METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSEFUL COMPUTING

• US 20160034305A1
• Filed: 03/14/2014
• Published: 02/04/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Advanced Elemental Technologies, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Advanced Elemental Technologies, Inc.
• Inventors: SHEAR, Victor Henry, WILLIAMS, Peter Robert, RHO, Jaisook, REDMOND, Timothy St. John, HORNING, James Jay
• Granted Patent: US 9,904,579 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/245 Query processing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/248 Presentation of query results
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/285 Clustering or classification
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/31 User authentication
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2141 Access rights, e.g. capability lists, access control lists, access tables, access matrices
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/50 Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/70 Admission control; Resource allocation
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/83 based on usage prediction
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/101 Access control lists [ACL]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/20 for managing network security; network security policies in general filtering policies H04L63/0227

Abstract

A system, method, and computer-readable storage medium configured to facilitate user purpose in a computing architecture.

Claims

1. A computing method comprising:

receiving, with a computing arrangement, a specification that forms at least one user purpose specification as caused at least in part by a user;

performing a matching or other evaluation process set, between at least a portion of the user purpose specification and at least portions of plural independent stakeholder purpose specifications, specified respectively by plural stakeholders for their resources;

displaying or otherwise providing at least a portion of the matching or other evaluation process set result to the user.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein such user purpose specification comprises, at least in part, at least one verb and at least one domain category, together comprising an approximation of user purpose.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein such matching or other evaluation processing set is performed, at least in part, employing a predetermined classification arrangement established, at least in part, by general or domain specific experts.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein such received specification has been formed, at least in part, employing at least one user purpose related expert created purpose specification.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of such result has been classified as a member of a purpose class.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the identified resource set is a Contextual Purpose Expression (CPE).

7. The method of claim 1, wherein such user purpose specification includes or uses a Repute purpose assertion specification, wherein such Repute specification information structure includes a persistent asserter/publisher identity, a purpose expression specification, and/or a subject matter identifier.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein performing a matching or other evaluation process set, includes using one or more Repute assertion specifications to determine, at least in part, optimum purpose responsive results.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein such Repute specification information structure includes a persistent asserter/publisher identity, a purpose expression specification, and a subject matter identifier.