CONTENT DRIVEN ASYNCHRONOUS EDUCATION

• US 20150243178A1
• Filed: 02/26/2014
• Published: 08/27/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 02/26/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: 2U Incorporated
• Original Assignee: 2U Incorporated
• Inventors: Tuyl, Ian Van
• Application Number:
  US14/190,426
• Publication Number:
  US 20150243178A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 5/02 with visual presentation of the material to be studied, e.g. using film strip
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

A system for asynchronous education content delivery is disclosed. A data store comprises education content associated with a course of learning and sequence data specifying an order for presentation of the content. Education content comprises video recordings of lectures, questions, and model responses. The system receives students'"'"' requests for data, queries the database in order to identify the appropriate content, and transmits the content. The system may require that a student provide input in response to a recorded prompt in order to proceed with a planned course of study. The student'"'"'s inputs are made available to other students and teachers for further review and critique.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented education method, comprising:

a computing system transmitting to a first student a first education recording;

the computing system transmitting to the first student a first recorded request for student response;

the computing system receiving from the first student a response to the first recorded request for student response;

evaluating the response to the first recorded request for student response;

upon determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is acceptable, identifying a second education recording for presentation;

upon determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is not acceptable, identifying a third education recording for presentation; and

transmitting either the second education recording or the third education recording to the first student.

2. The computer-implemented education method of claim 1, wherein determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is acceptable comprises determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is a correct response.

3. The computer-implemented education method of claim 2, wherein determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is a correct response comprises comparing the response to a stored response value.

4. The computer-implemented education method of claim 2, further comprising querying a database comprising data defining sequencing of education recordings and requests for student response for content to be presented after presentation of the first education recording, presentation of the first recorded request for student response, and receipt of a correct response to the first recorded request for student response.

5. The computer-implemented education method of claim 2, wherein identifying a second education recording comprises identifying an education recording that assumes understanding of concepts disclosed in the first education recording.

6. The computer-implemented education method of claim 1, wherein determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is not acceptable comprises determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is an incorrect response.

7. The computer-implemented education method of claim 6, wherein determining the response to the first recorded request for student response is an incorrect response comprises comparing the response to a stored response value.

8. The computer-implemented education method of claim 6, further comprising querying a database comprising data defining sequencing of education recordings and requests for student response for content to be presented after presentation of the first education recording, presentation of the first recorded request for student response, and receipt of an incorrect response to the first recorded request for student response.

10. The computer-implemented education method of claim 6, wherein identifying a third education recording comprises identifying an education recording that addresses a misunderstanding of concepts disclosed in the first education recording.

11. The computer-implemented education method of claim 1, wherein identifying a second education recording for presentation comprises:

identifying a plurality of education recordings;

transmitting information regarding the plurality of education recordings to the first student;

receiving a selection of one of the plurality of education recordings; and

identifying the selected one of the plurality of education recordings as the second education recording.

12. A computer-implemented method of evaluating teaching content, comprising:

receiving from each of a plurality of students a student response to a request for student response;

recording in a database the received student response for each of the plurality of students;

evaluating each received student response and identifying each received student response as either acceptable or unacceptable;

recording in a database for each received student response an indication of either acceptable or unacceptable;

determining an aggregate value corresponding to received student responses identified as unacceptable;

upon determining the aggregate value corresponding to received student responses identified as unacceptable exceeds a threshold, communicating a notification identifying the request for student response.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein receiving from each of a plurality of students a student response to a request for student response comprises receiving a student response from each of a plurality of students over an extended period of time.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein receiving from each of a plurality of students a student response to a request for student response comprises receiving a student response from each of a plurality of students during a period that a course is offered.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein receiving from each of a plurality of students a student response to a request for student response comprises receiving a student response from each of a plurality of students, the plurality of students enrolled in a plurality of classes.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein evaluating each received student response and identifying each received student response as either acceptable or unacceptable comprises comparing each received student response to an acknowledge acceptable response.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein evaluating each student response and identifying each received student response as either acceptable or unacceptable comprises determining whether each received student response is correct.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein communicating a notification identifying the request for student response comprises communicating a notification to an instructor.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein communicating a notification to an instructor comprises communicating a suggestion regarding the request for student response.

20. A computer-implemented method of providing feedback, comprising:

retrieving from a database a student response to a recorded request for student response;

transmitting for output the student response;

transmitting a prompt to provide feedback regarding the student response;

receiving feedback regarding the student response;

receiving input specifying accessibility of the feedback regarding the student response;

storing in the database the feedback regarding the student response; and

storing in the database data specifying accessibility of the feedback regarding the student response.

21. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein retrieving from a database a student response to a recorded request for student response comprises retrieving a video recording of a student response.

22. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein transmitting a prompt to provide feedback regarding the student response comprises transmitting a prompt to enter a video recording.

23. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein receiving input specifying accessibility of the feedback regarding the student response comprises receiving a user interface selection.

24. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein receiving input specifying accessibility of the feedback regarding the student response comprises receiving input specifying the feedback regarding the student response is accessible only by a student that generated the student response.

25. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein receiving input specifying accessibility of the feedback regarding the student response comprises receiving input specifying the feedback regarding the student response is accessible by students in addition to a student that generated the student response.

26. The computer-implemented method of claim 20, wherein receiving input specifying accessibility of the feedback regarding the student response comprises receiving input specifying that the feedback is private.

27. A computer-implemented method of providing student recommendation, comprising:

retrieving from a database a student response prepared by a first student;

transmitting the student response to a second student;

transmitting a prompt to provide recommendation information to the second student;

receiving recommendation information regarding the student response from the second student;

storing in the database the recommendation information from the second student regarding the student response; and

updating in the database aggregate data to reflect the recommendation information from the second student.

28. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, further comprising receiving a request from the second student to review the student response prepared by the first student.

29. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, wherein transmitting a prompt to provide recommendation information comprises transmitting a prompt to indicate whether the second student recommends the recorded response to other students.

30. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, wherein transmitting a prompt to provide recommendation information comprises transmitting a prompt to indicate a ranking of the recorded response.

31. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, wherein transmitting a prompt to provide recommendation information comprises transmitting a prompt to indicate a vote for the best response.

32. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, wherein receiving recommendation information regarding the student response from the second student comprises receiving input specifying at least one of a recommendation, a ranking, a vote.

33. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, wherein updating in the database aggregate data to reflect the recommendation information from the second student comprises updating an aggregate value to indicate another student has recommended the student response.

34. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, wherein updating in the database aggregate data to reflect the recommendation information from the second student comprises updating an aggregate value to indicate another student has voted for the student response.