Systems, Methods, and Software for Enabling Automated, Interactive Assessment

• US 20150348433A1
• Filed: 05/29/2015
• Published: 12/03/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 05/29/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Carnegie Mellon University
• Original Assignee: Carnegie Mellon University
• Inventors: Ravi, Ramamoorthi, Gatterbauer, Wolfgang
• Application Number:
  US14/726,418
• Publication Number:
  US 20150348433A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/101 Collaborative creation, e.g. joint development of products or services
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/02 of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student

Abstract

Methods, system, and software that enables students to create high quality, automatically gradable questions without requiring any manual rating of questions, while at the same time aiding the learning of the students in each of their interactions with the system. The problem of determining the quality of student-submitted questions may be solved by automatically assigning discrimination scores to questions that indicate the extent to which successfully answering a question corresponds to overall learning achievement, e.g., total score on a set of questions. Students may then be rewarded for creating questions with high discrimination scores (as a proxy of high quality of the question) and/or correctly answering questions with high discrimination scores. A question bank of high-quality automatically gradable questions can be created that can be used in the same or future iterations of a course. Both creating the questions and taking the tests are valuable learning experiences for students.

Claims

1. A method of enabling automated, interactive assessment of one or more of a plurality of untrusted individuals distributed across one or more networks with respect to one or more subjects, the method performed by an assessment management system and comprising:

displaying to one or more individuals of a first portion of the plurality of individuals a prompt for an assessment item including a specification related to the one or more subjects and one or more consistent responses and inconsistent responses to the specification;

receiving at least two assessment items from one or more individuals of the first portion of the plurality of individuals;

displaying to a first individual of a second portion of the plurality of individuals specifications of at least two assessment items received from at least one different individual of the plurality of individuals and prompts for responses to the specifications;

receiving responses to the specifications from the first individual;

displaying to a second individual of the second portion of the plurality of individuals specifications of at least two assessment items received from at least one different individual of the plurality of individuals and prompts for responses to the specifications, wherein the specifications of at least two assessment items displayed to the second individual are the specifications of at least two assessment items displayed to the first individual;

receiving responses to the specifications from the second individual;

determining an assessment result for each response received in response to each respective specification as a function of one or more of a consistent response and an inconsistent response to the respective specification received from the one or more individuals of the first portion of the plurality of individuals;

determining an assessment item quality for each respective assessment item as a function of a correlation between the assessment result for each response received in response to the specification of the assessment item from the first and second individuals and assessment results for responses received in response to a specification of at least one different respective assessment item from the first and second individuals; and

generating and storing an overall assessment of one or more individuals of the plurality of individuals with respect to the one or more subjects as a function of the assessment item quality for at least one assessment item either for which a specification was received from the individual or in response to the specification of which a response was received from the individual.

2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising storing one or more assessment items related to the one or more subjects in a bank of assessment items as a function of one or more of the assessment item quality for each assessment item and an overall assessment of one or more of the plurality of individuals.

3. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

displaying to a trusted individual a prompt for an assessment item including a specification related to the one or more subjects and one or more consistent responses and inconsistent responses to the specification; and

receiving an assessment item from the trusted individual;

wherein displaying specifications of at least two assessment items to the first and second individuals of the second portion of the plurality of individuals includes displaying the assessment item received from the trusted individual to one or more of the first and second individuals.

4. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

displaying an assessment item to an individual;

displaying to the individual a prompt for feedback regarding one or more of the specification of the assessment item, a consistent response to the specification, and an inconsistent response to the specification;

receiving feedback from the individual regarding one or more of the specification of the assessment item, a consistent response to the specification, and an inconsistent response to the specification; and

determining one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item and an overall assessment of one or more of the plurality of individuals as a function of the feedback from the individual.

5. A method according to claim 4, further comprising:

displaying the feedback to an individual;

displaying to the individual a prompt for additional feedback regarding the feedback;

receiving additional feedback regarding the feedback from the individual; and

determining one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, a feedback quality of the feedback, and an overall assessment of one or more of the plurality of individuals as a function of the additional feedback.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein said displaying the feedback to an individual includes displaying the feedback to an individual as a function of one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, a confidence level of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, an assessment result, a confidence level of an assessment result, a feedback quality of the feedback, a confidence level of a feedback quality for the feedback, an overall assessment, and a confidence level of an overall assessment.

7. A method according to claim 4, wherein the individual is a trusted individual.

8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the trusted individual is an educator and the plurality of individuals are students.

9. A method according to claim 4, wherein said displaying an assessment item to an individual includes displaying an assessment item to the individual as a function of one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, a confidence level of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, an assessment result, a confidence level of an assessment result, an overall assessment, and a confidence level of an overall assessment.

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein said displaying an assessment item to an individual includes displaying an assessment item to the individual as a function of an availability of the individual.

11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the individual is a trusted individual.

