COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION SYSTEM

• US 20160063049A1
• Filed: 08/26/2014
• Published: 03/03/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 08/26/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Bank of America Corp.
• Original Assignee: Bank of America Corp.
• Inventors: Vijayasekaran, Vimal, Kaliyan, Rathi, Ramanathan, Rajesh, Ramraj, Arthi, Shaik, Masthanbee
• Granted Patent: US 9,652,489 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/2365 Ensuring data consistency and integrity

Abstract

In one embodiment, a system including a memory and processor is provided. The memory stores a plurality of quality rules and control rules. The processor receives a request comprising a plurality of parameters and data elements. The processor determines that the request is missing a first data element and that a second data element of the plurality of data elements is corrupt. The processor determines that a first number of data elements should have been communicated and a third number of data elements should have been processed. The processor determines that a second number of data elements were communicated and a fourth number of data elements were processed. The processor generates a report indicating that: the plurality of parameters is missing the first data element, the second data element is corrupt, the first number is less than the second number, and the fourth number is less than the third number.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a memory operable to store;

a plurality of quality rules associated with missing data elements or corrupt elements; and

a plurality of control rules associated with communicated data elements or processed data elements; and

a processor communicatively coupled to the memory and operable to;

receive a request comprising a plurality of parameters and a plurality of data elements;

in response to the request, determine, based at least in part upon at least one parameter of the plurality of parameters, that at least one quality rule of the plurality of quality rules should be applied and at least one control rule of the plurality of control rules should be applied;

in response to the request, determine, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter and the at least one quality rule, that the request is missing a first data element;

in response to the request, determine, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter and the at least one quality rule, that a second data element of the plurality of data elements is corrupt;

determine, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter, that a first number of data elements should have been communicated;

determine, based at least in part upon the at least one control rule, that a second number of data elements were communicated, wherein the second number is less than the first number;

determine, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter, that a third number of data elements should have been processed;

determine, based at least in part upon the at least one control rule, that a fourth number of data elements were processed, wherein the fourth number is less than the third number; and

generate a report indicating that;

the plurality of parameters is missing the first data element;

the second data element is corrupt;

the first number is less than the second number; and

the fourth number is less than the third number.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further operable to generate a log indicating that:

the request was checked for missing data elements;

the request was checked for corrupt data elements;

a number of communicated data elements was checked; and

a number of processed data elements was checked.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further operable to:

generate an alert indicating that;

the request is missing the first data element;

the second data element is corrupt;

the second number is less than the first number; and

the fourth number is less than the third number; and

communicate the alert.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein:

the memory is further operable to store a threshold level; and

the processor is further operable to;

determine an alert level based at least in part upon;

the determination that the request is missing a first data element;

the determination that the second data element is corrupt;

a determination that the second number is less than the first number; and

a determination that the fourth number is less than the third number;

compare the alert level to the threshold level; and

deny the request based at least in part upon the comparison of the alert level and the threshold level.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further operable to determine, based at least in part upon the at least one quality rule, that the second data element exceeds a threshold.

6. They system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further operable to determine that at least one of a number of missing data elements and a number of corrupt data elements exceeds a threshold.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further operable to change at least one of the at least one quality rule and the at least one control rule.

8. They system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further operable to determine, based at least in part upon the at least one parameters, that the second data element was corrupted during communication.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of parameters indicate the first number and the third number.

10. A method comprising:

storing, by a memory, a plurality of quality rules associated with missing data elements or corrupt elements; and

storing, by the memory, a plurality of control rules associated with communicated data elements or processed data elements; and

receiving a request comprising a plurality of parameters and a plurality of data elements;

in response to the request, determining, by a processor, based at least in part upon at least one parameter of the plurality of parameters, that at least one quality rule of the plurality of quality rules should be applied and at least one control rule of the plurality of control rules should be applied;

in response to the request, determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter and the at least one quality rule, that the request is missing a first data element;

in response to the request, determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter and the at least one quality rule, that a second data element of the plurality of data elements is corrupt;

determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter, that a first number of data elements should have been communicated;

determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one control rule, that a second number of data elements were communicated, wherein the second number is less than the first number;

determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one parameter, that a third number of data elements should have been processed;

determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one control rule, that a fourth number of data elements were processed, wherein the fourth number is less than the third number; and

generating a report indicating that;

the plurality of parameters is missing the first data element;

the second data element is corrupt;

the first number is less than the second number; and

the fourth number is less than the third number.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising generating a log indicating that:

the request was checked for missing data elements;

the request was checked for corrupt data elements;

a number of communicated data elements was checked; and

a number of processed data elements was checked.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

generating an alert indicating that;

the request is missing the first data element;

the second data element is corrupt;

the second number is less than the first number; and

the fourth number is less than the third number; and

communicating the alert;

13. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

storing, by the memory, a threshold level;

determining, by the processor, an alert level based at least in part upon;

the determination that the request is missing a first data element;

the determination that the second data element is corrupt;

a determination that the second number is less than the first number; and

a determination that the fourth number is less than the third number;

comparing, by the processor, the alert level to the threshold level; and

denying, by the processor, the request based at least in part upon the comparison of the alert level and the threshold level.

14. The method of claim 10, further comprising determining, by the processor, based at least in part upon the at least one quality rule, that the second data element exceeds a threshold.

15. They method of claim 10, further comprising determining that at least one of a number of missing data elements and a number of corrupt data elements exceeds a threshold.

16. The method of claim 10, further comprising changing at least one of the at least one quality rule and the at least one control rule.

17. They method of claim 10, further comprising determining, based at least in part upon the at least one parameters, that the second data element was corrupted during communication.

18. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of parameters indicate the first number and the third number.