DRIVING ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING METHOD AND APPARATUS

• US 20150187224A1
• Filed: 10/14/2014
• Published: 07/02/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/15/2013
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Mbfarr LLC
• Original Assignee: Mbfarr LLC
• Inventors: MONCRIEF, RICK L., Behensky, Max Larkin, Harkins, Tomas G., Fuller, Brad Allen
• Application Number:
  US14/513,382
• Publication Number:
  US 20150187224A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/052 characterised by provision for recording or measuring trainee's performance devices for psychotechnics, e.g. for vehicle drivers A61B5/16, A61B5/18
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/24 including display or recording of simulated flight path

Abstract

A system for driver assessment and training comprising a simulator which can be operated by a driver or pilot under test or in training, the simulator displaying scenarios the driver or pilot must drive through or fly through. The inputs of the driver or pilot in reaction to the displayed scenario are fed to a free body model which calculates the resulting movement of the simulated vehicle in the displayed world. Scoring can be by analysis of calculated Fonda curves comparing the driver performance to performances by one or more normative drivers plotted by standard deviation from norm on the vertical axis and sample point on the horizontal axis. Simulator sickness can be mitigated by calculation and display of a mitigation object which partially obscures the virtual scene being displayed. Signature curves give the driver or pilots'"'"' performance at a glance.

Claims

1. A process for using a computer to compare a driver or pilot under test'"'"'s performance against norms of a standard, comprising:

A) using a computer to calculate a Mean or average and a Standard Deviation for each or selected ones of a plurality of Parameters at each or selected ones of a plurality of sample points along a fixed assessment course path through a fictional small town or airspace, said fixed assessment course displayed to and driven or flown along by one or more Normative Drivers or one or more Normative Pilots, said Parameters defining how a Normative Driver or Normative Pilot is controlling his or her vehicle while driving or flying along said path and how the vehicle is responding in response to these control inputs; and

B) using a computer to record the Parameters of a Driver Under Test or Pilot Under Test as he or she drives or flies a simulated vehicle along said path through said fictional small town or airspace, said driving or flying a simulated vehicle along said path being called a scenario.

C) calculating and recording the variances of at least some of said Parameters of said Driver Under Test or Pilot Under Test from the Mean values of said at least some of said Parameters calculated from said drives or flights of said Normative Drivers or Normative Pilots.

2. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of scoring a Driver Under Test or Pilot Under Test by using said variances calculated in step C for at least some of said Parameters recorded for said Driver Under Test or Pilot Under Test, and wherein said path through said virtual world comprises a fixed assessment course.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein said step A is performed during or after said Normative Drivers or Normative Pilots drive or fly through a predetermined path called a fixed assessment course through a predetermined town or airspace.

4. The process of claim 2 wherein said averages or Means and Standard Deviations are calculated at each of a plurality of sample points for each Parameter as said one or more Normative Drivers or Normative Pilots drive or fly along a fixed assessment course, and further comprising the step of storing said Means and Standard Deviations in an NPD file and performing said step of scoring by comparing said variances to data read from said NPD file.

5. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of storing said variances in an NVC file.

6. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of calculating said variances in terms of standard deviations from said Mean for said at least some of said Parameters at at least selected one or all of said sample points, and plotting or displaying on a computer display said calculated variances at all or only selected ones of said sample points along said path, and further comprising the step of scoring said Driver Under Test or Pilot Under Test based upon said variances using any method of scoring.

7. The process of claim 6 wherein said method of scoring is based upon the time of recognition of an event during said drive or flight along said path that requires a DUT or PUT reaction as compared to the time said Normative Drivers or Normative Pilots reacted to the same event.

8. The process of claim 6 wherein said method of scoring uses said variances to assess the reaction time and situational awareness of the DUT or PUT by comparing the time of reaction of said DUT or PUT to one or more events that occur during said drive or flight along said path as indicated by said variances from said Mean of some or all of said Parameters to the variances of the same Parameters for one or more selected Normative Drivers or Normative Pilots who are considered exemplary drivers or pilots.

9. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of receiving and storing self-reports of said Normative Drivers as to how many accidents and tickets they had during a predetermined number of preceding years, and further comprising the step of scoring said Driver Under Test by comparing said variances of said Driver Under Test to the variances of said Normative Drivers and reporting the score in terms of a percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a predetermined number of accidents and less than a predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years.

10. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of receiving and storing self-reports of said Normative Drivers as to how many accidents and tickets they had during a predetermined number of preceding years, and further comprising the step of scoring said Driver Under Test by comparing said variances of said Driver Under Test to the variances of said Normative Drivers and reporting the score in terms of a percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a first predetermined number of accidents and less than a second predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years and the percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a third predetermined number of accidents and less than a fourth predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years.

11. A process for using a computer to compare a driver or pilot under test'"'"'s performance against norms of a standard, comprising:

A) using a computer to calculate a Mean or average and a Standard Deviation for each or selected ones of of a plurality of Parameters at each or selected ones of a plurality of sample points along a path through a simulated small town displayed to and driven along by one or more Normative Drivers, said path being entirely on a fixed assessment course in said small town, said Parameters defining how a Normative Driver is controlling his or her vehicle while driving along said path and how the vehicle is responding in response to these control inputs and recording said Means and Standard Deviations in an NPD file;

B) determining the type of road segment each said sample point on said path driven by said one or more Normative Drivers is in and storing said road segment information in said NPD file for each said sample point;

C) using a computer to record the Parameters of a Driver Under Test as he or she drives a simulated vehicle along a second path through said simulated small town which is at least partially off said fixed assessment course;

D) determining the type of road segment each said sample point on said second path driven by said Driver Under Test is in;

E) for each type of road segment upon which said Driver Under Test drove while driving said second path, extracting the Means and Standard Deviations from said NPD file for at least some of said sample points along the same type of road segment on said fixed assessment course and averaging those Means and Standard Deviations, and repeating the process for each type of road segment driven by said Driver Under Test so as to derive a Normative Reference Normal or Normative Sample Point for each type of road segment driven by said Driver Under Test while driving said second path;

F) for each type of road segment driven by said Driver Under Test which is off said fixed assessment course and on said second path, establishing a plurality of sample points and replicating said Normative Reference Normal at each said sample point, and storing the resulting replicated Normative Reference Normals in a HOPE NPD file.

G) using Means and Standard Deviations from said HOPE NPD file for sample points along road segments driven by said Driver Under Test which are off said fixed assessment course and recorded Parameter data for said Driver Under Test'"'"'s drive on road segments off said fixed assessment course to calculate variances.

12. The process of claim 11 further comprising the step of using Means and Standard Deviations from said NPD file for sample points along road segments driven by said Driver Under Test which are on said fixed assessment course and recorded Parameter data for said Driver Under Test'"'"'s drive on road segments on said fixed assessment course to calculate variances.

13. The process of claim 12 further comprising the step of using said variances to score said Driver Under Test using any method of scoring based upon said variances.

14. The process of claim 12 further comprising the step of storing said variances in an NVC file.

15. The process of claim 12 further comprising the step of calculating said variances in terms of standard deviations from said Mean for at least some of said Parameters at one or all of said sample points along each road segment driven by said Driver Under Test, and plotting or displaying on a computer display said calculated variances at all or only selected ones of said sample points along said path.

16. The process of claim 13 wherein said method of scoring is based upon the time of recognition of an event during said drive along said path that requires a Driver Under Test reaction as compared to the time said Normative Drivers reacted to the same event.

17. The process of claim 13 wherein said method of scoring uses said variances to assess the reaction time and situational awareness of the Driver Under Test by comparing the time of reaction of said Driver Under Test to one or more events that occur during said drive along said path as indicated by said variances from said Mean of some or all of said Parameters to the variances of the same Parameters for one or more selected Normative Drivers who are considered exemplary drivers.

18. The process of claim 13 further comprising the step of receiving and storing self-reports of said Normative Drivers as to how many accidents and tickets they had during a predetermined number of preceding years, and wherein said step of scoring said Driver Under Test is carried out by comparing said variances of said Driver Under Test to the variances of said Normative Drivers and reporting the score in terms of a percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a first predetermined number of accidents and less than a second predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years.

