METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONFIGURING A METHANOL PRODUCTION FACILITY

• US 20160063414A1
• Filed: 09/02/2014
• Published: 03/03/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 09/02/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: L'Air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'Etude et L'Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude (L'Air Liquide SA)
• Original Assignee: Air Liquide Global E&C Solutions Germany GmbH (Air Liquide SA), Air Liquide Global E&C Solutions US, Inc. (L'Air Liquide SA), Air Liquide Large Industries U S LP (L'Air Liquide SA), L'Air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'Etude et L'Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude (L'Air Liquide SA)
• Inventors: GRONEMANN, Veronika, GUILLARD, Alain, ROESCH, Alexander, ANDERSON, Erik Jon, ARIYAPADI, Siva, FUENTES, Francois, KRIMLOWSKI, Paul Manfred, PERLWITZ, Jakob Balthasar, PUNWASI, Krishna Anand, SONI, Bharatkumar, STURM, Etienne Jean
• Application Number:
  US14/475,054
• Publication Number:
  US 20160063414A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06313 Resource planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0635 Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/845 Inventory and reporting systems for greenhouse gases [GHG]

Abstract

A method includes receiving input corresponding to a proposed configuration of a methanol production facility and identifying a plurality of components utilized to produce methanol at the facility. The method includes determining an alternative configuration that is different from the proposed configuration. Determining the alternative configuration may include identifying resources accessible to a proposed location for the methanol production facility and whether at least one of the resources accessible to the proposed location corresponds to a resource generated by a component identified by the proposed configuration, and determining whether to omit at least one component of the plurality of components identified by the proposed configuration. The method includes omitting the at least one component from the alternative configuration, and generating a report based on the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration. The report includes information indicating a difference between the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving one or more inputs corresponding to a proposed configuration of a methanol production facility, wherein the proposed configuration identifies a plurality of components utilized to produce methanol at the methanol production facility when configured according to the proposed configuration;

determining an alternative configuration of the methanol production facility, wherein the alternative configuration is different from the proposed configuration, and wherein determining the alternative configuration includes;

identifying, based on data stored at a database, resources accessible to a proposed location for the methanol production facility, wherein the identified resources are accessible from at least one source external to the methanol production facility, and wherein the identified resources are utilized to produce methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

determining whether at least one identified resource of the resources accessible to the proposed location corresponds to a resource generated by the at least one component during production of methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration; and

determining, based at least in part on the identified resources accessible to the proposed location, whether to omit at least one component of the plurality of components identified by the proposed configuration; and

omitting the at least one component from the alternative configuration of the methanol production facility in response to a determination that the at least one identified resource corresponds to the resource generated by the at least one component; and

generating a report based on the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration, wherein the report includes information indicating a difference between the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether to omit the at least one component includes determining whether omitting the at least one component from the alternative configuration reduces an amount of carbon dioxide emission of the methanol production facility below a threshold level of carbon dioxide emissions, wherein the at least one component is omitted from the alternative configuration in response to a determination that omitting the at least one component from the alternative configuration reduces the amount of carbon dioxide emission of the methanol production facility below the threshold level of carbon dioxide emissions.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the methanol production facility, when configured according to the alternative configuration, produces at least a same amount of methanol per unit of feedstock as the methanol production facility when configured according to the proposed configuration, and wherein the methanol production facility produces the methanol from the feedstock.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the at least one component omitted from the alternative configuration generates the resource by consuming a portion of the feedstock during production of methanol using the proposed configuration, wherein omitting the at least one component prevents consumption of the portion of the feedstock during production of methanol using the alternative configuration, and wherein the methanol production facility, when configured according to the alternative configuration, produces a greater amount of methanol per unit of feedstock than an amount of methanol per unit of feedstock produced by the methanol production facility when configured according to the proposed configuration.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the method includes determining scheduling information that includes a schedule for subsequently adding the at least one component to the methanol production facility during a period of time.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the at least one component includes a scalable component including a plurality of sub-components, and wherein the method includes:

determining whether to add all of the plurality of sub-components included in the scalable component at once or to upgrade the scalable component incrementally, wherein upgrading the scalable component incrementally includes adding a first sub-component of the plurality of sub-components at a first time and adding a second sub-component of the plurality of sub-components at second time subsequent to the first time; and

