GENERATING WORK PLANS USING SUBSTITUTE CONSTITUENTS

• US 20150058065A1
• Filed: 08/21/2013
• Published: 02/26/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 08/21/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: GlobalFoundries, Inc.
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Pinel, Florian, Varshney, Lav R.
• Application Number:
  US13/972,232
• Publication Number:
  US 20150058065A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.25
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06313 Resource planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06315 Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis

Abstract

A method comprises evaluating a first work plan comprising one or more constituents to determine a first set of work plan metrics, determining one or more constraints for constituents of the first work plan, selecting one or more substitute constituents to replace constituents of the first work plan based at least in part on the determined constraints and the determined work plan metrics and generating a second work plan using the substitute constituents, the second work plan having a second set of work plan metrics similar to the first set of work plan metrics. The evaluating, determining, selecting and generating are performed by at least one processing device.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

evaluating a first work plan comprising one or more constituents to determine a first set of work plan metrics;

determining one or more constraints for constituents of the first work plan;

selecting one or more substitute constituents to replace constituents of the first work plan based at least in part on the determined constraints and the determined work plan metrics; and

generating a second work plan using the substitute constituents, the second work plan having a second set of work plan metrics similar to the first set of work plan metrics;

wherein the evaluating, determining, selecting and generating are performed by at least one processing device.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one or more substitute constituents comprises:

selecting a given constituent subject to at least one of the determined constraints;

determining one or more alternate constituents for the given constituent;

for each of the alternate constituents, determining constituents of the work plan other than the given constituent to be removed or replaced with one or more associated replacement constituents to maintain the first set of work plan metrics; and

selecting a given alternate constituent and associated replacement constituents as the substitute constituents.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein selecting the given alternate constituent and associated replacement constituents is based at least in part on a cost of the given alternate constituent and associated replacement constituents.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein selecting the given alternate constituent and associated replacement constituents is based at least in part on the number of associated replacement constituents.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein selecting the given alternate constituent and associated replacement constituents is based at least in part on an availability of the alternate constituent and associated replacement constituents.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the alternate constituents comprises:

analyzing the given constituent to determine one or more attributes;

searching a knowledge database of constituents to determine alternate constituents having attributes similar to the attributes of the given constituent.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein determining alternate constituents further comprises:

determining a given class associated with the first work plan;

identifying a set of constituents of one or more other work plans in the given class; and

selecting the alternate constituents from the identified set of constituents.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein determining alternate constituents further comprises:

identifying a set of constituents;

determining a substitutability metric of each constituent in the identified set;

ranking the constituents in the identified set based at least in part on the determined substitutability metrics; and

selecting one or more constituents in the identified set based on the constituent rankings.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the first work plan further comprises determining an acceptable range of values for the first set of metrics, the second set of metrics being in the acceptable range of values.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more constraints comprise at least one of an increase in the cost of one or more constituents and a shortage in the availability of one or more constituents.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more constraints comprise one or more user-defined constraints.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more constraints comprise a medical or health restriction relating to the one or more constituents.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the second work plan further comprises generating the second work plan and one or more additional work plans having respective sets of work plan metrics similar to those of the first set of work plan metrics.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the first work plan and the second work plan comprise respective food recipes.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the first set of metrics comprises:

at least one of chemistry, texture, taste, visual appeal and olfactory pleasantness; and

at least one of caloric value, nutrient value and financial cost.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the first work plan and the second work plan comprise respective travel itineraries.

17-20. -20. (canceled)