AUTHENTICATION FREQUENCY AND CHALLENGE TYPE BASED ON APPLICATION USAGE

• US 20150237047A1
• Filed: 05/04/2015
• Published: 08/20/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 11/19/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Arlington Technologies, LLC (Dominion Harbor Enterprises, LLC)
• Original Assignee: Avaya Incorporated
• Inventors: BENTLEY, Jon Louis, ERHART, George William, O'GORMAN, Lawrence, SAMMON, Michael J., SKIBA, David Joseph
• Granted Patent: US 9,590,985 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/083 using passwords cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication using a predetermined code H04L9/3226
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0846 using time-dependent-passwords, e.g. periodically changing passwords
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0861 using biometrical features, e.g. fingerprint, retina-scan cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication using biological data H04L9/3231
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/3271 using challenge-response
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/06 Authentication

Abstract

An apparatus and method are disclosed for determining authentication frequency (i.e., the length of time between authenticating and re-authenticating a user) and challenge type (e.g., username/password, fingerprint recognition, voice recognition, etc.) based on what software applications a user is running on a data-processing system, and how those applications are being used (e.g., what functions are used, what data is input to or output by the application, how often and for how long applications are used, what input devices and output devices are used, etc.) Advantageously, the illustrative embodiment enables authentication frequency and challenge type to be adjusted based on the likelihood of malicious activity and/or the potential cost of malicious activity, as inferred from current and past application usage. In addition, the illustrative embodiment enables selection of an authentication challenge type that is less intrusive to a user based on current application usage.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

presenting a first authentication challenge at a device at a first time;

determining, via a processor, an authentication type based on one of (i) an identity of an application currently being accessed at the device, (ii) a time duration for which the application is used at the device since the first time, or (iii) input capabilities of the device; and

presenting, at the device at a second time later than the first time, a second authentication challenge of the authentication type.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type is further based on prior usage of the application.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type is further based on a function that is used in within the application.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type is further based on an output of the application.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type is based on how input is supplied to the application.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type is further based on how often the application is used.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type is further based on how often a function of the application is used.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the authentication type comprises a plurality of successive authentication challenges.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the plurality of successive authentication challenges comprises authentication challenges of disparate authentication types.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the authentication type is one of a fingerprint recognition, an iris scan, a retinal scan, a username and password, voice recognition.

12. The system of claim 8, wherein the authentication type is determined further based on prior usage of the application.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the authentication type is determined further based on a function that is used in within the application.

14. The system of claim 8, wherein the authentication type is determined further based on an output of the application.

11. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising;

presenting a first authentication challenge at a device at a first time;

determining an authentication type based on one of (i) an identity of an application currently being accessed at the device, (ii) a time duration for which the application is used at the device since the first time, or (iii) input capabilities of the device; and

presenting, at the device at a second time later than the first time, a second authentication challenge of the authentication type.

15. A computer-readable storage device storing instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

presenting a first authentication challenge at a device at a first time;

determining an authentication type based on one of (i) an identity of an application currently being accessed at the device, (ii) a time duration for which the application is used at the device since the first time, or (iii) input capabilities of the device; and

presenting, at the device at a second time later than the first time, a second authentication challenge having the authentication type.

16. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the authentication type is determined further based on how input is supplied to the application.

17. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the authentication type is determined further based on how often the application is used.

18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the authentication type comprises a plurality of successive authentication challenges.

19. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the plurality of successive authentication challenges comprises authentication challenges of disparate authentication types.

20. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the authentication type is one of a fingerprint recognition, an iris scan, a retinal scan, a username and password, voice recognition.