in response to a determination to upgrade the scalable component incrementally, generating a time table for incrementally upgrading the scalable component during the period of time, wherein the time table is included in the schedule.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein an estimated OpEx associated with the scalable component decreases as the scalable component is upgraded according to the schedule, and wherein the report includes cost information that accounts for changes in the estimated OpEx associated with upgrading the scalable component.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the method includes:

estimating, based on the proposed configuration, a first cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

estimating a second cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the proposed configuration over a period of time;

estimating, based on the alternative configuration, a third cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the alternative configuration, wherein the third cost is lower than the first cost; and

estimating a fourth cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the alternative configuration over the period of time, wherein the fourth cost is higher than the second cost,

wherein the report includes first cost information representative of a difference between the first cost and the third cost and second cost information representative of a difference between the second cost and the fourth cost over the period of time.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the resources accessible to the proposed location correspond to resources provided via one or more pipelines, and wherein determining identifying the resources available to the proposed location includes:

determining a distance between each of the one or more pipelines and the proposed location; and

determining whether a distance between the proposed location each of the one or more pipelines is within a threshold distance; and

designating pipelines within the threshold distance as accessible pipelines, wherein resources provided by accessible pipelines are identified as the resources accessible to the proposed location.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein determining whether to omit the at least one component includes:

determining a cost of building infrastructure from the proposed location to each of the accessible pipelines;

selecting a subset of pipelines from among the accessible pipelines, wherein selection of a particular pipeline for inclusion in the subset of pipelines is based on the particular pipeline being associated with a lowest infrastructure cost, the infrastructure cost corresponding to a cost of building infrastructure from the proposed location to the particular pipeline, and wherein the subset of pipelines includes a single pipeline for each of the resources accessible to the proposed location; and

generating the third cost, based at least in part on infrastructure costs associated with each of the subset of pipelines.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the method includes identifying one or more alternative locations for the methanol production facility based on an analysis of resources accessible to each of the one or more alternative locations, wherein each of the one or more alternative locations is accessible to a greater number of resources utilized in the production of methanol using the methanol production facility as compared to the proposed location.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the method includes:

determining at least one additional alternative configuration of the methanol production facility, wherein the at least one additional alternative configuration is different from the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration;

estimating, based on the at least one additional alternative configuration, at least one additional cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the at least one additional alternative configuration, wherein the third cost is lower than at least the first cost; and

estimating at least one additional cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the at least one additional alternative configuration over a period of time.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the method includes, calculating an internal rate of return (IRR) for each of the configurations of the methanol production facility, wherein the report includes information indicating the IRR calculated for each of the configurations of the methanol production facility.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein the report includes a first set of additional cost information representative of a difference between the first cost and the at least one additional cost corresponding to the amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the at least one additional alternative configuration and a difference between the second cost and the at least one additional cost corresponding to the operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the at least one additional alternative configuration over the period of time.

15. An apparatus comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising;

receiving one or more inputs corresponding to a proposed configuration of a methanol production facility, wherein the proposed configuration identifies a plurality of components utilized to produce methanol at the methanol production facility when configured according to the proposed configuration;

determining an alternative configuration of the methanol production facility, wherein the alternative configuration is different from the proposed configuration, and wherein determining the alternative configuration includes;

identifying, based on data stored at a database, resources accessible to a proposed location for the methanol production facility, wherein the identified resources are accessible from at least one source external to the methanol production facility, and wherein the identified resources are utilized during production of methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

determining whether at least one identified resource of the resources accessible to the proposed location corresponds to a resource generated by the at least one component during production of methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration; and

determining, based at least in part on the identified resources accessible to the proposed location, whether to omit at least one component of the plurality of components identified by the proposed configuration; and

omitting the at least one component from the alternative configuration of the methanol production facility in response to a determination that the at least one identified resource corresponds to the resource generated by the at least one component; and

generating a report based on the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration, wherein the report includes information indicating a difference between the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the operations include:

identifying a set of pipelines that are within a threshold distance to a proposed location for the methanol production facility, the proposed location identified by one of the one or more inputs;

determining a first set of resources accessible from the set of pipelines;

determining a second set of resources utilized in producing methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

estimating an infrastructure cost for each pipeline of the set of pipelines, wherein, for a particular pipeline of the set of pipelines, the infrastructure cost corresponds to a cost to build infrastructure from the proposed location to the particular pipeline to provide the proposed location with access to a resource included in the second set of resources; and

identifying a subset of pipelines from among the set of pipelines, the subset of pipelines including a single pipeline selected from among the set of pipelines for each resource that is included in both the first set of resources and the second set of resources, wherein each pipeline included in the subset of pipelines is associated with a lowest infrastructure cost for each resource that is included in both the first set of resources and the second set of resources, wherein the identified resources correspond to resources provided by the subset of pipelines.

