VEHICLE MOVEMENT DYNAMICS CONTROL METHOD

• US 20150314759A1
• Filed: 11/27/2013
• Published: 11/05/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 12/06/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Continental Teves AG & Co. OHG (Continental AG)
• Original Assignee: Continental Teves AG & Co. OHG (Continental AG)
• Inventors: Nicolet, Damien, Balazs, Peter
• Application Number:
  US14/649,682
• Publication Number:
  US 20150314759A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2210/12 Friction
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2270/313 with less than three sensors (yaw rate, steering angle, lateral acceleration)
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2270/613 ESP features related thereto
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2270/86 Optimizing braking by using ESP vehicle or tire model
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 8/1755 Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve road vehicle drive control systems for control of driving stability otherwise than by controlling a particular sub-unit B60W30/02

Abstract

A method for controlling the movement dynamics of a motor vehicle, in which a measured transverse dynamics variable is compared with a transverse dynamics variable which is calculated on the basis of a vehicle model, wherein it is checked whether the vehicle is understeering, and in this case the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variables is reduced by increasing braking forces at the wheels of at least the front axle independently of the driver. According to the invention, the time gradient of the braking force at each wheel at which a braking force is increased is selected in accordance with the difference between the measured and calculated transverse dynamics variables. In addition, the invention relates to a brake system for a motor vehicle.

Claims

1. A method for controlling the movement dynamics of a motor vehicle, in which a measured transverse dynamics variable is compared with a transverse dynamics variable which is calculated by a vehicle model, wherein it is checked whether the vehicle is understeering and, in this case, the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable is reduced by building up braking forces at the wheels of at least the front axle independently of the driver, wherein the time gradient of the braking force at each wheel at which a braking force is built up is selected in accordance with the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein understeer is detected if the absolute value of the measured transverse dynamics variable is greater than the absolute value of the calculated transverse dynamics variable by more than an activation threshold value and the signs of the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable agree, wherein the buildup of braking forces independently of the driver is terminated when the difference between the measured transverse dynamics variable and the calculated transverse dynamics variable falls below a termination threshold value, which is, in particular, lower than the activation threshold value.

3. The method as claimed claim 1, wherein the time gradient at least of a first part of the braking force built up at one wheel is selected in a manner proportional to the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable, wherein only the part of the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable which exceeds an offset value is taken into account.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein a proportionality factor of the braking force buildup is selected in accordance with an estimated friction coefficient by a characteristic curve.

5. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein a second part of the braking force built up at one wheel is furthermore built up in accordance with the time derivative of the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable and/or a third part of the braking force built up at one wheel is built up in accordance with the time integral of the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the transverse dynamics variable is the steering angle, wherein the calculated steering angle is calculated by the single-track model at least from the yaw rate and vehicle speed.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the braking force at each wheel or the sum of the braking forces at the wheels is limited to a maximum value in accordance with the estimated friction coefficient and/or with a maximum permissible slip.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the braking force built up and/or the time gradient of the braking force built up at the front wheel on the outside of the bend is less than that at the front wheel on the inside of the bend by in each case an asymmetry value, wherein the respective asymmetry value is selected in accordance with the vehicle speed and/or an estimated friction coefficient and/or the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable.

11. The method as claimed claim 2, wherein the time gradient at least of a first part of the braking force built up at one wheel is selected in a manner proportional to the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable, wherein only the part of the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable which exceeds an offset value is taken into account.

12. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein a second part of the braking force built up at one wheel is furthermore built up in accordance with the time derivative of the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable and/or a third part of the braking force built up at one wheel is built up in accordance with the time integral of the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the transverse dynamics variable is the lock angle of the front wheels or the steering wheel angle, wherein the calculated steering angle is calculated by the single-track model at least from the yaw rate and vehicle speed.

9. A braking system for a motor vehicle, comprising at least two sensors for measuring transverse dynamics variables, such as the yaw rate and/or transverse acceleration and/or steering angle, and a wheel speed sensor at each wheel of the vehicle, wherein at least the wheels of the front axle of the motor vehicle have wheel brakes, which enable braking forces to be built up independently of the driver at individual wheels, wherein an electronic control unit which carries out a method for controlling movement dynamics of a motor vehicle, in which a measured transverse dynamics variable is compared with a transverse dynamics variable which is calculated by a vehicle model, wherein it is checked whether the vehicle is understeering and, in this case, the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable is reduced by building up braking forces at the wheels of at least the front axle independently of the driver, wherein the time gradient of the braking force at each wheel at which a braking force is built up is selected in accordance with the difference between the measured and the calculated transverse dynamics variable.

10. The braking system as claimed in claim 9, wherein the wheels at least of the front axle are connected to an electric motor, or are each connected to an electric motor, and in that the buildup of braking torque is accomplished at least in part by the electric motor or electric motors operated as generators.