Method for monitoring the operation of an aircraft piloting device and an aircraft piloting device thus monitored

• US 20150108281A1
• Filed: 10/21/2014
• Published: 04/23/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/22/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ratier Figeac (Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX)
• Original Assignee: Ratier Figeac (Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX)
• Inventors: ANTRAYGUE, Cedric
• Application Number:
  US14/519,333
• Publication Number:
  US 20150108281A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 244/223
• CPC Class Codes: B64C 13/0421 control sticks for primary flight controls
• CPC Class Codes: B64C 13/505 having duplication or stand-by provisions
• CPC Class Codes: B64C 13/507 with artificial feel
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/2637 Vehicle, car, auto, wheelchair
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0235 based on a comparison with predetermined threshold or range, e.g. "classical methods", carried out during normal operation; threshold adaptation or choice; when or how to compare with the threshold

Abstract

A method for monitoring an aircraft piloting device including at least one piloting member (20, 30) and at least one fly-by-wire flight control system (40, 41). At least one monitoring module is integrated into this control system and is adapted to compute, on the basis of primary signals processed by sensors associated with at least one piloting member, at least one theoretical value of at least one monitored parameter of at least one piloting member, to compare each theoretical value with measurement signals of each monitored parameter and to select a monitoring action, particularly to generate monitoring signals (55, 56), as a function of the difference between each theoretical value and the measurement signals.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring the operation of an aircraft piloting device comprising:

at least one piloting member (20, 30);

at least one fly-by-wire flight control system (40, 41) adapted to generate, as a function of predetermined control laws, signals for controlling actuators (23, 33) of flight control members of said aircraft at least as a function of signals, called primary signals, delivered by sensors associated with each piloting member,

said method for monitoring operation being adapted to detect operating anomalies within said piloting device and to generate corresponding monitoring signals (55, 56) and comprising the following steps;

computing, on the basis of at least part of signals delivered by sensors associated with each piloting member and according to at least one predetermined computation law, at least one theoretical value of at least one operating parameter, called monitored parameter, of at least one piloting member (20, 30);

comparing, for each monitored parameter, each theoretical value with measurement signals delivered by sensors associated with at least one piloting member;

selecting a monitoring action as a function of the difference between each theoretical value and said measurement signals,

characterised in that said at least one theoretical value is computed on the basis of at least part of said primary signals, and in that it is implemented by at least one monitoring module (53, 54) integrated into a fly-by-wire flight control system (40, 41).

2. The method according to claim 1, characterised in that at least one monitored parameter is selected from the position of said piloting member (20, 30) and the forces imparted to said piloting member (20, 30).

3. The method according to claim 2, characterised in that said primary signals comprise position signals delivered by position sensors (22, 32) associated with said piloting member, in that the forces imparted to said piloting member are used by way of monitored parameter, and in that at least one theoretical value of static forces is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54) as a function of a predetermined computation law linking the position with the force.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterised in that said primary signals comprise position signals delivered by position sensors (22, 32) associated with said piloting member, in that the forces imparted to said piloting member are used by way of monitored parameter, and in that at least one theoretical value of damping forces is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54) as a function of a predetermined computation law linking the time drift of the position with the force.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterised in that said primary signals comprise position signals delivered by position sensors (22, 32) associated with said piloting member, in that the forces imparted to said piloting member are used by way of monitored parameter, and in that at least one theoretical value of inertia forces is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54) as a function of a predetermined computation law linking the second time drift of the position with the force.

6. The method according to claim 3, characterised in that at least one theoretical value of forces, which is the algebraic sum of said theoretical values of static, damping and inertia forces, is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54).

7. The method according to claim 1, characterised in that said piloting device comprises at least one actuating motor (23, 33) for at least one piloting member and at least one control unit (60) capable of producing signals, called force feedback signals, for controlling each actuating motor designed to generate a simulated force feedback sensation on said piloting member, in that said monitoring module (53, 54) is executed by at least one central processing unit of a fly-by-wire flight control system distinct from said at least one control unit, and in that said monitoring module (53, 54) is adapted to inhibit at least one force feedback actuating motor when the difference between each theoretical value and said measurement signals is greater by absolute value than a predetermined threshold value corresponding to an operating anomaly.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterised in that a second-order transfer function is used to process an error signal as a function of the difference between each theoretical value and said measurement signals.

