PORTABLE BUSINESS LOGIC

• US 20140372971A1
• Filed: 06/16/2013
• Published: 12/18/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 06/16/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Swaminathan, Bharath, Shankar, Anusha, Pagad, Suprita
• Application Number:
  US13/918,988
• Publication Number:
  US 20140372971A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/106
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/34 Graphical or visual programming
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/451 Execution arrangements for user interfaces

Abstract

Records in a computer system have associated logic rules. The logic rules can be created and modified using natural language expressions. The created or modified logic is converted to a form that can be run on a plurality of different clients, each using a different language.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of generating logic for a form, comprising:

displaying a rule definition user interface display with first user input mechanisms that receive rule definition user inputs defining a logic rule that is applied to a given form in a computer system;

automatically generating code representing the logic rule defined by the user definition user inputs, executable in a plurality of different contexts, to implement the logic rule on the given form.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the computer system comprises a business system and the form comprises a business form in the business system, and wherein receiving the rule definition user inputs comprises:

receiving business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein automatically generating code comprises:

automatically generating different code with a different conversion component for each different context to implement the business logic rule on the business form in each of the different contexts.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein automatically generating different code for each different context comprises:

automatically generating code for a client context comprising a mobile companion application that is a companion to the business system and run on a mobile device.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein automatically generating different code for each different context comprises:

automatically generating code for a client context comprising a web browser application run on a client device.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein automatically generating different code for each different context comprises:

automatically generating code for a client context comprising a personal information manager application run on a client device.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein automatically generating different code for each different context comprises:

automatically generating code for a client context comprising a server application that is run in a developer environment on a client device.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein automatically generating code comprises:

generating intermediate code; and

converting the intermediate code into code understandable by a device with an application in each of the different contexts.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 wherein generating the intermediate code comprises:

generating the intermediate code as XML code or a variant of XML code.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein receiving business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system comprises:

displaying a criteria user interface display; and

receiving criteria user inputs through the criteria user interface display defining criteria for firing the business logic rule on the business form.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 wherein receiving business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system comprises:

displaying an action user interface display; and

receiving action user inputs through the action user interface display defining an action taken when the business logic rule fires on the business form.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein receiving business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system comprises:

displaying a context control that receives context user inputs indicative of selected contexts in which the business logic rule applies.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein receiving business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system comprises:

displaying a rule control that receives a user request input indicative of a user request to create a new business logic rule or to modify an existing business logic rule.

14. A computer system, comprising:

an application that displays forms for performance of tasks;

an editor component that displays a rule definition user interface display with first user input mechanisms that receive rule definition user inputs defining a logic rule that is applied to a given form in the application, the editor component;

automatically generating code representing the logic rule defined by the definition user inputs, the code being executable in a plurality of different contexts, to implement the logic rule on the given form; and

a computer processor that is a functional part of the computer system and activated by the application and the editor component to facilitate displaying the rule definition user interface display, defining the logic rule, and automatically generating the code.

15. The computer system of claim 14 wherein the computer system comprises a business system and the form comprises a business form in the business system, and wherein the editor component receives business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system.

16. The computer system of claim 15 wherein the editor component generates a intermediate code indicative of the business logic rule, and further comprising:

a conversion component that converts the intermediate code into code that is executable in at least one of the plurality of different contexts.

17. The computer system of claim 15 wherein the editor component displays a criteria user interface display and receives criteria user inputs through the criteria user interface display defining criteria for firing the business logic rule on the business form.

18. The computer system of claim 17 wherein the editor component displays an action user interface display and receives action user inputs through the action user interface display defining an action taken when the business logic rule fires on the business form.

19. A computer readable storage medium that stores computer executable instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method, comprising:

displaying a rule definition user interface display with first user input mechanisms that receive rule definition user inputs defining a logic rule that is applied to a given form in a computer system; and

automatically generating code representing the logic rule defined by the user definition user inputs, executable in a plurality of different client contexts, to implement the logic rule on the given form., the client contexts including a mobile client context and a server client context.

20. The computer readable storage medium of claim 19 wherein the computer system comprises a business system and the form comprises a business form in the business system, and wherein receiving the rule definition user inputs comprises:

receiving business logic rule definition inputs defining a business logic rule applied to the business form in the business system.