COOPERATIVE INTRUSION DETECTION

• US 20140361920A1
• Filed: 06/10/2013
• Published: 12/11/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 06/10/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ademco Inc. (Resideo Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Katuri, SrinivasaRao, Huseth, Steve, Kulkarni, Amit
• Granted Patent: US 9,395,436 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 342/28
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/04 Systems determining presence of a target based on relative movement of target G01S13/56
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/325 using transmission of coded signals, e.g. P.S.K. signals
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/66 Radar-tracking systems; Analogous systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/87 Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/003 Transmission of data between radar, sonar or lidar systems and remote stations
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/1609 using active vibration detection systems
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/10 using wireless transmission systems G08B25/009 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/181 due to failing power supply
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/188 Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors

Abstract

Systems, methods, and devices for cooperative intrusion detection are described herein. For example, one or more embodiments include completing a radar scan with a network of outer perimeter radar nodes, detecting an intrusion event with the network of outer perimeter radar nodes, notifying at least one inner perimeter radar node in a network of inner perimeter radar nodes of the intrusion event, activating the at least one inner perimeter radar node from an idle mode in response to the notification of the intrusion event, and completing a radar scan with the at least one inner perimeter radar node upon activation.

Claims

1. A method for cooperative perimeter monitoring, comprising:

completing a radar scan with a network of outer perimeter radar nodes;

detecting an intrusion event with the network of outer perimeter radar nodes based on the radar scan;

notifying at least one inner perimeter radar node in a network of inner perimeter radar nodes of the intrusion event;

activating the at least one inner perimeter radar node from an idle mode in response to the notification of the intrusion event; and

completing a radar scan with the at least one inner perimeter radar node upon activation.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein;

the network of inner perimeter radar nodes operate in a sleep mode; and

the inner perimeter radar nodes check for a notification from a neighboring node at periodic intervals.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the network of outer perimeter radar nodes and inner perimeter radar nodes are arranged in a pattern that surrounds a monitored area with at least 3 nodes.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein an outer and inner perimeter of the monitored area is defined by scans made by the surrounding outer perimeter radar nodes and the inner perimeter radar nodes.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the method includes performing continual radar scans of the outer and inner perimeter of the monitored area until the intrusion event is not present in the monitored area.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein the method includes:

activating radar nodes forming a perimeter of an adjacent monitored area when the intrusion event moves across a boarder perimeter that is shared by the monitored area and the adjacent monitored area; and

causing nodes within the monitored area that do not form a shared boarder perimeter of the adjacent monitored area to enter a sleep mode.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the method includes entering a preliminary clutter rejection state with at least one of the outer perimeter radar nodes upon detection of an intrusion event, wherein the preliminary clutter rejection state filters out a false intrusion event.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the method includes:

entering a preliminary classification state with at least one of the outer perimeter radar nodes when the intrusion event is not filtered out by the preliminary clutter rejection state, wherein the preliminary classification state determines whether the intrusion event is a vehicle based on a speed associated with the intrusion event; and

activating the network of inner perimeter radar nodes from an idle mode in response to a determination that the intrusion event is a vehicle.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the method includes:

entering a final classification state with at least one of the network of outer perimeter radar nodes when the intrusion event is determined to not be a vehicle, wherein the final classification state determines whether the intrusion event is a human or an animal;

activating the network of inner perimeter radar nodes from an idle mode in response to a determination that the intrusion event is a human.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the method includes:

alternating between a sleep mode and an active mode with the outer perimeter radar nodes; and

performing a radar scan in one of a plurality of directions when the outer perimeter radar node is in the active mode.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the outer perimeter radar node enters the idle mode upon performing the radar scan and not detecting an intrusion event.

12. A machine-readable non-transitory medium storing instructions for cooperative perimeter monitoring, executable by a machine to cause the machine to:

receive, with an inner perimeter radar node, a notification from an outer perimeter radar node that an intrusion event has been detected by the outer perimeter radar node in a monitored area upon completion of a radar scan;

activate the inner perimeter radar node from an idle mode in response to receiving the notification of the intrusion event;

complete radar scans of the perimeter of the monitored area with the inner perimeter radar node and the outer perimeter radar node until the intrusion event is not present in the monitored area; and

activate radar nodes forming a perimeter of an adjacent monitored area when the intrusion event moves across a perimeter that is shared by the monitored area and the adjacent monitored area.

13. The medium of claim 12, further comprising instructions executable to cause radar nodes within the monitored area that do not form a perimeter of the adjacent monitored area to enter a sleep mode.

14. The medium of claim 12, wherein at least one of the outer perimeter radar node and the inner perimeter radar node act as a gateway radar node that relay a notification from a neighboring node of the intrusion event to a central control center.

15. The medium of claim 12, wherein the outer perimeter radar node completes a radar scan periodically based on a defined rate of travel associated with the intrusion event.

16. A system for cooperative perimeter monitoring, the system comprising a processing resource in communication with a non-transitory computer-readable medium, wherein the computer-readable medium contains a set of instructions and wherein the processing resource is designed to execute the set of instructions to:

complete a radar scan along an outer perimeter of a monitored area periodically, with an outer perimeter radar node, based on a defined rate of travel associated with an intrusion event;

detect an intrusion event in the monitored area with the radar scan;

notify an inner perimeter radar node of the monitored area of the intrusion event;

activate the inner perimeter radar node from an idle mode in response to the notification of the intrusion event; and

complete radar scans with the outer and inner perimeter radar nodes until the intrusion event leaves the monitored area.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the outer perimeter radar nodes are active nodes and the inner perimeter radar nodes are idle nodes; and

wherein a time associated with a sleep mode of the active nodes is shorter than a time associated with a sleep mode of the idle nodes.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the outer and inner perimeter radar nodes communicate with each other using a frequency that is different than a frequency used for the radar scans.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein a time at which the outer perimeter radar nodes perform the radar scan is synchronized.

20. The system of claim 16, wherein the frequency used for the radar scan can be varied depending on varying environmental conditions.