CASE-BASED REASONING

• US 20150112912A1
• Filed: 10/17/2013
• Published: 04/23/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/17/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Baker Hughes Incorporated (Baker Hughes Company)
• Original Assignee: Verdande Technology AS
• Inventors: Lorentzen, Hkon, Gundersen, Odd Erik, Bach, Kerstin, Srmo, Frode
• Application Number:
  US14/056,575
• Publication Number:
  US 20150112912A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/45
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/04 Inference or reasoning models

Abstract

Disclosed herein is a computer-implemented method in case-based reasoning, CBR, for creating components of a comparison agent for monitoring a situation, the method comprising: obtaining one or more parameter values and comparison information for each of a plurality of features of a case, wherein the comparison information of each feature defines a configuration of a computation unit; and creating, for each of the plurality of features, a computation unit in dependence on the obtained one or more parameter values and the comparison information of the feature, such that the created computation unit is configured to generate an output in dependence on the obtained one or more parameter values and the comparison information of the feature.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method in case-based reasoning (CBR) for creating components of a comparison agent for monitoring a situation, the method comprising:

obtaining one or more parameter values and comparison information for each of a plurality of features of a case, wherein the comparison information of each feature defines a configuration of a computation unit; and

using a computer, creating, for each of the plurality of features, a computation unit in dependence on the obtained one or more parameter values and the comparison information of the feature, such that the created computation unit is configured to generate an output in dependence on the obtained one or more parameter values and the comparison information of the feature.

2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising creating each of the computation units such that each computation unit is configured to receive one or more data streams of parameters and to generate an output in dependence on the values of the one or more received parameters, wherein the one or more data streams comprise information on a monitored situation.

3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising:

obtaining comparison information for one or more aggregate computation units, wherein the comparison information of each aggregate computation unit defines the configuration of the aggregate computation unit; and

creating, in dependence on the obtained comparison information, one or more aggregate computation units, wherein each aggregate computation unit is configured to receive an output generated by at least one of the computation units.

4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the comparison information for each computation unit includes information on how the obtained one or more parameter values and/or received parameter values are to be weighted by the computation unit, and the method comprises creating each computation unit such that the computation unit is configured to weight the obtained one or more parameter values and/or received parameter values in dependence of the comparison information.

5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the comparison information for each aggregate computation unit includes information on how the aggregate computation unit is to weight the values of its inputs, and the method comprises creating each aggregate computation unit such that the aggregate computation unit is configured to weight its inputs in dependence on the comparison information.

6. The method according to claim 2, wherein the comparison information for each computation unit includes a comparison function that specifies the computations that the computation unit is required to perform to generate an output, and the method comprises creating each computation unit such that the computation unit is configured to apply computations with the obtained one or more parameter values and received parameter values in dependence on the comparison function.

7. The method according to claim 3, wherein the configuration information for each aggregate computation unit includes a comparison function that specifies the computations that the aggregate computation unit is required to perform to generate an output, and the method comprises creating each aggregate computation unit such that the aggregate computation unit is configured to apply computations to its inputs in dependence on the comparison function.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the comparison information for each computation unit and the comparison information of each aggregate computation unit are obtained by obtaining metadata of the case.

9. The method according to claim 3, wherein the computation units and aggregate computation units are configured in dependence on a computing graph for the case.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the computing graph is a tree structure or directed acyclic graph.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the case comprises information that describes a situation in one of the finance industry, healthcare industry or energy industry.

12. A comparison agent for monitoring a situation, the comparison agent comprising a plurality of computation units, at least one of the computation units being created according to the method of claim 1.

13. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a computing device, controls the computing device to perform the method of claim 1.