CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR QUALITY EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF DISCHARGE PLANNING

• US 20140358579A1
• Filed: 11/23/2012
• Published: 12/04/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 12/09/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
• Original Assignee: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
• Inventors: Nikolova-Simons, Mariana, Wischmann, Hans-Aloys, Muskens, Johan, Rock, Joseph Ernest
• Application Number:
  US14/362,754
• Publication Number:
  US 20140358579A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/20 for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/30 for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/20 relating to practices or guidelines

Abstract

A system and method for evaluating a discharge planning process. The system and method perform the steps of determining whether a current set of discharge criteria matches current clinical practices, generating a matched set of discharge criteria by adapting the current set of discharge criteria to reflect the current clinical practices, generating a matching quality indicator value indicating a level of matching between the current set of discharge criteria and the current clinical practices, determining whether a user adheres to the matched set of discharge criteria, generating an adherence quality indicator value indicating a level to which the user adheres to the matched set of discharge criteria, determining whether the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies a target outcome and generating a satisfaction quality indicator value indicating a level to which the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies the target outcome.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a discharge planning process, comprising:

determining whether a current set of discharge criteria matches current clinical practices;

generating a matched set of discharge criteria by adapting the current set of discharge criteria to reflect the current clinical practices;

generating a matching quality indicator value indicating a level of matching between the current set of discharge criteria and the current clinical practices;

determining whether a user adheres to the matched set of discharge criteria;

generating an adherence quality indicator value indicating a level to which the user adheres to the matched set of discharge criteria;

determining whether the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies a target outcome; and

generating a satisfaction quality indicator value indicating a level to which the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies the target outcome.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies the target outcome includes comparing a current outcome generated from patient records within a patient population database to the target outcome.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining a number of patients that have been admitted and a number of patients that have been discharged during a selected period;

generating a discharge score for each discharged patient which indicates whether one of the current and the matched set of discharge criteria have been met; and

categorizing each discharged patient as one of discharged too early, discharged on time and discharged too late based on the discharge score.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

generating a discharge score for each patient on a selected day which indicates whether one of the current and the matched set of discharge criteria have been met;

identifying a discharge status of each patient on the selected day; and

categorizing each of the patients as one of discharged with unmet discharge criteria, hospitalized with unmet discharge criteria, discharged with met discharge criteria and hospitalized with met discharge criteria.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the matching quality indicator value is a ratio of a number of patients in the discharged on time category to a total number of discharged patients during the selected period.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining whether the current set of discharge criteria matches the current clinical practices by comparing the matching quality indicator value to a predetermined matching threshold value.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein the adherence quality indicator is a ratio of a number of patients in the discharged with met discharge criteria and hospitalized with unmet discharge criteria categories to a total number of patients on the selected day.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining whether the user adheres to the matched discharge criteria includes comparing the adherence quality indicator value to a predetermined adherence threshold value.

9. The method of claim 3, wherein the satisfaction quality indicator value is a value of a selected outcome within at least one of the admitted category, discharged too early category, discharged on time category, discharged too late category and a combined total patient population.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein determining the satisfaction of the matched discharge criteria includes comparing the value of the selected outcome to a predetermined satisfaction threshold value.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the matched set of discharge criteria includes identifying a need for clinical improvement, deriving potential new riles from analysis of clinical and cost outcomes correlated with patient data, and proposing new rules to be added to the discharge criteria.

12. A system for evaluating a quality of a threshold process, comprising:

a memory storing a current set of discharge criteria; and

a processor determining whether the current set of discharge criteria matches current clinical practices, generating a matched set of discharge criteria by matching the current set of discharge criteria to reflect the current clinical practices, generating a matching quality indicator value indicating a level of matching between the current set of discharge criteria and the current clinical practices, determining whether a user adheres to the matched set of discharge criteria, generating an adherence quality indicator value indicating a level to which the user adheres to the matched set of discharge criteria, determining whether the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies a target outcome, and generating a satisfaction quality indicator value indicating a level to which the matched set of discharge criteria satisfies the target outcome, using the processor.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the memory stores a plurality of patient records within a patient database and the processor compares a current outcome generated from patient records to a target outcome to determine whether discharge criteria are satisfied.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein the processor determines a number of patients that have been admitted and a number of patients that have been discharged during a selected period, generates a discharge score for each discharged patient which indicates whether one of the current and the matched set of discharge criteria have been met, and categorizes each discharged patient as one of discharged too early, discharged on time and discharged too late based on the discharge score.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the processor generates a discharge score for each patient on a selected day which indicates whether one of the current and the matched set of discharge criteria have been met, identifies a discharge status of each patient on the selected day, and categorizes each of the patient as one of discharged with unmet discharge criteria, hospitalized with unmet discharge criteria, discharged with met discharge criteria and hospitalized with met discharge criteria.

16. The system of claim 14, wherein the matching quality indicator value is a ratio of a number of patients in the discharged on time category to a total number of discharged patients during the selected period.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor determines whether the current set of discharge criteria matches the current clinical practices by comparing the matching quality indicator value to a predetermined matching threshold value.

18. The system of claim 15, wherein the adherence quality indicator is a ratio of a number of patients in the discharged with met discharge criteria and hospitalized with unmet discharge criteria categories to a total number of patients on the selected day.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the processor determines whether the user adheres to the matched discharge criteria includes comparing the adherence quality indicator value to a predetermined adherence threshold value.

20. The system of claim 14, wherein the satisfaction quality indicator value is a value of a selected outcome within at least one of the admitted category, discharged too early category, discharged on time category, discharged too late category and a combined total population.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein the processor determines the satisfaction of the matched discharge criteria includes comparing the value of the selected outcome to a predetermined satisfaction threshold value.

22. The system of claim 12, wherein the processor generates the matched set of discharge criteria by identifying a need for clinical improvement, deriving potential new riles from analysis of clinical and cost outcomes correlated with patient data and proposing new rules to be added to the discharge criteria.