CENTRALIZED AUTOMATIC BIAS CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTIPLE OPTICAL MODULATORS

• US 20160028475A1
• Filed: 07/24/2015
• Published: 01/28/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 07/25/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: NEC Corporation
• Original Assignee: NEC Laboratories America Inc (NEC Corporation)
• Inventors: Zhang, Shaoliang, Yaman, Fatih, Huang, Yue-Kai, Wang, Ting
• Granted Patent: US 9,729,230 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G02F 1/0123 Circuits for the control or stabilisation of the bias voltage, e.g. automatic bias control [ABC] feedback loops
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 10/0775 Performance monitoring and measurement of transmission parameters
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 10/50575 to control the modulator DC bias
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 10/564 Power control
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 2210/075 using a pilot tone

Abstract

A system for centralized automatic bias control for a plurality of modulators, including a coupler for coupling output of each of the plurality of modulators to generate a combined modulator output. A pilot insertion device inserts a pilot tone into each of the plurality of modulators such that a different pilot tone frequency is inserted for each of the plurality of modulators. A monitoring device iteratively monitoring power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a current modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators, and an adjuster device iteratively adjusts the modulator bias for each of the plurality of modulators for which the current modulator bias is determined to be sub-optimal until a threshold condition has been met.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method for centralized automatic bias control for a plurality of modulators, comprising:

coupling, using a coupler, output of each of the plurality of modulators to generate a combined modulator output;

inserting, using a pilot insertion device, a pilot tone into each of the plurality of modulators, wherein a different pilot tone frequency is inserted for each of the plurality of modulators;

monitoring, using a monitoring device, power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a current modulator bias is optimal, based on a threshold condition, for each of the plurality of modulators;

adjusting, using an adjuster device, the current modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators; and

iterating the monitoring and adjusting until the threshold condition has been met.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring, using the monitoring device, power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a second type of modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

adjusting, using the adjuster device, the second type of modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators; and

iterating the monitoring and adjusting until a threshold condition has been met for the second type of modulator bias.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring, using the monitoring device, power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a phase type modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

adjusting, using the adjuster device, the phase type modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators; and

iterating the monitoring and adjusting until a threshold condition has been met for the phase type modulator bias.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

sampling the combined modulator output using a single analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for the plurality of modulators, the ADC being configured to differentiate the modulators from the pilot tones.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the inserted pilot tones are 2^nd-order pilot tones.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the modulator bias is determined to be optimal if the power of the inserted pilot tone being monitored is larger than that of a previously measured power.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the coupler is an optical coupler.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the inserted pilot tones are 1^st-order pilot tones, and are selected for each of the plurality of modulators such that frequencies of the inserted pilot tones are different from frequencies of generated 2^nd-order pilot tones.

9. A system for centralized automatic bias control for a plurality of modulators, comprising:

a coupler for coupling a respective output of each of the plurality of modulators to generate a combined modulator output;

a pilot insertion device for inserting a pilot tone into each of the plurality of modulators, wherein a different pilot tone frequency is inserted for each of the plurality of modulators;

a monitoring device for iteratively monitoring power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a current modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

an adjuster device for iteratively adjusting the current modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators until a threshold condition has been met.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the monitoring device iteratively monitors power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a second type of modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

and

wherein the adjuster device iteratively adjusts the second type of modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators until a threshold condition has been met for the second type of modulator bias.

11. The system of claim 9, wherein the monitoring device iteratively monitors power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a phase type modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

and

wherein the adjuster device iteratively adjusts the phase type modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators until a threshold condition has been met for the phase type modulator bias.

12. The system of claim 9, further comprising:

a single analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for sampling the combined modulator output for the plurality of modulators, the ADC being configured to differentiate the modulators from the pilot tones.

13. The system of claim 9, wherein the inserted pilot tones are 2^nd-order pilot tones.

14. The system of claim 9, wherein the modulator bias is determined to be optimal if the power of the inserted pilot tone being monitored is larger than that of a previously measured power.

15. The system of claim 10, wherein the current modulator bias is an in-phase bias, and the second type of modulator bias is a quadrature bias.

16. The system of claim 9, wherein the inserted pilot tones are 1^st-order pilot tones, and are selected for each of the plurality of modulators such that frequencies of the inserted pilot tones are different from frequencies of generated 2^nd-order pilot tones.

17. A computer-readable storage medium comprising a computer readable program, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to perform the steps of:

coupling, using a coupler, output of each of the plurality of modulators to generate a combined modulator output;

inserting, using a pilot insertion device, a pilot tone into each of the plurality of modulators, wherein a different pilot tone frequency is inserted for each of the plurality of modulators;

monitoring, using a monitoring device, power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a current modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

adjusting, using an adjuster device, the current modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators; and

iterating the monitoring and adjusting until a threshold condition has been met.

18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, further comprising:

monitoring, using the monitoring device, power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a second type of modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

adjusting, using the adjuster device, the second type of modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators; and

iterating the monitoring and adjusting until a threshold condition has been met for the second type of modulator bias.

19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, further comprising:

monitoring, using the monitoring device, power (P_t) of each inserted pilot tone over time to determine whether a phase type modulator bias is optimal for each of the plurality of modulators;

adjusting, using the adjuster device, the phase type modulator bias determined to be sub-optimal for each of the plurality of modulators; and

iterating the monitoring and adjusting until a threshold condition has been met for the phase type modulator bias.

20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, further comprising:

sampling the combined modulator output using a single analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for the plurality of modulators, the ADC being configured to differentiate the modulators from the pilot tones.