System, Method, and Apparatus for Generating Ratings for Material Transportation

• US 20150363841A1
• Filed: 06/11/2015
• Published: 12/17/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 06/11/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hep Shaleapps LLC
• Original Assignee: ShaleApps, LLC
• Inventors: Richie, James Chance, Klenk, Adam M., Christides, Amanda
• Application Number:
  US14/736,583
• Publication Number:
  US 20150363841A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0282 Rating or review of business operators or products

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method, system, and apparatus for providing material transportation efficiency ratings, including receiving haul data for a plurality of hauls made by a plurality of vehicles. The haul data for each haul of the plurality of hauls comprises a haul volume, a haul distance, a haul cost, and a haul time. The method also includes generating, with at least one processor and based on the haul data, a plurality of efficiency ratings comprising an efficiency rating for at least one of the following: each driver associated with the plurality of vehicles, each transportation entity associated with the plurality of vehicles, each haul of the plurality of hauls, or any combination thereof.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for providing material transportation efficiency ratings, comprising:

receiving haul data for a plurality of hauls made by a plurality of vehicles, the haul data for each haul of the plurality of hauls comprising a haul volume, a haul distance, a haul cost, and a haul time; and

generating, with at least one processor and based on the haul volume, the haul distance, the haul cost, and the haul time, a plurality of efficiency ratings comprising an efficiency rating for at least one of the following;

each driver associated with the plurality of vehicles, each transportation entity associated with the plurality of vehicles, each haul of the plurality of hauls, or any combination thereof.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein each efficiency rating is generated based on at least one algorithm comprising the following equation:

(v*d)/(c*t), wherein v is the haul volume, d is the haul distance, c is the haul cost, and t is the haul time.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the haul data is received directly or indirectly from a plurality of mobile devices positioned on or carried within the plurality of vehicles.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein generating each efficiency rating comprises:

determining, for at least one haul and based at least partially on the haul data, a raw rating for at least one of the following;

at least one driver associated with the plurality of vehicles, at least one transportation entity associated with the plurality of vehicles, or any combination thereof;

sorting the raw ratings; and

assigning each raw rating an efficiency rating based at least partially on a range or scale.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein assigning each raw rating an efficiency rating comprises normalizing the sorted raw ratings based on a specified range.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein assigning each raw rating an efficiency rating comprises comparing the efficiency rating with a scale having predefined ranges.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising generating at least one graphical user interface comprising a visual representation of at least one efficiency rating of the plurality of efficiency ratings.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising generating at least one graphical user interface comprising at least one selectable option configured to selectively view at least two efficiency ratings of the plurality of efficiency ratings by at least one of the following:

drivers, transportation entities, routes, or any combination thereof.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the haul time is limited based at least partially on at least one speed limit, thereby discouraging unsafe driving practices.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein each efficiency rating is generated such that it is directly proportional to the haul volume and haul distance, and indirectly proportional to the haul cost and the haul time.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the at least one efficiency rating is for at least one driver over a period of time comprising at least one shift.

12. A material transportation efficiency rating system, comprising:

(a) at least one data storage device comprising haul data, the haul data comprising, for each haul of a plurality of hauls, a haul volume, a haul distance, a haul cost, a haul duration, or any combination thereof, wherein each haul is associated with a truck, a driver, and/or a trucking entity; and

(b) at least one computer comprising at least one processor programmed or configured to;

(i) for each of a plurality of drivers and/or trucking entities, determining at least one efficiency rating based on the haul volume, the haul distance, the haul cost, and the haul time, resulting in a plurality of efficiency ratings;

(ii) ranking the plurality of efficiency ratings based on a scale or range, resulting in ranked efficiency ratings; and

(iii) generating at least one graphical user interface comprising at least a portion of the ranked efficiency ratings.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein each efficiency rating of the plurality of efficiency ratings is determined by at least one algorithm comprising the following equation:

(v*d)/(c*t), wherein v is the haul volume, d is the haul distance, c is the haul cost, and t is the haul time.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein at least a portion of the haul data is received directly or indirectly from a plurality of mobile devices positioned in or carried within at least one vehicle.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein ranking the plurality of efficiency ratings comprises:

sorting the plurality of efficiency ratings with a sorting algorithm, resulting in a sorted order of efficiency ratings; and

assigning each efficiency rating of the plurality of efficiency ratings an efficiency rank based at least partially on the sorted order and a range or scale.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein assigning each efficiency rating an efficiency rank comprises normalizing the sorted efficiency ratings based on a specified range.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein assigning each efficiency rating an efficiency rank comprises comparing the efficiency rating with a scale having predefined ranges.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein each efficiency rating of the plurality of efficiency ratings is directly proportional to the haul volume and haul distance, and indirectly proportional to the haul cost and the haul time.

19. The system of claim 12, further comprising generating at least one user interface comprising at least one selectable option configured to selectively view the plurality of efficiency ratings by at least one of the following:

drivers, transportation entities, routes, or any combination thereof.

20. A computer program product for generating material transportation efficiency ratings, comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising program instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:

obtain haul data for at least one haul made by at least one of a driver and a transportation entity, the haul data comprising a haul volume, a haul distance, a haul cost, and a haul time; and

generate, with at least one processor and based at least partially on the haul data, a plurality of efficiency ratings comprising an efficiency rating for at least one of the following;

each driver associated with the plurality of vehicles, each transportation entity associated with the plurality of vehicles, each haul of the plurality of hauls, or any combination thereof, wherein each efficiency rating is generated such that it is directly proportional to the haul volume and haul distance, and indirectly proportional to the haul cost and the haul time.

21. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein each efficiency rating is generated based on at least one algorithm comprising the following equation:

(v*d)/(c*t), wherein v is the haul volume, d is the haul distance, c is the haul cost, and t is the haul time.

22. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein generating each efficiency rating comprises:

determining, for at least one haul and based at least partially on the haul data, a raw rating for at least one of the following;

at least one driver associated with the plurality of vehicles, at least one transportation entity associated with the plurality of vehicles, or any combination thereof;

sorting the raw ratings; and

assigning each raw rating an efficiency rating based at least partially on a range or scale.

23. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein the at least one efficiency rating is at least partially generated by weighing at least one of the haul volume and the haul distance against at least one of the haul cost and the haul time.

24. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein at least a portion of the haul data is obtained from mobile devices positioned on or carried within the at least one vehicle.