19. The process of claim 13 further comprising the step of receiving and storing self-reports of said Normative Drivers as to how many accidents and tickets they had during a predetermined number of preceding years, and wherein said step of scoring said Driver Under Test is carried out by comparing said variances of said Driver Under Test to the variances of said Normative Drivers and reporting the score in terms of a percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a first predetermined number of accidents and less than a second predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years and the percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a third predetermined number of accidents, and less than a fourth predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years.

20. A process for using a computer to compare a driver or pilot under test'"'"'s performance against norms of a standard, comprising:

A) using a computer to calculate a Mean or average and a Standard Deviation for each or selected ones of of a plurality of Parameters at each or selected ones of a plurality of sample points along a path called a fixed assessment course in a fictional small town, said path being driven along by one or more Normative Drivers driving a simulator which displays said path to said Normative Drivers, said Parameters defining how a Normative Driver is controlling his or her vehicle while driving along said fixed assessment course and how the vehicle is responding in response to these control inputs and recording said Means and Standard Deviations in an NPD file;

B) determining the type of road segment each said sample point on said path driven by said one or more Normative Drivers is in and storing said road segment information in said NPD file for each said sample point;

C) using a computer to record the Parameters of a Driver Under Test as he or she drives a simulated vehicle along a second path anywhere in the world which is completely off said fixed assessment course;

D) determining the type of road segment in which each said sample point on said second path driven by said Driver Under Test resides;

E) for each type of road segment upon which said Driver Under Test drove while driving said second path, extracting the Means and Standard Deviations from said NPD file for at least some of said sample points along the same type of road segment on said fixed assessment course and averaging those Means and Standard Deviations, and repeating the process for each type of road segment driven by said Driver Under Test while driving said second path so as to derive a Normative Reference Normal or Normative Sample Point for each type of road segment driven by said Driver Under Test while driving said second path;

F) for each type of road segment driven by said Driver Under Test while driving said second path, establishing a plurality of sample points and replicating said Normative Reference Normal at each said sample point, and storing the resulting replicated Normative Reference Normals in a HOPE NPD file.

G) using Means and Standard Deviations from said HOPE NPD file for sample points along road segments driven by said Driver Under Test while driving said second path and recorded Parameter data for said Driver Under Test'"'"'s drive on road segments on said second path to calculate variances.

21. The process of claim 20 further comprising the step of using said variances to calculate and display a signature for said Driver Under Test.

22. The process of claim 20 further comprising the step of using said variances to score said Driver Under Test using any method of scoring based upon said variances.

23. The process of claim 20 further comprising the step of storing said variances in an NVC file.

24. The process of claim 20 further comprising the step of calculating said variances in terms of standard deviations from said Mean for at least some of said Parameters at one or all of said sample points along each road segment driven by said Driver Under Test, and plotting or displaying on a computer display said calculated variances at all or only selected ones of said sample points along said path.

25. The process of claim 22 wherein said method of scoring is based upon the time of recognition of an event during said drive along said path that requires a Driver Under Test reaction as compared to the time said Normative Drivers reacted to the same event.

26. The process of claim 22 wherein said method of scoring uses said variances to assess the reaction time and situational awareness of the Driver Under Test by comparing the time of reaction of said Driver Under Test to one or more events that occur during said drive along said second path as indicated by said variances from said Mean of some or all of said Parameters to the variances of the same Parameters for one or more selected Normative Drivers who are considered exemplary drivers who have reacted to an identical event while driving said fixed assessment course.

27. The process of claim 22 further comprising the step of receiving and storing self-reports of said Normative Drivers as to how many accidents and tickets they had during a predetermined number of preceding years, and wherein said step of scoring said Driver Under Test is carried out by comparing said variances of said Driver Under Test to the variances of said Normative Drivers and reporting the score in terms of a percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a first predetermined number of accidents and less than a second predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years.

28. The process of claim 22 further comprising the step of receiving and storing self-reports of said Normative Drivers as to how many accidents and tickets they had during a predetermined number of preceding years, and wherein said step of scoring said Driver Under Test is carried out by comparing said variances of said Driver Under Test to the variances of said Normative Drivers and reporting the score in terms of a percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a first predetermined number of accidents and less than a second predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years and the percentage of time said Driver Under Test drives like a Normative Driver who has less than a third predetermined number of accidents, and less than a fourth predetermined number of tickets in said predetermined number of preceding years.