BANDWIDTH-CONSCIOUS SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVICES

• US 20150278024A1
• Filed: 03/24/2015
• Published: 10/01/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 04/01/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: CommVault Systems Incorporated
• Original Assignee: CommVault Systems Incorporated
• Inventors: Singh, Parminder, Barman, Siddharth R.
• Application Number:
  US14/667,342
• Publication Number:
  US 20150278024A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1448 Management of the data involved in backup or backup restore
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1451 by selection of backup contents
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1466 to make the backup process non-disruptive
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24578 using ranking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/81 Threshold
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/815 Virtual middleware or OS functionality using virtual machines to implement generic software techniques for error detection or fault masking G06F11/1484
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/84 Using snapshots, i.e. a logical point-in-time copy of the data
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1095 Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/535 Tracking the activity of the user network monitoring arrangements H04L43/00; recording of computer activity G06F11/34
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/61 taking into account QoS or priority requirements

Abstract

Lightweight information management operations described herein enable information management operations to be performed while, e.g., network bandwidth is limited and/or while network bandwidth use is costly. In some implementations, an information management system assigns priority to files/folders/data objects on a client device based on a user'"'"'s interactions with the device. The information management system then performs backup operations on higher priority files/folders/data objects prior to lower priority files/folders/data objects, so that if network bandwidth decreases or is interrupted, the more important data objects are preserved. In some implementations, an information management system synchronizes versions of a data object by sending the difference between two versions of a data object from a client to a server. The server uses the received difference to update one or more copies or instances of the data object.

Claims

1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions which, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method of prioritizing copy operations of data files stored on the computing device, the method comprising:

receiving instructions to enable the computing device to automatically perform the method of prioritizing copy operations of data files on the computing device;

automatically determining, with the computing device, a frequency of access for files or folders stored by the computing device,

wherein determining the frequency of access includes automatically tracking a number of times a user of the computing device accesses each of the files or folders;

assigning at least a high priority level to a first set of the files or folders based on the frequency of access for the files or folders;

assigning at least a low priority level to a second set of the files or folders based on the frequency of access for the files or folders; and

copying the files or folders according to the priority level of each of the files or folders so that at least the high priority files or folders are backed up prior to the low priority files or folders,

wherein the copying includes copying at least the high priority files or folders to a secondary data storage device that is not co-located with the computing device.

2. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein copying the files or folders according to the priority level of each of the files or folders includes transmitting the files or folders to the secondary storage device in descending order of priority.

3. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein setting the priority level for each of the files or folders based on the frequency of access includes sorting all of the files or folders on the computing device in descending order from most accessed to least accessed.

4. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein determining the frequency of access includes reading data object properties from an index of data object properties, the index of data object properties being generated by an operating system of the computing device.

5. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein determining the frequency of access includes:

querying an operating system of the computing device or a file system of the computing device to determine which files or folders are open; and

counting a number of times each data object is opened.

6. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

determining, with the computing device, a recency of access for each of the files or folders,

wherein determining the recency of access includes tracking a time and date when read and write operation requests are received by the computing device from the user for each data object,

wherein setting the priority level for each of the files or folders is based on both the frequency of access for the files or folders and the recency of access for the files or folders.

7. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

determining, with the computing device, a recency of access for each of the files or folders,

wherein determining the recency of access includes tracking a time and date when read and write operation requests are received by the computing device from the user for each data object,

wherein setting the priority level for each of the files or folders includes sorting the files or folders from most recently accessed to least recently accessed.

8. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the frequency of access is determined within a predetermined window of time.

9. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein assigning at least a high priority level and a low priority level for at least some of the files or folders is based on the input received from a user via a graphical user interface,

wherein the graphical user interface communicates the high priority level and the low priority level to a priority management agent.

10. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein assigning at least a high priority level and a low priority lever for at least some of the files or folders is performed by a priority management agent, wherein the priority management agent is configured to override preset priorities for the files or folders when network bandwidth or network throughput is reduced below a threshold.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein assigning at least a high priority level and a low priority lever for at least some of the files or folders is performed by a priority management agent,

wherein the priority management agent is configured to report changes to priorities of files or folders, to a storage manager to enable the storage manager to update one or more storage policies.

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the instructions to enable the computing device to automatically perform the method of prioritizing copy operations of data files on the computer device is at least partially related to a reduced bandwidth availability, including reduced availability of bandwidth for mobile devices.

13. A method of prioritizing backup operations of data objects stored on a computing device, the method comprising:

determining, with the computing device, a frequency of access for the data objects,

wherein determining the frequency of access includes tracking a quantity of read and write operation requests from a user for each data object;

setting a priority level for at least some of the data objects based on the frequency of access for the data objects; and

backing up the data objects according to the priority level of at least some of the data objects so that higher priority ones of the data objects are backed up prior to lower priority ones of the data objects.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein backing up the data objects according to the priority level of each of the data objects includes transmitting the data objects to a secondary storage computing device in descending order of priority,

wherein setting the priority level for at least some of the data objects based on the frequency of access includes sorting all of the data objects on the computing device in descending order from most accessed to least accessed, and

wherein determining the frequency of access includes reading data object properties from an index of data object properties, the index of data object properties being generated by an operating system of the computing device.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein determining the frequency of access includes:

querying an operating system of the computing device or a file system of the computing device to determine which data objects are open; and

counting a number of times each data object is opened.

16. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

determining, with the computing device, a recency of access for each of the data objects,

wherein determining the recency of access includes tracking a time and date when read and write operation requests are received by the computing device from the user for each data object,

wherein setting the priority level for each of the data objects is based on both the frequency of access for the data objects and the recency of access for the data objects.

17. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

determining, with the computing device, a recency of access for each of the data objects,

wherein determining the recency of access includes tracking a time and date when read and write operation requests are received by the computing device from the user for each data object,

wherein setting the priority level for each of the data objects includes sorting the data objects from most recently accessed to least recently accessed.

18. A method of synchronizing multiple instances of a data file within an information management system having at least a first computing device and a second computing device, the method comprising:

determining, with the first computing device, whether a first instance of the data file has been modified;

if the first instance of the data file has been modified, applying a file difference algorithm to determine version differences between a present version of the first instance of the data file and a previous version of the first instance of the data file;

determining whether a communication link between the first computing device and the second computing device will incur charges based on time or data quantity; and

when the communication link between the first computing device and the second computing device will incur charges based on time or data quantity, then transmitting the version differences for the first instance of the data file to the second computing device to enable the second computing device to apply the version differences for the first instance of the data file to a second instance of the data file,

wherein applying the version differences to the second instance of the data file synchronizes contents of the second instance of the data file to match the contents of the first instance of the data file.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

wherein determining whether the first instance of the data file has been modified includes determining whether memory block values have changed,

wherein the memory block values are stored by the first computing device and are representative of contents of the first instance of the data file;

wherein applying the file difference algorithm includes applying the file difference algorithm only to memory blocks storing ones of the memory block values that changed when the first instance of the data file was modified.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the file difference algorithm is an rsync utility that determines differences between the versions of the first instance of the data file,

wherein the second computing device is a secondary storage computing device remotely located from the first computing device,

wherein the second instance of the data file is a secondary copy of the data file,

wherein transmitting the version differences to the second computing device includes transmitting the version differences to a storage manager of the information management system, and

wherein the storage manager forwards the version differences to the second computing device in addition to other computing devices storing additional instances of the data file.

21. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

assigning a higher priority to data files that have been backed up to secondary storage at least once, as compared to a lower priority associated with data files that have not been backed up to the secondary storage at least once; and

monitoring the data files having a higher priority before monitoring the data files having a lower priority, and

wherein the first computing device is a first smart phone and the second computing device is a second smart phone.