16. The method according to claim 3, characterised in that said primary signals comprise position signals delivered by position sensors (22, 32) associated with said piloting member, in that the forces imparted to said piloting member are used by way of monitored parameter, and in that at least one theoretical value of damping forces is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54) as a function of a predetermined computation law linking the time drift of the position with the force.

17. The method according to claim 3, characterised in that said primary signals comprise position signals delivered by position sensors (22, 32) associated with said piloting member, in that the forces imparted to said piloting member are used by way of monitored parameter, and in that at least one theoretical value of inertia forces is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54) as a function of a predetermined computation law linking the second time drift of the position with the force.

18. The method according to claim 4, characterised in that said primary signals comprise position signals delivered by position sensors (22, 32) associated with said piloting member, in that the forces imparted to said piloting member are used by way of monitored parameter, and in that at least one theoretical value of inertia forces is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54) as a function of a predetermined computation law linking the second time drift of the position with the force.

19. The method according to claim 4, characterised in that at least one theoretical value of forces, which is the algebraic sum of said theoretical values of static, damping and inertia forces, is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54).

20. The method according to claim 5, characterised in that at least one theoretical value of forces, which is the algebraic sum of said theoretical values of static, damping and inertia forces, is computed by said monitoring module (53, 54).

9. An aircraft piloting device comprising:

at least one piloting member (20, 30);

at least one fly-by-wire flight control system (40, 41) adapted to generate, as a function of predetermined control laws, signals for controlling actuators of flight control members of said aircraft at least as a function of signals, called primary signals, delivered by sensors associated with each piloting member,

at least one module (53, 54) for monitoring the operation of said piloting device adapted to detect operating anomalies within said piloting device and to generate corresponding monitoring signals, and adapted to;

compute, on the basis of signals delivered by sensors associated with each piloting member and according to at least one predetermined computation law, at least one theoretical value of at least one operating parameter, called monitored parameter, of at least one piloting member;

compare, for each monitored parameter, each theoretical value with measurement signals delivered by sensors associated with at least one piloting member;

select a monitoring action as a function of the difference between each theoretical value and said measurement signals,

characterised in that said at least one monitoring module (53, 54) is integrated into a fly-by-wire flight control system (40, 41), and in that said at least one monitoring module (53, 54) is adapted to compute said at least one theoretical value on the basis of said primary signals.

10. The device according to claim 9, characterised in that at least one monitoring module (53, 54) is adapted to use, by way of monitored parameter, at least one parameter selected from the position of said piloting member and the forces imparted to said piloting member.

11. The device according to claim 9, characterised in that it comprises at least one actuating motor (23, 33) for at least one piloting member and at least one force feedback control unit (60) capable of producing signals, called force feedback signals, for controlling each actuating motor so as to generate a simulated force feedback sensation on said piloting member, and in that said at least one monitoring module is executed by a central processing unit of a fly-by-wire flight control system distinct from said at least one force feedback control unit.

12. The device according to claim 11, characterised in that it comprises at least two piloting members (20, 30) that move along identical degrees of freedom, linked by at least one fly-by-wire flight control system (40, 41) to the same flight control members of said aircraft, and coupled to each other by said force feedback control unit (60).

13. The device according to claim 11, characterised in that at least one monitoring module (53, 54) is adapted to inhibit at least one force feedback actuating motor when the difference between each theoretical value and said measurement signals is greater by absolute value than a predetermined threshold value corresponding to an operating anomaly.

14. An aircraft comprising a piloting device according to claim 9.

15. The device according to claim 12, characterised in that at least one monitoring module (53, 54) is adapted to inhibit at least one force feedback actuating motor when the difference between each theoretical value and said measurement signals is greater by absolute value than a predetermined threshold value corresponding to an operating anomaly.