Computer-Implemented System And Method For Externally Evaluating Sizing Of An Indoor Climate Control System In A Building

• US 20150276251A1
• Filed: 03/27/2014
• Published: 10/01/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 03/27/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Palo Alto Research Center, Inc. (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Palo Alto Research Center, Inc. (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Smullin, Sylvia, Apte, Raj, Ready, Steve
• Application Number:
  US14/228,209
• Publication Number:
  US 20150276251A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/30 for purposes related to the operation of the system, e.g. for safety or monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/46 Improving electric energy efficiency or saving
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/58 using Internet communication
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/62 characterised by the type of control or by internal processing, e.g. using fuzzy logic, adaptive control or estimation of values
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/63 Electronic processing
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 2140/00 Control inputs relating to system states
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 15/02 electric
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 23/1917 using digital means
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/04 Inference or reasoning models
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

The recommended running time for an indoor climate control system, such as an HVAC system, for a building is determined. Ideally, the recommended running time reflects the amount of time during each operating cycle that the system ought to run for an indoor climate control system that has been properly sized to the building. Energy usage data of an indoor climate control system are obtained for a time period of interest with a time resolution that reflects the physically relevant time scales. The data is formed into a time series of running times. The running times of the system are compared to the recommended running time to infer the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for externally evaluating sizing of an indoor climate control system in a building, comprising the steps of:

obtaining a recommended running time for an indoor climate control system based on a building'"'"'s type and type of indoor climate control system;

obtaining a usage time series that reflects the indoor climate control system'"'"'s usage over a plurality of operating cycles, each operating cycle comprising a “

go-to-idle”

state transition during which the indoor climate control system transitions from a running state to an at idle state and a “

go-to-run”

state transition during which the indoor climate control system transitions from an at idle state to a running state, the indoor climate control system running for a period of running time between each “

go-to-run”

state transition and the next “

go-to-idle”

state transition, the indoor climate control system remaining at idle for a period of idle time between each “

go-to-idle”

state transition and the next “

go-to-run”

state transition, the running time comprising the time necessary to bring the building'"'"'s interior temperature into a temperature range defined about a desired indoor temperature for the building;

extracting a time series of running times for the indoor climate control system from the usage time series; and

determining an apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system by comparing the running times time series to the recommended running time,

wherein the steps are performed on a suitably-programmed computer.

2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:

defining the usage time series as binary indications of whether the indoor climate control system is running or at idle at any given time.

3. A method according to claim 1, further comprising one of the steps of:

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is oversized for the building;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is undersized for the building; and

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is neither undersized nor oversized for the building.

4. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

defining a typical running time based on the running times time series; and

characterizing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system based on the typical running time, comprising one of the steps of;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is oversized for the building if the typical running time is less than or equal to the recommended running time;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is undersized for the building if the typical running time is more than or equal to the recommended running time; and

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is neither undersized nor oversized for the building if the typical running time is substantially close to the recommended running time.

5. A method according to claim 4, further comprising at least one of the steps of:

rounding the running time of select operating cycles in the usage time series to a different unit of time than used in the usage time series, prior to defining the typical running time;

removing at least one of long operating cycles and short operating cycles from the usage time series, prior to defining the typical running time;

retaining only select operating cycles in the usage time series, prior to defining the typical running time; and

retaining operating cycles in the usage time series for only select hours days, weeks, months, times of the year, or time periods, prior to defining the typical running time.

6. A method according to claim 4, further comprising at least one of the steps of:

ranking the running times in the running times time series and selecting the running time that is at a fixed percentile in the ranked running times time series as the typical running time;

choosing the maximum running time in the running times time series during a fixed period of time as the typical running time;

choosing a mean of the running times in the running times time series during a fixed period of time as the typical running time; and

choosing a mode of the running times in the running times time series during a fixed period of time as the typical running time.

7. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

selecting a subset of the running times time series by identifying those running times in the running times time series that are more than or equal to an upper bound on the recommended running time;

establishing a running time metric based upon the number of identified running times in the subset, the running time metric being fractionally quantified over the total number of running times in the running times time series; and

characterizing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system based on the running time metric, comprising one of the steps of;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is oversized for the building if the running time metric is significantly less than the total number of running times over the total number of running times or equal to zero;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is undersized for the building if the running time metric is near or equal to the total number of running times over the total number of running times; and

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is neither oversized nor undersized for the building if the running time metric is a value intermediate to the total number of running times over the total number of running times.

8. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

selecting a subset of the running times time series by identifying those running times in the running times time series that are less than or equal to a lower bound on the recommended running time;

establishing a running time metric based upon the number of identified running times in the subset, the running time metric being quantified as a ratio expressed over the total number of running times in the running times time series; and

characterizing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system based on the running time metric, comprising one of the steps of;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is oversized for the building if the running time metric is near or equal to the total number of running times over the total number of running times;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is undersized for the building if the running time metric is significantly less than the total number of running times over the total number of running times or equal to zero; and

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is neither oversized nor undersized for the building if the running time metric is a value intermediate to the total number of running times over the total number of running times.

9. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

selecting a subset of the running times time series that are substantially equal to the recommended running time;

establishing a running time metric based upon the number of running times in the subset, the running time metric being quantified as a ratio expressed over the total number of running times in the running times time series; and

characterizing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system based on the running time metric, comprising one of the steps of;

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is either undersized or oversized for the building if the running time metric is significantly less than the total number of running times over the total number of running times or equal to zero; and

concluding that the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is neither oversized nor undersized for the building if the running time metric is a value intermediate to the total number of running times over the total number of running times.

10. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:

adjusting operating parameters of the indoor climate control system to modify operation of the indoor climate control system when running

11. A method according to claim 10, wherein one of the operating parameters adjusted comprises the temperature range defined about the desired indoor temperature, further comprising the steps of:

defining the temperature range around the desired indoor temperature to which a thermostat comprised in the indoor climate control system controls the temperature in the building as a deadband comprising a lower offset that defines a temperature slightly below the desired indoor temperature and an upper offset that defines a temperature slightly above the desired indoor temperature; and

adjusting the deadband when the indoor climate control system is concluded to be oversized.

12. A method according to claim 11, further comprising at least one of the steps of:

increasing the lower offset of the deadband;

increasing the upper offset of the deadband;

decreasing the lower offset of the deadband; and

decreasing the upper offset of the deadband.

13. A method according to claim 10, further comprising the steps of:

re-determining the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system subsequent to the adjusting of the operating parameters; and

comparing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system as determined and the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system as re-determined.

14. A method according to claim 10, further comprising the step of:

choosing an energy consumption reduction offering with respect to the adjusting of the operating parameters.

15. A method according to claim 14, further comprising the steps of:

awarding the energy consumption reduction offering;

re-determining the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system subsequent to the awarding of the energy consumption reduction offering; and

comparing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system as determined and the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system as re-determined.

16. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

finding the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control systems in each of a plurality of other buildings; and

comparing the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system in the building against the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control systems in the other buildings.

17. A method according to claim 16, further comprising the steps of:

obtaining energy usage for the indoor climate control systems of the building and each of the other buildings;

comparing the energy usage of the building to the energy usage of the other buildings; and

upon finding that the energy usage of the building is higher than the energy usage of the other buildings, assessing whether the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system is a contributor to the building'"'"'s higher energy usage.

18. A method according to claim 16, further comprising at least one of the steps of:

assessing skill used in determining the sizing of the indoor climate control system for the known specification of the building in light of the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system;

assessing assumptions based on one or more of building codes, indoor climate control system ratings, and indoor climate control system sizing protocols, as used for proper determination of the sizing of the indoor climate control system for the known specification of the building in light of the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system; and

permitting third parties to advertise or offer products or services with respect to the apparent sizing of the indoor climate control system in the building.

19. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing code for executing on a computer system to perform the method according to claim 1.