PREDICTIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS TO TRIGGER REBUILD OF A DRIVE IN A RAID ARRAY

• US 20150046756A1
• Filed: 08/20/2013
• Published: 02/12/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 08/08/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: LSI Corporation (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Sreekumaran, Dipu, Leela, Abin Sreedharan, Asanarukunju, Safeer
• Application Number:
  US13/970,921
• Publication Number:
  US 20150046756A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/47.2
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/008 Reliability or availability analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1076 Parity data used in redundant arrays of independent storages, e.g. in RAID systems

Abstract

An apparatus comprising a first interface, a second interface and a processor. The first interface may be configured to connect to a host device. The second interface may be configured to connect to a plurality of drives. The processor may be configured to (i) periodically read a drive attribute from each of the drives, (ii) determine a risk factor based on the attribute, (iii) determine if each of the drives is likely to fail based on the risk factor, (iv) determine a cost factor for each of the drives determined to be likely to fail, (v) determine a threshold risk factor based on the cost factor for each of the drives determined to be likely to fail and (vi) if one of the drives is determined to be likely to fail and if the risk factor is more than the threshold risk factor, replace the drive determined to be likely to fail prior to the failure.

Claims

1. An apparatus comprising:

a first interface configured to connect to a host device;

a second interface configured to connect to a plurality of drives; and

a processor configured to (i) periodically read a drive attribute from each of said drives, (ii) determine a risk factor based on the attribute, (iii) determine if each of said drives is likely to fail based on said risk factor, (iv) determine a cost factor for each of said drives determined to be likely to fail, (v) determine a threshold risk factor based on the cost factor for each of the drives determined to be likely to fail and (v) if one of said drives is determined to be likely to fail and if said risk factor is more than said threshold risk factor, replace said drive determined to be likely to fail prior to said failure.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said cost factor is increased if said attributes indicate data on said drive likely to fail will become unreadable.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of drives are configured as a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Drives (RAID).

4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said processor determines which one or more of said drives is likely to fail by calculating said risk factor for each of said drives.

5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said cost factor represents a cost to replace one of said drives.

6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said risk factor is adjusted based on reliability trends of said drives.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said risk factor is calculated at a regular interval after each periodic read of said drive attribute.

8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said regular interval is configurable.

9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said apparatus implements a predictive failure analysis used to trigger a rebuild in a drive array.

10. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said processor balances system usage to minimize data unavailability.

11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said processor is configured to send a report to an administrator if said cost factor is greater than said predetermined cost.

12. A method for initiating a rebuild of a drive in an array, comprising the steps of:

(A) reading a drive attribute from each of said drives at a periodic interval;

(B) determining a risk factor based on the attribute;

(C) determining if each of said drives is likely to fail based on said risk factor;

(D) determining a cost factor for each of said drives determined to be likely to fail;

(E) determining a threshold risk factor based on the cost factor for each of the drives determined to be likely to fail; and

(F) if one of said drives is determined to be likely to fail and if said risk factor is more than said threshold risk factor, replacing said drive determined to be likely to fail prior to said failure.

13. The method according to claim 12, wherein said risk factor used to determine if each of said drives is likely to fail is adjusted based on reliability trends of said drives.

14. The method according to claim 12, wherein said method balances system usage to minimize data unavailability.

15. The method according to claim 12, wherein said method is configured to send a report to an administrator if said cost factor is greater than said predetermined cost.