METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROJECT RISK IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT

• US 20150178647A1
• Filed: 02/24/2015
• Published: 06/25/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 07/09/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Sysenex Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Sysenex Incorporated
• Inventors: WIGGINS, Laurie, HALL, David
• Application Number:
  US14/630,328
• Publication Number:
  US 20150178647A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0635 Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities

Abstract

Disclosed herein is a system and method for project risk assessment. The system and method include collecting project identification information, receiving responses to a single comprehensive query about the project, using the responses to find specific characteristics of a coupled module for performing tasks related to the project, and determining a risk level of the module performing the tasks based on the specific characteristics of the coupled module.

Claims

1. A method for project risk assessment comprising:

collecting project identification information,

receiving responses to a single comprehensive query about the project,

using the responses to find specific characteristics of a coupled module for performing tasks related to the project, and

determining a risk level of the module performing the tasks based on the specific characteristics of the coupled module.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the single comprehensive survey is based on a set of known factors and is applicable to mutually exclusive projects.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein the set of known factors comprise two hundred and eighteen mutually exclusive factors.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the tasks are at least one risk area selected from the group of risk areas consisting of technical, organizational, operational, external managerial and enterprise.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 further comprising producing a generic risk determination based on all of the areas.

6. The method as recited in claim 4 wherein all of the risk areas collectively comprise thirty-one risk categories and wherein all of the risk categories collectively comprise two hundred and eighteen individual risks.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein less than all of the individual risks are considered when determining the risk level.

8. The method as recited in claim 4 further comprising producing a risk level for each of the risk areas.

9. The method as recited in claim 8 further comprising revising the risk level in response to a user request.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the specific characteristics of the coupled module are selected from the group consisting of a history of the coupled module, a bandwidth of the coupled module, available bandwidth of the coupled module, special resources of the coupled module, logistics, quality of resources, reuse of previously used resources, environment, regulatory considerations, geographic concerns and testing results.

11. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the determining step is performed before the project is completed.

12. The method as recited in claim 11 wherein the determining step is performed before the project is begun.

13. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising plotting a risk trend over time during project execution.

14. The method as recited in claim 13 further comprising modifying the determined risk based on the risk trend as the risk trend is plotted.