Systems and Methods for Project Planning and Management

• US 20150254597A1
• Filed: 07/10/2014
• Published: 09/10/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 03/10/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Strategic DNA Advisors Inc.
• Original Assignee: Strategic DNA Advisors Inc.
• Inventors: Jahagirdar, Ketan R.
• Application Number:
  US14/328,390
• Publication Number:
  US 20150254597A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063114 Status monitoring or status determination for a person or group
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063118 Staff planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06313 Resource planning in a project environment

Abstract

A project management system manages a project by continuously monitoring each phase of the project to greatly increase the probability that all required deliverables are produced while adhering to project constraints. The project management system tracks and displays the progress being made and the current status of each deliverable in the project to enable users to easily view and understand the overall project progress along with risks and issues associated with the project in one centralized system The project management system also performs project portfolio management by evaluating individual projects based on various business valuation criteria to correlate the impact of the individual projects to the strategic goals of the business. Accordingly, the project management system provides a system enabled centralized governance framework that enables the users to efficiently plan and manage any type of project.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for project planning and management, the method comprising:

defining, via one or more processors executing a processor-implemented instruction module, a deliverable associated with a project, the deliverable specifying an amount of work that needs to be performed to complete the project;

assigning, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a budget, a planned start date, and a planned end date for the deliverable;

allocating, via the processor-implemented instruction module, one or more workers to perform the amount of work on the deliverable including setting a maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable;

determining, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an available capacity for the one or more workers, wherein the available capacity is determined by;

(i) a reserved capacity based on a first number of hours per day that the one or more workers are scheduled to work on the deliverable, the first number of hours being equal to or less than the maximum number of hours; and

(ii) a free capacity if the first number of hours is less than the maximum number of hours, the free capacity being based on a second number of hours per day that the one or more workers may be able to work on the deliverable such that the sum of the first and second number of hours does not exceed the maximum number of hours;

receiving, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an indication of an actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers;

receiving, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an indication of an estimate to completion (ETC) for the deliverable, the ETC being associated with the one or more workers'"'"' estimation on how much more work that the one or more workers must perform in order to complete the deliverable;

calculating, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an estimate at completion (EAC) for the deliverable based on summing the indication of the actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable;

calculating, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a projected end date for the deliverable based on comparing the available capacity for the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable;

calculating, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a status for the deliverable based on one or more of;

(i) a comparison between the budget and the EAC;

(ii) a comparison between the projected end date and the planned end date;

or (iii) a comparison between the allocation of an actual number of hours and the set maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable between the planned start date and the planned end date; and

displaying, via the processor-implemented instruction module, the status for the deliverable to a user.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

calculating, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a percentage of completion for the deliverable based on dividing the indication of the actual amount of work performed by the one or more workers and the EAC for the deliverable; and

displaying, via the processor-implemented instruction module, the percentage of completion for the deliverable to the user.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the status includes a current status for the deliverable.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the status includes a historical status for the deliverable.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the status includes a current status and a historical status for the deliverable.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the percentage includes an actual percentage and an expected percentage of completion for the deliverable.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the reserved capacity is determined by multiplying the first number of hours per day that the one or more workers is scheduled to work on the deliverable by a number of days remaining until the planned end date, and the free capacity is determined by multiplying the second number of hours per day that the one or more workers may be able to work on the deliverable by the number of days remaining until the planned end date.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein calculating the projected end date based on comparing the available capacity for the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable includes determining the projected end date to be equal to the planned end date if the available capacity is greater than or equal to the ETC, or determining the projected end date to be greater than the planned end date if the available capacity is less than the ETC.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein calculating the status based on the comparison between the budget and the EAC or the comparison between the projected end date and the planned end date includes determining a percentage difference between the budget and the EAC, or a percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein displaying the status includes displaying:

(i) a first indication of the status if the percentage difference between the budget and the EAC or the percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date is within a first range of percentage values;

(ii) a second indication of the status if the percentage difference between the budget and the EAC or the percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date is within a second range of percentage values;

or (iii) a third indication of the status if the percentage difference between the budget and the EAC or the percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date is greater than a third percentage value.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a weight for each deliverable in the project;

determining, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a weighted health score for each deliverable in the project by multiplying the weight for each deliverable with a health score associated with each deliverable; and

determining, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an overall project health score for the project by summing each weighted health score.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein calculating the status based on the comparison between the allocation of the actual number of hours and the set maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable includes determining a percentage difference between the allocation of the actual number of hours and the set maximum number of hours, and the displaying of the status is based on the percentage difference.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the indication of the actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers is based on a number of hours spent on the deliverable.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the indication of the actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers is based on an amount of cost incurred on the deliverable.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, further comprising:

calculating, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a percentage of completion for an asset associated with the project based on the percentage of completion for the deliverable, the asset specifying a desired outcome that is produced when the project is completed; and

displaying, via the processor-implemented instruction module, the percentage of completion for the asset to the user.

31. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein calculating the status for the deliverable is further based on one or more of a number of risks and issues associated with the deliverable, or severity of the risks and issues associated with the deliverable.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium including computer-readable instructions to be executed on one or more processors of a system for project planning and management, the instructions when executed causing the one or more processors to:

define, via a processor-implemented instruction module, a deliverable associated with a project, the deliverable specifying an amount of work that needs to be performed to complete the project;

assign, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a budget, a planned start date, and a planned end date for the deliverable;

allocate, via the processor-implemented instruction module, one or more workers to perform the amount of work on the deliverable including setting a maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable;

determine, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an available capacity for the one or more workers, wherein the available capacity is determined by;

(i) a reserved capacity based on a first number of hours per day that the one or more workers are scheduled to work on the deliverable, the first number of hours being equal to or less than the maximum number of hours; and

(ii) a free capacity if the first number of hours is less than the maximum number of hours, the free capacity being based on a second number of hours per day that the one or more workers may be able to work on the deliverable such that the sum of the first and second number of hours does not exceed the maximum number of hours;

receive, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an indication of an actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers;

receive, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an indication of an estimate to completion (ETC) for the deliverable, the ETC being associated with the one or more workers'"'"' estimation on how much more work that the one or more workers must perform in order to complete the deliverable;

calculate, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an estimate at completion (EAC) for the deliverable based on summing the indication of the actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable;

calculate, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a projected end date for the deliverable based on comparing the available capacity for the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable;

calculate, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a status for the deliverable based on one or more of;

(i) a comparison between the budget and the EAC;

(ii) a comparison between the projected end date and the planned end date;

or (iii) a comparison between the allocation of an actual number of hours and the set maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable between the planned start date and the planned end date; and

display, via the processor-implemented instruction module, the status for the deliverable to a user.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, further including instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to:

calculate, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a percentage of completion for the deliverable based on dividing the indication of the actual amount of work performed by the one or more workers and the EAC for the deliverable; and

display, via the processor-implemented instruction module, the percentage of completion for the deliverable to the user.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the status includes a current status for the deliverable.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the status includes a historical status for the deliverable.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the status includes a current status and a historical status.

21. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the percentage includes an actual percentage and an expected percentage of completion for the deliverable.

22. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the reserved capacity is determined by multiplying the first number of hours per day that the one or more workers is scheduled to work on the deliverable by a number of days remaining until the planned end date, and the free capacity is determined by multiplying the second number of hours per day that the one or more workers may be able to work on the deliverable by the number of days remaining until the planned end date.

23. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein calculating the projected end date based on comparing the available capacity for the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable includes determining the projected end date to be equal to the planned end date if the available capacity is greater than or equal to the ETC, or determining the projected end date to be greater than the planned end date if the available capacity is less than the ETC.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein calculating the status based on the comparison between the budget and the EAC or the comparison between the projected end date and the planned end date includes determining a percentage difference between the budget and the EAC, or a percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein displaying the status includes displaying:

(i) a first indication of the status if the percentage difference between the budget and the EAC or the percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date is within a first range of percentage values;

(ii) a second indication of the status if the percentage difference between the budget and the EAC or the percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date is within a second range of percentage values;

or (iii) a third indication of the status if the percentage difference between the budget and the EAC or the percentage difference between the projected end date and the planned end date is greater than a third percentage value.

26. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, further including instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to:

determine, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a weight for each deliverable in the project;

determine, via the processor-implemented instruction module, a weighted health score for each deliverable in the project by multiplying the weight for each deliverable with a health score associated with each deliverable; and

determine, via the processor-implemented instruction module, an overall project health score for the project by summing each weighted health score.

27. (canceled)

28. A project management system for project planning and management managing a project, the system comprising:

a project management database; and

a project management server, including a memory having instructions for execution on one or more processors, wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the project management server to;

define, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, a deliverable associated with a project, the deliverable specifying an amount of work that needs to be performed to complete the project;

assign, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, a budget, a planned start date, and a planned end date for the deliverable;

allocate, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, one or more workers to perform the amount of work on the deliverable including setting a maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable;

determine, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, an available capacity for the one or more workers, wherein the available capacity is determined by;

(i) a reserved capacity based on a first number of hours per day that the one or more workers are scheduled to work on the deliverable, the first number of hours being equal to or less than the maximum number of hours; and

(ii) a free capacity if the first number of hours is less than the maximum number of hours, the free capacity being based on a second number of hours per day that the one or more workers may be able to work on the deliverable such that the sum of the first and second number of hours does not exceed the maximum number of hours;

receive, via a network connection, an indication of an actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers;

receive, via a network connection, an indication of an estimate to completion (ETC) for the deliverable, the ETC being associated with the one or more workers'"'"' estimation on how much more work that the one or more workers must perform in order to complete the deliverable;

store the received indication of the actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC in the project management database;

calculate, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, an estimate at completion (EAC) for the deliverable based on summing the indication of the actual amount of work performed on the deliverable by the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable;

calculate, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, a projected end date for the deliverable based on comparing the available capacity for the one or more workers and the indication of the ETC for the deliverable;

calculate, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, a status for the deliverable based on one or more of;

(i) a comparison between the budget and the EAC;

(ii) a comparison between the projected end date and the planned end date;

or (iii) a comparison between the allocation of an actual number of hours and the set maximum number of hours per day for the one or more workers to work on the deliverable between the planned start date and the planned end date;

store the calculated status for the deliverable in the project management database; and

display, via a network connection, the status for the deliverable to a user.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the instructions of the project management server, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the project management server to:

calculate, via the one or more processors executing one or more processor-implemented instruction modules, a percentage of completion for the deliverable based on dividing the indication of the actual amount of work performed by the one or more workers and the EAC for the deliverable;

store the calculated percentage of completion for the deliverable in the project management database; and

display, via a network connection, the percentage of completion for the deliverable to the user.

30. The system of claim 28, wherein the status includes a current status and a historical status for the deliverable.