12. A method according to claim 1, wherein said receiving at least two assessment items from one or more individuals of the first portion of the plurality of individuals includes receiving one or more of a multiple choice, calculated formula, calculated numeric, either/or, matching, multiple answer, ordering, or true/false question.

13. A method according to claim 1, wherein determining an assessment item quality for each respective assessment item includes determining an assessment item quality for each respective assessment item as a function of an overall assessment of one or more individuals of the second portion of individuals.

14. A method of automatedly generating a bank of assessment items through automated, interactive assessment of one or more of a plurality of untrusted individuals distributed across one or more networks with respect to one or more subjects, the method performed by an assessment management system and comprising:

displaying to one or more individuals of a first portion of the plurality of individuals a prompt for an assessment item including a specification related to the one or more subjects and one or more consistent responses and inconsistent responses to the assessment item;

receiving at least two assessment items from one or more individuals of the first portion of the plurality of individuals;

displaying to a first individual of a second portion of the plurality of individuals specifications of at least two assessment items received from at least one different individual of the plurality of individuals and prompts for responses to the specifications;

receiving responses to the specifications from the first individual;

displaying to a second individual of the second portion of the plurality of individuals specifications of at least two assessment items received from at least one different individual of the plurality of individuals and prompts for responses to the specifications, wherein the specifications of at least two assessment items displayed to the second individual are the specifications of at least two assessment items displayed to the first individual;

receiving responses to the specifications from the second individual;

determining an assessment result for each response received in response to each respective specification as a function of one or more of a consistent response and an inconsistent response to the respective specification received from the one or more individuals of the first portion of the plurality of individuals;

determining an assessment item quality for each respective assessment item as a function of a correlation between the assessment result for each response received in response to the specification of the assessment item from the first and second individuals and assessment results for responses received in response to a specification of at least one different respective assessment item from the first and second individuals; and

storing one or more assessment items related to the one or more subjects in a bank of assessment items as a function of the assessment item quality for each assessment item.

15. A method according to claim 14, further comprising generating and storing an overall assessment of one or more individuals of the plurality of individuals with respect to the one or more subjects as a function of the assessment item quality for at least one assessment item either for which a specification was received from the individual or in response to the specification of which a response was received from the individual.

16. A method according to claim 15, wherein said storing one or more assessment items related to the one or more subjects in a bank of assessment items includes storing one or more assessments items related to the one or more subjects in a bank of assessment items as a function of an overall assessment of one or more of the plurality of individuals.

17. A method according to claim 15, wherein determining an assessment item quality for each respective assessment item includes determining an assessment item quality for each respective assessment item as a function of an overall assessment of one or more individuals of the second portion of individuals.

18. A method according to claim 14, further comprising:

displaying to a trusted individual a prompt for an assessment item including a specification related to the one or more subjects and one or more consistent responses and inconsistent responses to the specification; and

receiving an assessment item from the trusted individual;

wherein displaying specifications of at least two assessment items to the first and second individuals of the second portion of the plurality of individuals includes displaying the assessment item received from the trusted individual to one or more of the first and second individuals.

19. A method according to claim 14, further comprising:

displaying an assessment item to an individual;

displaying to the individual a prompt for feedback regarding one or more of the specification of the assessment item, a consistent response to the specification, and an inconsistent response to the specification;

receiving feedback from the individual regarding one or more of the specification of the assessment item, a consistent response to the specification, and an inconsistent response to the specification; and

determining one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item and an overall assessment of one or more of the plurality of individuals as a function of the feedback from the individual.

20. A method according to claim 19, further comprising:

displaying the feedback to an individual;

displaying to the individual a prompt for additional feedback regarding the feedback;

receiving additional feedback regarding the feedback from the individual; and

determining one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, a feedback quality of the feedback, and an overall assessment of one or more of the plurality of individuals as a function of the additional feedback.

21. A method according to claim 20, wherein said displaying the feedback to an individual includes displaying the feedback to an individual as a function of one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, a confidence level of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, an assessment result, a confidence level of an assessment result, a feedback quality of the feedback, a confidence level of a feedback quality for the feedback, an overall assessment, and a confidence level of an overall assessment.

22. A method according to claim 19, wherein the individual is a trusted individual.

23. A method according to claim 22, wherein the trusted individual is an educator and the plurality of individuals are students.

24. A method according to claim 19, wherein said displaying an assessment item to an individual includes displaying an assessment item to the individual as a function of one or more of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, a confidence level of an assessment item quality for an assessment item, an assessment result, a confidence level of an assessment result, an overall assessment, and a confidence level of an overall assessment.

25. A method according to claim 24, wherein said displaying an assessment item to an individual includes displaying an assessment item to the individual as a function of an availability of the individual.

26. A method according to claim 25, wherein the individual is a trusted individual.

27. A method according to claim 14, wherein said receiving at least two assessment items from one or more individuals of the first portion of the plurality of individuals includes receiving one or more of a multiple choice, calculated formula, calculated numeric, either/or, matching, multiple answer, ordering, or true/false question.