MULTILAYER PERIMETER INSTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM FOR MULTI-PROCESSOR SENSING

• US 20150009031A1
• Filed: 07/03/2013
• Published: 01/08/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 07/03/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Bedros, Saad J., Gellaboina, Mahesh K., Eswara, Lalitha M.
• Application Number:
  US13/935,022
• Publication Number:
  US 20150009031A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/566
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/122 for a perimeter fence features peculiar to electrified fences A01K3/00
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/188 Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors

Abstract

A system includes perimeter intrusion detection sensors and a computer processor communicatively coupled to the perimeter intrusion detection sensors. The system receives data from the perimeter intrusion detection sensors, fuses the data from the perimeter intrusion detection sensors, and generates a single alarm from the fused data when the fused data indicates a breach of an area associated with the perimeter intrusion detection sensors. A sensor fusion framework for accomplishing these tasks is described.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors; and

a computer processor communicatively coupled to the plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

wherein the computer processor is operable to execute a sensor fusion framework that;

receives event data from the plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

computes a common location and range uncertainty from the plurality of two or more detection sensors;

clusters the event data from the plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

analyzes the clustered event data based on different sensor performance characteristics;

generates a single alarm from the clustered data when the clustered data indicates a breach of a perimeter associated with the perimeter intrusion detection sensors; and

provides situation awareness based on alarms generated across the perimeter.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is operable to:

determine an alarm or non-alarm state of the sensors considering the clustered data using one or more of a rule-based engine, a fuzzy rules-based engine, and Bayesian processing; and

provide perimeter breach using one or more of a static rule based engine, a fuzzy rule based engine, evidence based reasoning, or a hidden Markov model considering one or more estimated alarms.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the clustering of the data is based on characteristics of the plurality of perimeter intrusion detection sensors, a mapping of the plurality of perimeter intrusion detection sensors to a global coordinate system, and analytic performance of each type of the plurality of perimeter intrusion detection sensors.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the clustering of the data comprises associating the data from the plurality of perimeter intrusion detection sensors into a plurality of clusters, analyzing each of the sensor clusters to determine if a true intrusion occurred, and analyzing a detection of multiple simple events to determine a complex intrusion activity occurrence.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the associating the data is based on a location and time of a detected object, an uncertainty of the location of the detected object, and an uncertainty of the time of the detected object.

6. The system of claim 4, wherein the associating the data comprises converting a spatial mapping and sensor analytics into an uncertainty in a spatial domain and an uncertainty in a temporal domain;

wherein the spatial uncertainty is computed based on a relative location of a detected object in a field of view of the perimeter intrusion detection sensor; and

wherein the temporal uncertainty is computed based on a type of perimeter intrusion detection sensor and the sensor analytics of the sensor.

7. The system of claim 4, wherein the association the data comprises adaptively computing a temporal gate based on each type of sensor and adaptively computing a spatial gate based on each type of sensor based on time and distance.

8. The system of claim 4, wherein the associating the data comprises computing a distance between sensor readings using spatial and temporal uncertainty for a gating-based association.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the clustering of the data from the plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors comprises:

marking two or more sensor readings as independent when there is no overlap in a time interval of the two or more sensor readings;

computing spatial uncertainty regions around the two or more sensor readings with overlapping time intervals;

determining if there is an overlap among the uncertainty regions; and

associating the two or more sensor readings when the overlap is greater than a threshold.

11. The system of claim 2, wherein the estimation of alarm state of sensors comprises:

evaluating the clustered sensor data through a rule based engine;

computing a rule confidence of clustered sensor data based on sensor characteristics, topology using log-likelihood, missed detection, and other probability based approaches;

marking the fused sensor data as alarms or non-alarms based on the computed rule confidence; and

mapping the alarms detected as simple events.

12. The system of claim 2, wherein the estimation of alarm state of the system comprises:

evaluating the fused sensor data through characteristics, topology using log-likelihood, missed detection, and other probability based approaches;

marking the fused sensor data as alarms or non-alarms based on a computed confidence; and

mapping the alarms detected as simple events.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensor performance characteristics are detection and false alarm rates of the sensor or receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that change with environment or object properties.

14. The system of claim 2, wherein the rule base parameters comprise triggered sensors or triggered sensor values and the rule outcome comprises a simple event including an intrusion or a cross of a boundary.

15. The system of claim 2, wherein topology defines a placement and orientation of sensors in a facility through fields of view descriptions of the sensors.

16. The system of claim 2, wherein the state estimation or simple event detection uses topology and individual sensor alarms or readings based on high level logical rules from which specific rules indicating sensor ids can be derived.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the situation awareness comprises:

collecting abnormal events occurring over a period of time;

building an events network using time of event occurrence, type, functional relationship, and consistency of relationship;

reducing false alarms in the connected events based on cumulative probability of the events considered; and

discovering new event relationships from the events network based on relationship consistency using confidences.

10. The system of claim 10, wherein a determination of the overlap in the time interval further comprises:

determining a metric of temporal association by dividing the overlap by a temporal gate; and

marking the two or more sensor reading as independent when the metric of temporal association is equal to zero.

18. A process for executing a sensor fusion framework comprising:

receiving data from a plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

fusing the data from the plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

generating a single alarm from the fused data when the fused data indicates a breach of a perimeter associated with the perimeter intrusion detection sensors; and

providing situation awareness based on alarms generated across the perimeter.

19. A computer readable medium comprising instructions that when executed by a processor execute a process comprising:

receiving data from a plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

fusing the data from the plurality of two or more different types of perimeter intrusion detection sensors;

generating a single alarm from the fused data when the fused data indicates a breach of a perimeter associated with the perimeter intrusion detection sensors; and

providing situation awareness based on alarms generated across the perimeter.