Financial Systems and Methods for Increasing Capital Availability by Decreasing Lending Risk

• US 20150026034A1
• Filed: 01/14/2014
• Published: 01/22/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 07/18/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hetero Research Foundation
• Original Assignee: Credibility Corp. (Dun & Bradstreet Corp.)
• Inventors: Stibel, Jeffrey M.
• Application Number:
  US14/155,158
• Publication Number:
  US 20150026034A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/38
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/03 Credit; Loans; Processing thereof

Abstract

Some embodiments provide a guarantor system for backstopping all or a substantial portion of a lender'"'"'s portfolio of loans with an insurance guarantee. The guarantor system builds the insurance guarantee into the covered portion of the lender'"'"'s portfolio in an integrated manner, whereby the overhead cost for insuring the loans of the portfolio is distributed across the portfolio instead of being distributed individually to each borrower based on the individual borrower'"'"'s risk profile. Some embodiments also provide various monitoring services to reduce lender risk. These include contacting the borrower to remind the borrower of upcoming payments that are due, conducting a quasi-audit of the borrowers to inform the lenders of a potential risk of default, and establishing a credit profile for the borrower using the information collected as part of the quasi-audit.

Claims

1. A method for reducing risk across a portfolio of loans issued by a lender to a plurality of borrowers, the method comprising:

performing a risk assessment of the lender that is independent of individual borrower default risk and that is further independent of individual loan default risk;

providing an insurance policy uniformly guaranteeing the portfolio of loans by guaranteeing at least some portion of each loan in the portfolio of loans based on the risk assessment of the lender, wherein said insurance policy applies to each loan in the portfolio of loans independent of different risks associated with each borrower of the plurality of borrowers and different risks associated with each loan in the portfolio of loans;

deriving a premium computation to apply across the portfolio of loans based on said risk assessment of the lender, wherein the premium computation provides a uniform premium amount that is chargeable for each borrowed dollar of a loan;

charging a premium to each loan in the portfolio of loans based on the premium computation and an amount of the loan, wherein the premium charged to each loan is determined independent of risk individually associated with a borrower of the loan and risk individually associated with the loan;

monitoring performance of a particular borrower in relation to a particular loan from the portfolio of loans issued to the particular borrower, wherein said monitoring comprises periodically contacting the particular borrower at different stages throughout pendency of the particular loan and obtaining information relating to creditworthiness of the particular borrower from the particular borrower at each of the different stages; and

offsetting an amount from the premium charged to the particular borrower for guaranteeing some portion of the particular loan by reselling the information relating to creditworthiness of the particular borrower to any of a lender and credit reporting agency.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising receiving notice of default on a loan from the plurality of loans and providing payment to the lender for a portion of said loan that is guaranteed by the insurance policy.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein performing the risk assessment of the lender comprises measuring risk that is associated with a loan granting practice of the lender.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein performing the risk assessment of the lender comprises measuring total exposure to the lender from all loans in the portfolio of loans.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising computing a first amount for the uniform premium amount when the risk assessment of the lender identifies a lower than average rate of loan default across the portfolio and a second amount for the uniform premium amount when the risk assessment of the lender identifies a higher than average rate of load default across the portfolio, wherein the first amount is less than the second amount.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising selling the insurance policy to a third party guarantor, wherein the third party guarantor assumes obligations under the insurance policy to provide payment to the lender in event of loan default.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating terms for the insurance policy that vary from initiation to termination of a loan, the terms comprising providing a first amount of coverage for a first duration of the loan and a second amount of coverage for a second duration of the loan.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first amount of coverage guarantees a greater portion of the loan than the second amount of coverage.

22. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining information relating to creditworthiness of the particular borrower comprises obtaining information about any of financial performance and changes to the particular borrower'"'"'s business operations.

23. The method of claim 1 further comprising auditing the particular borrower on behalf of the lender by quantifying risk of the particular borrower defaulting on the particular loan based on the information relating to creditworthiness of the particular borrower and by notifying the lender of said risk in advance of any default by the particular borrower.

24. The method of claim 1 further comprising populating a credit report of the particular borrower at a credit reporting agency with the information relating to creditworthiness of the particular borrower at each of the different stages.

9. A guarantor system for reducing lender risk, the system comprising:

non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions; and

a computer processor in communication with the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, the computer-executable instructions from the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium programming the computer processor in;

performing a risk assessment of a lender based on total risk exposure to the lender from a plurality of loans issued by the lender;

determining, based on the risk assessment of the lender, a policy for guaranteeing at least some portion of each loan of the plurality of loans and a uniform premium amount that is chargeable for each borrowed dollar of a loan guaranteed by said policy;

providing a guarantee to a new loan issued by the lender to a particular borrower under said policy upon approval of a first loan application process conducted between the lender and the particular borrower, without the borrower conducting a second guarantee application process to separately apply for the guarantee with a guarantor;

computing an insurance premium for the new loan based on an amount of the new loan and the uniform premium amount that is chargeable for each borrowed dollar, and wherein computing the insurance premium is independent of the particular borrower'"'"'s default risk;

assessing the insurance premium in return for guaranteeing the new loan; and

auditing the particular borrower during pendency of the new loan, wherein said auditing comprises contacting trade references engaged with the particular borrower during pendency of the new loan and quantifying risk of the particular borrower defaulting on the new loan based on information collected from the trade references.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the policy insures a loan up to a first amount during a first term of the loan and up to a second amount during a second term of the loan, and wherein the first amount is greater than the second amount and the first term precedes the second term.

11. The system of claim 9, wherein the computer-executable instructions from the computer-readable non-transitory storage medium further program the computer processor in monitoring the new loan by notifying the particular borrower of upcoming payment due dates and by monitoring the particular borrower'"'"'s payment history on the new loan during pendency of the new loan.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the computer-executable instructions from the computer-readable non-transitory storage medium further program the computer processor in compiling updated information about financial performance of the particular borrower and changes to the particular borrower'"'"'s business operations.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the computer-executable instructions from the computer-readable non-transitory storage medium further program the computer processor in populating a credit profile for the particular borrower stored to the computer-readable non-transitory storage medium with the updated information.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein quantifying the risk of the particular borrower defaulting on the new loan is further based on any of said financial performance of the particular borrower and changes to the particular borrower'"'"'s business operations.

15-21. -21. (canceled)