SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING RESEARCH COLLABORATION CROSS REFERENCE

• US 20150193551A1
• Filed: 01/08/2015
• Published: 07/09/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 01/08/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Joshua Asher Gordon, Leonard Gordon
• Original Assignee: Joshua Asher Gordon, Leonard Gordon
• Inventors: Gordon, Leonard, Gordon, Joshua Asher
• Application Number:
  US14/592,588
• Publication Number:
  US 20150193551A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0482 Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/01 Social networking

Abstract

A system and method for facilitating research collaboration is disclosed. The invention provides an interface configured for enabling the potential research collaborations from the web based resource on the basis of social network aspect and data parameters etc. The present invention further provides a facility of creating a structured database for the collaborated research study with automated outputs for collaborating members. The present invention also enables the user to evaluate, monitor the data and to generate a research study output at any point of time.

Claims

1. A method for facilitating research collaboration, the method being implementable on a computing device, the method comprising:

providing an interface to a user, the interface enabling;

selecting from a list of potential collaborators; and

forming a research collaboration;

providing a database for storage of data by the user and one or more members of the research collaboration; and

enabling processing of the data to produce a research study output.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the list of potential collaborators is sourced from at least one web based resource selected from the group comprising a social networking website, a research website, a university website, a research institute website, and a consultancy website.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising selecting the data to be stored according to one or more parameters selected from the group comprising data scores, satisfaction ratings, angles, growth, loss, ordinal data, continuous data and other type of data.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein processing of the data comprises examining the data using one or more of the following steps:

comparing the data with other data sets available on the web based resource;

comparing the data with predefined historical norms;

evaluating the data as a function of time; and

evaluating relationship of the data with other parameters such as accuracy, consistency, completeness, reviews and internal consistency.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein processing of the data comprises statistical testing of the data using one or more test selected from the group comprising One-sample T-test, D'"'"'Agostino'"'"'s, K-squared test, Jarque-Bera test, Anderson-Darling test, One Sample Median, Chi Square test, Sample t-test, Fisher'"'"'s exact test, Craner-von Mises criterion, Lilliefors test, Kolmogorov-Simirnov test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Peason'"'"'s Chi-squared test, Shapiro-Francia testone-way ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis, Chi-Square goodness of fit, Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed ranks test, McNemar, Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney test, one-way repeated measures ANOVA, Friedman test, repeated measures logistic regression, factorial ANOVA, ordered logistic regression, factorial logistic regression, Simple linear regression, non-parametric correlation, simple logistic regression, multiple regression, analysis of covariance, multiple logistic regression, discriminant analysis, one-way MANOVA, multivariate multiple linear regression, factor analysis, canonical correlation, various measurements of effect size, f-tests (more generally as seen through the list), z-tests, more general paired difference tests, Tukey'"'"'s method, or customized data analysis.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein processing of the data comprises evaluating the data using one or more graphical representations such as bar graphs, pie charts, line graphs, forest plots, funnel plots, receiver operator curves, normal probability plot, streamgraphs, histograms, Venn diagrams, normal probability plots, line or dot plots, matrix plots, tables, pictographs, heat maps, bubble charts, waterfall charts, gap charts, survival curves, pedigree charts, gnatt charts, structure chart, strip charts, nomograms, growth charts, box plots, scatter plots, bi-plots, probability plots, or customized graphical outputs.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising enabling of user to include and/or exclude the randomization of the one or more members selected.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising monitoring the data entered by the user and/or the one or more members to ensure safety of data during the research study.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising one or more of:

making the data available to public;

keeping the data private; and

sharing the data with the one or more members including third parties to verify appropriate research methods applied.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 enabling the user and/or the one or more members to enter the data into a user-defined arrangement such as in tables, columns, or in to tailored data gathering bins.

11. A research collaboration system, comprising:

an interface to enable a user to;

select from a list of potential collaborators; and

form a research collaboration;

a database for storage of data by the user and one or more members of said research collaboration; and

a processor configured to execute instructions stored in a non-transitory storage medium, the processor configured to process the data and facilitating a research study output.

12. A computer program product arranged for facilitating collaborated research, the computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code portions stored therein, said computer-readable program code portions comprising instructions for:

providing an interface to a user, the interface enabling;

selecting from a list of potential collaborators; and

forming a research collaboration;

providing a database for storage of data by the user and one or more members of the research collaboration;

enabling processing of the data to produce a research study output.