AUTOMATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUDITING AND DISPUTING THIRD-PARTY RECORDS OF PAYMENTS TO PROFESSIONALS

• US 20150073951A1
• Filed: 09/09/2014
• Published: 03/12/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 09/09/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Primacea, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Primacea, Inc.
• Inventors: Ladd, Steven Kif, Cagnetta, Steven J., Horton, David C., Duda, David M.
• Application Number:
  US14/481,733
• Publication Number:
  US 20150073951A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/30
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/018 Certifying business or products
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/12 Accounting
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services

Abstract

Systems, methods, and computer program product for verifying financial exchanges made by an organization to a professional include obtaining, from a third-party database, payment information related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to a professional, automatically comparing the payment information obtained from the third-party database related to the payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to the professional with payment information entered by the professional through an online portal into a second database, and displaying, to an authorized viewer, results of the comparison of the payment information entered by the professional into the second database with the payment information obtained from the third-party database, to facilitate identifying discrepancies therebetween.

Claims

1. A method of verifying financial exchanges made by an organization to a professional, the method comprising:

obtaining, from a third-party database, payment information related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to a professional;

automatically comparing the payment information obtained from the third-party database related to the payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to the professional with payment information entered by the professional through an online portal into a second database; and

displaying, to an authorized viewer, results of the comparison of the payment information entered by the professional into the second database with the payment information obtained from the third-party database, to facilitate identifying discrepancies therebetween.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising establishing an account on behalf of the professional to access the third-party database in order to obtain the payment information related to payments made by one or more organizations to a professional.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising selectively entering, by the professional, corrections to the payment information in the third-party database.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising flagging, in the display, discrepancies between the payment information entered by the professional and the payment information related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to the professional stored in the third-party database.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the third-party database is a publicly available database.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the third-party database is proposed for public availability and the automatically comparing of the payment information obtained from the third-party database with payment information entered by the professional into the second database occurs before publication of the third-party database.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the professional is a healthcare professional and the authorized viewer is a member of a medical institution employing the healthcare professional and who views the displayed comparison through a second, different online portal.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the professional is a healthcare professional and the authorized viewer is a representative who views the displayed comparison through a second, different online portal.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the professional is a professor or researcher and the authorized viewer is a member of an institution of higher learning that employs the professor or researcher and who views the displayed comparison through a second, different online portal.

10. An auditing system comprising:

a first data repository storing payment information related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to a professional;

a second data repository storing payment information related to payments received by the professional from the one or more organizations and entered into the second data repository by the professional through a first online portal; and

a processor programmed to automatically compare the payment information stored in the first data repository with the payment information stored in the second data repository, the processor being further programmed to present a second online portal through which a user acquires results of the comparison for viewing.

11. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the professional is a healthcare professional and the user is an individual of an entity authorized to access information about the healthcare professional and who views the comparison results through the second online portal presented by the processor.

12. The auditing system of claim 11, wherein the authorized entity is a medical institution employing the healthcare professional.

13. The auditing system of claim 11, wherein the individual is a representative of the professional.

14. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the processor is further programmed to:

establish an account, on behalf of the professional, to access a third-party database from which to obtain the payment information related to payments purportedly made by the one or more organizations to the professional; and

store the payment information related to payments purportedly made by the one or more organizations to the professional in the first data repository.

15. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the processor is further programmed to selectively enter, by the professional, corrections to the payment information in the third-party database.

16. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the third-party database is a publicly available database.

17. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the third-party database is proposed for public availability, and wherein the automatic comparison occurs before publication of the third-party database.

18. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the processor is further programmed to flag discrepancies between the payment information entered by the professional into the second data repository and the payment information related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to the professional stored in the first data repository.

19. The auditing system of claim 10, wherein the professional is a professor or researcher and the user is a member of an institution of higher learning that employs the professor or researcher and who views the comparison through the second online portal presented by the processor.

20. A computer program product for verifying financial exchanges made by an organization to a professional, the computer program product comprising:

a computer readable persistent storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, the computer readable program code comprising;

computer readable program code configured to obtain, if executed, from a third-party database, payment information related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to a professional;

computer readable program code configured to compare, if executed, the payment information obtained from the third-party database related to payments purportedly made by one or more organizations to the professional with payment information entered by the professional through an online portal into a second database; and

computer readable program code configured to display, if executed, to an authorized viewer, results of a comparison of the payment information entered by the professional with the payment information obtained from the third-party database, to facilitate identifying discrepancies therebetween.