EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING

• US 20150323929A1
• Filed: 03/02/2015
• Published: 11/12/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 05/09/2014
• Status: Active Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: BANSAL, SHEFALI, DEY, TAPAN
• Application Number:
  US14/634,952
• Publication Number:
  US 20150323929A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0283 Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL] preventive maintenance, i.e. planning maintenance according to the available resources without monitoring the system G06Q10/06
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06311 Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/109 Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/20 Administration of product repair or maintenance

Abstract

A method, system, and/or computer program product schedules preventive maintenance on a unit of equipment. An outage on a unit of equipment, which is the result of a maintenance operation being performed on a subcomponent of the unit of equipment, is detected. A determination is made that the maintenance operation is a superseding maintenance operation, which renders a subsequently scheduled minor maintenance operation on the subcomponent of the unit of equipment unnecessary. A critical maintenance operation on the subcomponent of the unit of equipment is also identified. Thus, the critical maintenance operation, but not the minor maintenance operation, is performed while executing the superseding maintenance operation on the subcomponent of the unit of equipment during the outage.

Claims

1. A method to schedule preventive maintenance on a unit of equipment, the method comprising:

detecting, by one or more processors, an outage on a unit of equipment, wherein the outage is a result of a maintenance operation being performed on a first subcomponent of the unit of equipment;

determining, by one or more processors, that the maintenance operation is a superseding maintenance operation, wherein the superseding maintenance operation renders a first minor maintenance operation on the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment unnecessary for preventing a failure of the unit of equipment, and wherein the first minor maintenance operation is scheduled after the superseding maintenance operation;

identifying, by one or more processors, a first critical maintenance operation on the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment, wherein the first critical maintenance operation is scheduled after the superseding maintenance operation, and wherein failure to perform the first critical maintenance operation within a predefined period of time of the superseding maintenance operation has been predetermined to cause the unit of equipment to fail; and

performing the first critical maintenance operation, but not the first minor maintenance operation, while executing the superseding maintenance operation on the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment during the outage.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, from at least one sensor on the unit of equipment, a signal describing a state of the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment; and

determining, based on the signal describing the state of the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment, that a maintenance operation on the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment is the first critical maintenance operation.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, from at least one sensor on the unit of equipment, a signal describing a state of the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment; and

determining, based on the signal describing the state of the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment, that a maintenance operation on the first subcomponent of the unit of equipment is the first minor maintenance operation.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying, by one or more processors, a second critical maintenance operation on a second subcomponent of the unit of equipment, wherein the second critical maintenance operation is scheduled after the superseding maintenance operation, and wherein failure to perform the second critical maintenance operation within a second predefined period of time of the superseding maintenance operation has been predetermined to cause the unit of equipment to fail; and

performing the second critical maintenance operation while executing the first critical maintenance operation and the superseding maintenance operation.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying, by one or more processors, a cost of the first critical maintenance operation, a length of time required to perform the first critical maintenance operation at a different outage time from that incurred by the superseding maintenance operation, and a cost of the different outage time to determine a cost of performing the first critical maintenance operation at the different outage time; and

in response to determining that the cost of performing the first critical maintenance operation at the different outage time is greater than a predetermined value, issuing, by one or more processors, a signal approving continued performance of the first critical maintenance operation during the outage.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying, by one or more processors, a cost of the first critical maintenance operation, a length of time required to perform the first critical maintenance operation at a different outage time from that incurred by the superseding maintenance operation, and a cost of the different outage time to determine a cost of performing the first critical maintenance operation at the different outage time; and

in response to determining that the cost of performing the first critical maintenance operation at the different outage time is less than a predetermined value, issuing, by one or more processors, a signal to halt performance of the first critical maintenance operation during the outage.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying, by one or more processors, a length of time between the outage and when the first critical maintenance operation was originally scheduled; and

in response to determining that the length of time between the outage and when the first critical maintenance operation was originally scheduled is greater than a predetermined length of time, issuing, by one or more processors, a signal to halt performance of the first critical maintenance operation during the outage.