BIMANUAL COMPUTER GAMES SYSTEM FOR DEMENTIA SCREENING

• US 20160038075A1
• Filed: 08/31/2015
• Published: 02/11/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 09/21/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Bright Cloud International Corporation
• Original Assignee: Bright Cloud International Corporation
• Inventors: Burdea, Grigore C., House, Gregory P.
• Granted Patent: US 10,694,990 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4088 Diagnosing of monitoring cognitive diseases, e.g. Alzheimer, prion diseases or dementia
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/211 using inertial sensors, e.g. accelerometers or gyroscopes
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/24 Constructional details thereof, e.g. game controllers with detachable joystick handles
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/44 involving timing of operations, e.g. performing an action within a time slot
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/67 adaptively or by learning from player actions, e.g. skill level adjustment or by storing successful combat sequences for re-use
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 5/00 Electrically-operated educational appliances working with questions and answers G09B7/00; simulators G09B9/00; advertising or displaying in general G09F
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/70 relating to mental therapies, e.g. psychological therapy or autogenous training
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/63 for local operation

Abstract

The majority of cognitive virtual reality (VR) applications have been for therapy, and not cognitive screening/scoring. Provided herein is the BrightScreener™ and its first pilot feasibility study for evaluating elderly with various degrees of cognitive impairment. BrightScreener is a portable (laptop-based) serious-gaming system which incorporates a bimanual game interface for more ecological 3D interaction with virtual worlds. A pilot study determined that BrightScreener is able to differentiate levels of cognitive impairment based solely on game performance, as well as to evaluate the technology acceptance by the target population. Subsequent group analysis of the Pearson correlation coefficient showed a high degree of correlation between the subjects'"'"' MMSE scores and their Composite Game Scores (0.90, |P|<0.01). Despite the small sample size (n=11), results suggest that serious-gaming strategies can be used as a digital technique to stratify levels of Cognitive Impairment. This may be an alternative to conventional standardized scoring for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, especially for patients with hearing and speech deficits.

Claims

1. A system of screening a patient for cognitive impairment comprising:

a computer;

a videogame executing on the computer;

a display portraying action from the videogame, the action being viewable by the patient;

a game controller connected to the computer having one or more hand-held components with a button or trigger, wherein the hand-held components can be moved independently from one another;

the game controller adapted to send to the computer one or more signals representative of a position of the hand-held component and a position of the button or trigger on the hand held component;

the game controller adapted to send the one or more signals as the patient changes the position of the hand-held component and the position of the button or trigger on the hand-held component in response to action from the videogame;

the computer adapted to quantify a measure of cognitive impairment based on the one or more signals received by the controller and by compounding performance in one or more games.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer measures the amount of time it takes a patient to complete a task in the videogame and uses the time to generate a testing score of cognitive impairment.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer measures the precision of movement of the controller during performance of a task on the videogame and uses that quantified precision of movement to generate a testing score of cognitive function.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer measures the precision of movement of the controller during performance of a task in the video game and measures the time it takes a patient to complete the task in the video game and uses the quantified precision and quantified time to generate a testing score of cognitive impairment.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer accounts for the uni-manual or bimanual interaction modality with the one or more video games and adjusts the testing score accordingly.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer adjusts the measure of cognitive impairment based on the difficulty of the task performed in the video game.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer quantifies cognitive impairment based on the patient'"'"'s performance in two or more different types of games by computing an aggregate or compound score for the evaluation session

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer quantifies cognitive impairment of the patient into one of the following cognitive bands:

normal;

mild cognitive impairment;

moderate cognitive impairment;

severe cognitive impairment.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the game controller comprises two hand-held components with a button, wherein the hand-held components can be moved independently from one another in each hand of the patient.

10. A method of screening a patient for cognitive impairment comprising the steps of:

executing a video game on a computer and portraying action from the videogame on a display, the action on the display being viewable by the patient;

the patient holding a game controller comprising one or more hand-held components having a button or trigger, wherein the hand-held components can be moved independently;

the patient performing an action in the video game by moving the relative position of the hand-held component and manipulating the button or trigger on the hand-held component;

the computer receiving a signal from the controller representative of the position of the hand-held component and the manipulation of the button or trigger;

the computer calculating a degree of cognitive impairment by quantifying the movement of the hand-held component and quantifying manipulation of the button or trigger on the hand-held component as they map to avatars in the games.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer measuring the amount of time it takes a patient to complete a task in the videogame and using that time to generate a testing score of cognitive impairment.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer measuring the precision of movement of the controller during performance of a task on the videogame and using that quantified precision of movement to generate a testing score of cognitive function.

13. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer measuring the precision of movement of the controller during performance of a task in the video game and measuring the time it takes a patient to complete the task in the video game and using the quantified precision and quantified time to generate a testing score of cognitive impairment.

14. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer adjusting the measure of cognitive impairment based on the difficulty of the task performed in the video game, and averaging performance scoring over a multitude of games played at different difficulty levels in a given evaluation session.

15. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer quantifying cognitive impairment based on the patient'"'"'s performance in two or more different types of games.

16. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer quantifying cognitive impairment based on the patient'"'"'s performance, said performance being measured after the patient had undergone a tutorial session such that learning artifacts are minimized.

17. The method of claim 10, further comprising the computer quantifying cognitive impairment of the patient into one of the following cognitive bands:

normal;

mild cognitive impairment;

moderate cognitive impairment;

severe cognitive impairment.

18. The method of claim 10, wherein the controller comprises two hand-held components with a button, wherein the hand-held components can be moved independently from one another in each hand of the patient.