SYSTEM FOR MONITORING SAFETY PROTOCOLS

• US 20150081379A1
• Filed: 12/05/2014
• Published: 03/19/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/12/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: ACM Automation Inc.
• Original Assignee: ACM Automation Inc.
• Inventors: FISHER, Patrick, BINGHAM, Ken
• Application Number:
  US14/561,526
• Publication Number:
  US 20150081379A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.28
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0631 Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0635 Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/265 Personal security, identity or safety
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/80 Management or planning

Abstract

A system for monitoring the impact of lack of safeguards and procedures and for converting that into a metric of risk for any industrial facility or transportation of the same substances or products. A user interface allows access to a database containing safety documents for all safeguard'"'"'s and procedures. The user interface also interfaces with a safety calculation module that calculates the risk level for specific potential consequences if specific safety procedures are not implemented and if specific safeguards become unavailable in any way. The calculation module calculates risk on a per scenario basis using a risk performance indicator, (RPI), metric. This metric is calculated as the difference between projected risk and tolerable risk. A total risk for an area of a facility can be calculated by summing all risk performance indicator metrics for all scenarios in that area.

Claims

1. A system for monitoring safeguards and procedures relating to probable potential hazardous events in a facility;

the system comprising;

A user interface for providing a user with analysis tools and alarms relating to hazardous events in said facility;

A database of safety related documents, said documents being accessed by said user interface to determine if safety procedures for said plurality of components are being implemented;

a safety calculation module for calculating risk levels if said safeguards and procedures for said plurality of components are not operative or implemented, said risk levels being presented to said user through said user interface, said risk levels being related to at least one consequence if said safety procedures are not implemented;

Wherein said safety calculation module calculates an overall risk level for each scenario using a risk performance indicator metric, said risk performance indicator metric being calculated as tolerable risk subtracted from projected risk.

2. A system according to claim 1, wherein said system provides alerts, analysis, what if scenarios, operator observations, and scheduled safety inspections for each of said plurality of components on said user interface.

3. A system according to claim 2, wherein missed safety inspections, maintenance and testing procedures are presented on said user interface using a timeline.

4. A system according to claim 1, wherein in the event of a potentially unsafe situation concerning at least one of said hazardous events, said user interface provides contingency options to said safety operator.

5. A system according to claim 1, wherein each potential consequence of a potentially unsafe situation is assigned a mitigated frequency metric, said mitigated frequency metric being based on a probability of failure of at least one layer of protection to prevent or mitigate said consequence.

6. A system according to claim 5, wherein said mitigated frequency metric is calculated as a sum of metrics for each potential cause of said potential consequence and each layer of protection to prevent or mitigate said consequence.

7. A system according to claim 6, wherein said metrics for each potential cause and each layer of protection is calculated as said potential cause'"'"'s initiating event frequency multiplied by each relevant layer of protection'"'"'s probability of failure on demand.

8. A system according to claim 5, wherein said mitigated frequency metric is calculated as:

MF=Σ

(IEF×

PFD_Total)_{for each potential cause}

Where;

IEF is an initiating event frequency for a potential cause for said potential consequence

PFD_Total is a total probability of failure on demand for all layers of protection affected by said potential cause leading to said potential consequence.

9. A system according to claim 1, wherein in the event of a potentially unsafe situation concerning at least one of said plurality of components, said user interface provides said user operator with potential consequences for said unsafe situation.

10. A system according to claim 1, wherein said risk levels are related to a risk that said potential consequences will probably occur if said unsafe situation occurs.

11. A system according to claim 1, wherein a facility risk metric for a specific area in said facility is calculated by summing all risk performance indicator metrics for all scenarios within said specific area.

12. A system according to claim 10, wherein, for each contingency option provided to said user, said user interface also provides a modified risk level relating to failed safeguards and procedures, said modified risk level being a risk level where consequences will be more likely to occur on a process demand, each contingency option, if implemented, reduces a likelihood that said hazardous event occurs.

13. A system according to claim 1, wherein said user interface displays unsafe situations to said user on a historical timeline.

14. A system according to claim 5, wherein said user interface displays a risk level for said unsafe situation, said risk level being calculated by said safety calculation module, said user interface displaying a modified risk level for each failed safeguard or procedure.

15. A system according to claim 1, wherein for each unsafe situation concerning at least one of said plurality of components, a user interface displays a listing of probable consequences if failed safeguards and procedures occur.

16. A system according to claim 1, wherein each one of said potential consequences is classified as to severity of said consequence.

17. A system according to claim 1, wherein each one of said potential consequences is classified according to a plurality of categories.

18. A system according to claim 14, wherein said plurality of categories includes at least one of:

safety

environmental

economic/asset loss

reputation

19. A system according to claim 1, wherein said user interface displays to said safety operator at least one contingencies option currently implemented.

20. A system for monitoring safeguards and safety related procedures relating to Process Risk Management and Safety in a facility, the system comprising:

A user interface for providing alarms and information relating to said specific components;

a database of safety related documents, said documents being accessed by said user interface to record and display design assumptions, design conditions, design environment, and functionality of said safeguards;

a safety calculation module for calculating risk levels relating to potential probable consequences if said safeguards and procedures for said specific components, devices, systems are not implemented, bypassed, failed, or inhibited in any way being presented to said users through said user interface, said safety calculation module calculating said risk levels on a per scenario basis using a severity of consequence multiplied by a difference between projected risk and tolerable risk.