ACOUSTIC TRANSMISSIVITY IMPAIRMENT DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS

• US 20140270206A1
• Filed: 03/13/2014
• Published: 09/18/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Cochlear Limited
• Original Assignee: Cochlear Limited
• Inventors: PORT, Timothy Alan
• Application Number:
  US14/208,658
• Publication Number:
  US 20140270206A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 381/58
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 2225/57 Aspects of electrical interconnection between hearing aid parts
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/305 Self-monitoring or self-testing
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/558 Remote control, e.g. of amplification, frequency
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/60 Mounting or interconnection of hearing aid parts, e.g. inside tips, housings or to ossicles ear wax retarders, e.g. mounting thereof H04R25/654
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/603 of mechanical or electronic switches or control elements
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/654 Ear wax retarders
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 29/004 for microphones H04R29/007 takes precedence

Abstract

A method of determining an extent of impairment of acoustic transmissivity of a structural arrangement exposing a microphone, the method including receiving first and second responses generated by the microphone responsive to received acoustic energy and ascertaining the extent of impairment based on the first and second responses.

Claims

1. A method of determining an extent of impairment of acoustic transmissivity of a structural arrangement exposing a microphone, the method comprising:

receiving first and second responses generated by the microphone responsive to received acoustic energy; and

ascertaining the extent of impairment based on the first and second responses.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the received acoustic energy includes a calibration component and a testing component; and

the first and second responses generated by the microphone are respectively responsive to the calibration component and the testing component.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein:

the structural arrangement has an initial extent of impairment represented by a baseline frequency response profile;

the calibration signal includes one or more frequencies located in a substantially flat region of the baseline frequency response profile; and

the testing signal includes one or more frequencies located in a substantially peaked region of the baseline frequency response profile.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the acoustic energy includes one or more first frequencies for which the microphone response is attenuated insignificantly by partial, albeit not substantially total, blockage of the structural arrangement;

the acoustic energy includes one or more second frequencies for which the microphone response is attenuated significantly by at least partial blockage of the structural arrangement; and

the first and second responses are respectively generated by the microphone response to the first and second frequencies.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the ascertaining includes manipulating the first and second responses.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein:

the manipulating includes;

determining a test value of a figure of merit (FOM) based on the first and second microphone responses; and

the ascertaining includes;

comparing the test value of the FOM against one or more reference values.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein:

the received acoustic energy has first and second frequency bands of interest, respectively; and

the determining includes;

obtaining a first representative amplitude for the first frequency band of the first response;

obtaining a second representative amplitude for the second frequency band of the second response;

calculating at least one of a difference or a quotient based on the first and second representative amplitudes; and

calculating the FOM based on at least one of the difference or the quotient.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein:

the acoustic energy is generated by a sound-wave source; and

the calculating at least one of a difference or a quotient includes;

determining a distance between the sound-wave source and the microphone based on the first representative amplitude for the first frequency band of the first response;

determining a predicted amplitude for the second frequency band of the second response based on the distance; and

forming the at least one of the difference or the quotient based on the predicted amplitude and second representative amplitude.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein:

the one or more reference values are degrees of impairment of the acoustic transmissivity; and

the ascertaining further includes;

providing an array of information that relates example values of the FOM to different degrees of impairment;

indexing the test value of the FOM into the array in order to obtain a corresponding degree of impairment; and

treating the corresponding degree of blockage as the determination of impairment.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein:

the providing, the indexing and the treating are performed by a remote control unit corresponding to the microphone; and

the determining the test value and the comparing the test value are performed by the main unit.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the microphone is mounted on a main unit that is part of an auditory prosthesis and a corresponding remote control unit; and

the method further comprises;

using the remote control unit as a sound wave source to thereby generate the acoustic energy.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein:

the remote control unit is a smartphone that includes corresponding executable remote control application software.

13. A method of determining an extent of impairment of acoustic transmissivity of a structural arrangement exposing a microphone, the method comprising:

receiving first and second responses generated by the microphone responsive to at least one of (i) a macro acoustic signal or (ii) respective separate first and second acoustic signals; and

ascertaining the extent of impairment based on the first and second responses.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein at least one of:

the macro acoustic signal to which the microphone is responsive is emitted from a given position proximal to the structural arrangement at least until the first and second responses are generated by the microphone;

or

(i) the first acoustic signal is emitted from a given position proximal to the structural arrangement and (ii) second acoustic signal is emitted in substantially the same proximity with the respect to the structural arrangement as the given position.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein at least one of:

the macro signal to which the microphone is responsive is emitted from a given orientation with respect to the structural arrangement at least until the first and second responses are generated by the microphone;

or

(i) the first acoustic signal is emitted from a given orientation with respect to the structural arrangement and (ii) second acoustic signal is emitted from substantially the same orientation with the respect to the structural arrangement.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein at least one of:

(i) the macro acoustic signal to which the microphone is responsive includes acoustic energy corresponding to that of a third acoustic signal and a fourth acoustic signal; and

the fourth acoustic signal is emitted such that a temporal period of emission thereof overlaps that of the third acoustic signal so as to substantially avoid effects upon the second response resulting from the fourth acoustic signal that otherwise would be due to the sound-wave source being in a second orientation at a latter emission time of the macro acoustic signal, the second orientation being different than an orientation at the given position at a former emission time of the macro acoustic signal, wherein the first response results from the third acoustic signal;

or

(ii) the second acoustic signal is emitted such that a temporal period of emission thereof overlaps that of the first acoustic signal so as to substantially avoid effects upon the second response that otherwise would be due to the sound-wave source being in a second orientation at the emission time of the second acoustic signal, the second orientation being different than an orientation at the given position at an emission time of the first acoustic signal.

17. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

determining a noise level associated with the first and second responses;

comparing the noise level to a noise threshold; and

selectively proceeding, based on the comparison, to one of (a) the receiving first and second responses and (b) the ascertaining of impairment.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the determining includes:

receiving, before proceeding to the receiving first and second responses, a preliminary response by the microphone to incident sound waves;

comparing the preliminary response to the noise threshold; and

selectively proceeding, based on the comparison, to the receiving first responses.

19. The method of claim 13, wherein:

the macro acoustic signal is received;

the first and second responses are included in a macro response that is responsive to the macro acoustic signal such that the first and second responses are generated substantially concurrently by the microphone.

20. The method of claim 13 wherein:

the structural arrangement includes a cover interposed between the microphone and incident sound waves; and

the method is utilized to determine extent of impairment of acoustic transmissivity of the cover to incident sound waves.

21. A system for determining an extent of impairment of acoustic transmissivity of a structural arrangement exposing a microphone of an audio-processing device to incident sound waves, the system comprising:

a sound-wave source;

the microphone; and

a sound processor configured to;

receive first and second responses by the microphone responsive one or more signals emitted by the sound-wave source; and

determine the extent of the impairment based on the first and second responses.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein:

the audio-processing device is an auditory prosthesis;

the microphone is mounted on the auditory prosthesis; and

the sound wave source is a remote control unit.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein:

the remote control unit is a smartphone.

24. The system of claim 21, wherein:

the one or more signals emitted by the sound-wave source are included as content in a relatively larger bandwidth macro acoustic signal; and

the first and second responses are included in a macro response that is responsive to the macro acoustic signal such that the first and second responses are generated substantially concurrently by the microphone.

25. The system of claim 21, wherein:

a plurality of signals are emitted at different times such that the first and second responses are received at different times.