SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING NETWORK-BASED VERSUS EMBEDDED SPEECH PROCESSING

• US 20150120296A1
• Filed: 10/29/2013
• Published: 04/30/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/29/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: AT&T Intellectual Property I LP (AT&T, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: AT&T Intellectual Property I LP (AT&T, Inc.)
• Inventors: STERN, Benjamin J., BOCCHIERI, Enrico Luigi, CASEIRO, Diamantino Antonio, GIULIANELLI, Danilo, GOLIPOUR, Ladan
• Application Number:
  US14/066,105
• Publication Number:
  US 20150120296A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 704/236
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 15/30 Distributed recognition, e.g. in client-server systems, for mobile phones or network applications

Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media for making a multi-factor decision whether to process speech or language requests via a network-based speech processor or a local speech processor. An example local device configured to practice the method, having a local speech processor, and having access to a remote speech processor, receives a request to process speech. The local device can analyze multi-vector context data associated with the request to identify one of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor as an optimal speech processor. Then the local device can process the speech, in response to the request, using the optimal speech processor. If the optimal speech processor is local, then the local device processes the speech. If the optimal speech processor is remote, the local device passes the request and any supporting data to the remote speech processor and waits for a result.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving, at a device having a local speech processor and having access to a remote speech processor, a request to process speech;

analyzing multi-vector context data associated with the request to identify one of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor as an optimal speech processor; and

processing the speech, in response to the request, using the optimal speech processor.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the multi-vector context data comprises one of wireless network signal strength, task domain, grammar size, dialogue context, recent network latencies, recent error rates of the local speech processor, language model being used, security level for the request, a privacy level for the request, a battery charge level, text of partial automatic speech recognition results, a confidence score of partial automatic speech recognition results, a change in network strength greater than a threshold, or available speech processor versions.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the multi-vector context data is based on a set of rules.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the multi-vector context data is based on machine learning.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying a speech processing preference associated with the request; and

when the optimal speech recognizer conflicts with the speech processing preference, selecting a different recognizer as the optimal speech recognizer.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

when the optimal speech processor is the local speech processor, tracking textual content of recognized speech from the local speech processor and a certainty score of the local speech processor prior to completion of transcription of the speech; and

when the certainty score is below a threshold or when the textual content requests a certain function, sending the speech that has been partially processed by the local speech processor to the remote speech processor.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor comprises one of a speech recognizer, a text-to-speech synthesizer, a natural language understanding unit, a machine translation unit, or a dialog manager.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein an intermediate layer, located between a requestor and the remote speech processor, intercepts the request to process speech and analyzes the multi-vector context data.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

refreshing the multi-vector context data in response to receiving the request to process speech.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

receiving a trigger;

based on the trigger, refreshing the multi-vector context data to yield refreshed context data; and

reevaluating which of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor is the optimal speech processor based on the refreshed context data.

11. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform a method comprising;

receiving, at a device having a local speech processor and having access to a remote speech processor, a request to process speech;

analyzing multi-vector context data associated with the request to identify one of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor as an optimal speech processor; and

processing the speech, in response to the request, using the optimal speech processor.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the multi-vector context data comprises one of wireless network signal strength, task domain, grammar size, dialogue context, recent network latencies, recent error rates of the local speech processor, language model being used, security level for the request, a privacy level for the request, a battery charge level, text of partial automatic speech recognition results, a confidence score of partial automatic speech recognition results, a change in network strength greater than a threshold, or available speech processor versions.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein analyzing the multi-vector context data is based on a set of rules.

14. The system of claim 11, wherein analyzing the multi-vector context data is based on machine learning.

15. The system of claim 11, the computer-readable storage medium further stores instructions which result in the method further comprising:

identifying a speech processing preference associated with the request; and

when the optimal speech recognizer conflicts with the speech processing preference, selecting a different recognizer as the optimal speech recognizer.

16. The system of claim 11, wherein each of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor comprises one of a speech recognizer, a text-to-speech synthesizer, a natural language understanding unit, a machine translation unit, or a dialog manager.

17. The system of claim 11, wherein an intermediate layer, located between a requestor and the remote speech processor, intercepts the request to process speech and analyzes the multi-vector context data.

18. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising:

receiving, at a device having a local speech processor and having access to a remote speech processor, a request to process speech;

analyzing multi-vector context data associated with the request to identify one of the local speech processor and the remote speech processor as an optimal speech processor; and

processing the speech, in response to the request, using the optimal speech processor.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the multi-vector context data comprises one of wireless network signal strength, task domain, grammar size, dialogue context, recent network latencies, recent error rates of the local speech processor, language model being used, security level for the request, a privacy level for the request, a battery charge level, text of partial automatic speech recognition results, a confidence score of partial automatic speech recognition results, a change in network strength greater than a threshold, or available speech processor versions.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18, storing additional instructions which result in the method further comprising:

identifying a speech processing preference associated with the request; and

when the optimal speech recognizer conflicts with the speech processing preference, selecting a different recognizer as the optimal speech recognizer.