting surface and a lower strain gauge mounting surface that are each parallel to the horizontal reference plane and that each include a surface normal directed toward the horizontal reference plane.

4. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein the aperture is I-shaped and extends completely through a width of the structural member of the load cell.

5. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein, for each load cell, the aperture extends through a width of the structural member to define at least one thin-walled structural portion adjacent to the aperture.

6. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein the structural member of each load cell includes at least one thin-walled structural portion with opposing surfaces that are generally parallel to the horizontal reference plane thereof.

7. The forklift scale of claim 6 wherein each load cell further comprises a plurality of strain gauges, and wherein, for each load cell, at least some of the strain gauges are located on the at least one thin-walled structural portion thereof.

8. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein the structural member of each load cell includes a plurality of distinct apertures extending through a width therewith in series to define at least one thin-walled structural portion between the apertures.

9. The forklift scale of claim 1 wherein the plurality of load cells includes an upper set of load cells and a lower set of load cells, a respective one of the upper set of loads cells and a respective one of the lower set of load cells defining a load cell pair.

10. The forklift scale of claim 9 wherein at least one load cell pair includes strain gauges in electrical communication with each other to generate a supplemental correction signal indicative of the position of the load along a length of the forks during use.

11. The forklift scale of claim 10 wherein the strain gauges in electrical communication with each other to generate the supplemental correction signal include at least one strain gauge attached to the load cell from the upper set of load cells and at least one strain gauge attached to the load cell from the lower set of load cells.

12. A load cell of a forklift scale for measuring at least a portion of a load carried by forks of a forklift, the load cell comprising:

a structural member having a pair of external strain gauge mounting surfaces and having an aperture extending therethrough that defines at least one pair of internal strain gauge mounting surfaces that are parallel to a horizontal reference plane; and

an arrangement of strain gauges to sense deformations at least at one or more locations on the at least one pair of offset strain gauge mounting surfaces, the arrangement including

a first bridge arrangement of strain gauges including one pair of strain gauges mounted on one of the external strain gauge mounting surfaces and one pair of strain gauges mounted on the other one of the external strain gauge mounting surfaces; and

a second bridge arrangement of strain gauges including one pair of strain gauges mounted on one of the internal strain gauge mounting surfaces and one pair of strain gauges mounted on the other one of the internal strain gauge mounting surfaces.

13. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the first bridge arrangement and the second bridge arrangement are connected in parallel to at least partially counteract respective signal changes of each set when the load is repositioned along a length of the fork.

14. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the aperture defines an upper strain gauge mounting surface and a lower strain gauge mounting surface that each include a surface normal directed toward the horizontal reference plane.

15. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the aperture is I-shaped and extends completely through a width of the structural member.

16. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the aperture extends through a width of the structural member to define at least one thin-walled structural portion adjacent to the aperture.

17. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the structural member includes at least one thin-walled structural portion with opposing surfaces that are generally parallel to the horizontal reference plane.

18. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the structural member of each load cell includes a plurality of distinct apertures extending through a width therewith in series to define at least one thin-walled structural portion between the apertures.

19. The load cell of claim 12 wherein at least some of the strain gauges of the first bridge arrangement are positioned generally opposite of corresponding strain gauges of the second bridge arrangement relative to the horizontal reference plane.

20. The load cell of claim 12 wherein at least some of the strain gauges of the first bridge arrangement and corresponding strain gauges of the second bridge arraignment are located about equidistant from the horizontal reference plane.

21. The load cell of claim 12 wherein a first set of strain gauges of the first bridge arrangement is located further away from the horizontal reference than a first set of strain gauges of the second bridge arrangement, and wherein a spread of the first set of strain gauges of the first bridge arrangement is greater than a spread of the first set of the strain gauges of the second bridge arrangement.

22. The load cell of claim 12 wherein the first bridge arrangement is configured to exhibit a signal increase when, during use, a load is positioned on the forks with increasing distance from the load cell, and wherein the second bridge arrangement is configured to exhibit a signal decrease when, during use, the load is positioned on the forks with increasing distance from the load cell.

23. The load cell of claim 22 wherein the arrangement of strain gauges is configured such that a magnitude of the signal increase exhibited by the first bridge arrangement when the load is positioned on the forks with increasing distance from the load cell is about equal to a magnitude of the corresponding signal decrease exhibited by the second bridge arrangement.

24. The load cell of claim 23 wherein the arrangement of strain gauges is configured such that a summation of the magnitudes of the signals of the first bridge arrangement and the second bridge arrangement remains generally constant with changing position of the load along the forks.

25. A method of measuring a load carried by a pair of forks of a forklift that includes a fork carriage to movably position the forks, the method comprising:

obtaining signals from a respective arrangement of strain gauges of each of a plurality of load cells that are positioned between the fork carriage and the forks, at least some of the strain gauges of each respective arrangement of strain gauges of each load cell being located on parallel offset horizontal mounting surfaces defined by one or more apertures extending through a structural member thereof; and

processing the signals to obtain a load value indicative of a load shared by the pair of forks.

26. The method of claim 25 wherein obtaining signals from the arrangement of strain gauges of each load cell includes obtaining signals from a first bridge arrangement of strain gauges including one pair of strain gauges mounted on one of a pair of external surfaces of the structural member and one pair of strain gauges mounted on the other one of the pair of external surfaces of the structural member;

and

a second bridge arrangement of strain gauges including one pair of strain gauges mounted on one of the parallel offset horizontal mounting surfaces and one pair of strain gauges mounted on the other one of the parallel offset horizontal mounting surfaces.

27. The method of claim 25 wherein the strain gauges of the first bridge arrangement and the second bridge arrangement are arranged such that the load value indicative of the load shared by the pair of forks is maintained below a threshold accuracy of about 0.5 percent irrespective of a position of the load along a length of the forks, and wherein, for each load cell, the first bridge arrangement of strain gauges exhibits a signal change in a first direction when the load is positioned on the forks with increasing distance from the load cell and the second bridge arrangement of strain gauges exhibits a signal change in a second direction opposite the first direction when the load is positioned on the forks with increasing distance from the load cell.

28. The method of claim 27 wherein a magnitude of the signal change exhibited by the first bridge arrangement of strain gauges when the load is positioned on the forks with increasing distance from the load cell is about equal to a magnitude of the corresponding signal change exhibited by the second bridge arrangement of strain gauges such that a summation of the magnitudes of the signals of the first and the second bridge arrangements remains generally constant with changing position of the load along the forks.