17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein a set of components of the plurality of components generate at least a portion of the second set of resources utilized in producing methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration, and wherein determining the alternative configuration includes:

determining, based on the resources provided by the subset of pipelines, a first set of components of the set of components that may be omitted from the proposed configuration of the methanol production facility; and

determining, based on resources provided by the subset of pipelines, a second set of components of the set of components that may not be omitted from the proposed configuration of the methanol production facility,

wherein the first set of components are removed in the alternative configuration,

wherein the second set of components are retained in the alternative configuration, and

wherein resources generated by the first set of components are to be provided by the subset of pipelines in the alternative configuration.

18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the operations include:

estimating, based on the proposed configuration, a first cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

estimating a second cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the proposed configuration over a period of time;

estimating a cost to purchase the resources from one or more operators of the subset of pipelines;

estimating, based on the alternative configuration, a third cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the alternative configuration, wherein the third cost is lower than the first cost; and

estimating a fourth cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the alternative configuration over the period of time, wherein the fourth cost is higher than the second cost, wherein the fourth cost is determined based at least in part on the cost to purchase the resources from the one or more operators, and wherein the report includes first cost information representative of a difference between the first cost and the third cost and second cost information representative of a difference between the second cost and the fourth cost over the period of time.

19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the operations include estimating a time frame for upgrading the methanol production facility from the alternative configuration to the proposed configuration.

20. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the operations include generating a risk analysis for each configuration of the methanol production facility, wherein the report includes information associated with the risk analysis generated for each configuration.

21. A computer-readable storage device storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving one or more inputs corresponding to a proposed configuration of a methanol production facility, wherein the proposed configuration identifies a plurality of components utilized to produce methanol at the methanol production facility when configured according to the proposed configuration;

determining an alternative configuration of the methanol production facility, wherein the alternative configuration is different from the proposed configuration, and wherein determining the alternative configuration includes;

identifying, based on data stored at a database, resources accessible to a proposed location for the methanol production facility, wherein the identified resources are accessible from at least one source external to the methanol production facility, and wherein the identified resources are utilized during production of methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

determining whether at least one identified resource of the resources accessible to the proposed location corresponds to a resource generated by the at least one component during production of methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration; and

determining, based at least in part on the identified resources accessible to the proposed location, whether to omit at least one component of the plurality of components identified by the proposed configuration; and

omitting the at least one component from the alternative configuration of the methanol production facility in response to a determination that the at least one identified resource corresponds to the resource generated by the at least one component; and

generating a report based on the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration, wherein the report includes information indicating a difference between the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration.

22. The computer-readable storage device of claim 21, wherein the operations include determining an operational reliability of the methanol production facility according to the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration, wherein the report includes information associated with the operational reliability of the methanol production facility according to the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration.

23. The computer-readable storage device of claim 21, wherein the operations include:

identifying a set of pipelines that are within a threshold distance to a proposed location for the methanol production facility, the proposed location identified by one of the one or more inputs;

determining a first set of resources accessible from the set of pipelines;

determining a second set of resources utilized in producing methanol at the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

estimating an infrastructure cost for each pipeline of the set of pipelines, wherein, for a particular pipeline of the set of pipelines, the infrastructure cost corresponds to a cost to build infrastructure from the proposed location to the particular pipeline to provide the proposed location with access to a resource included in the second set of resources; and

identifying a subset of pipelines from among the set of pipelines, the subset of pipelines including a single pipeline selected from among the set of pipelines for each resource that is included in both the first set of resources and the second set of resources, wherein each pipeline included in the subset of pipelines is associated with a lowest infrastructure cost for each resource that is included in both the first set of resources and the second set of resources, wherein the identified resources correspond to resources provided by the subset of pipelines.

24. The computer-readable storage device of claim 23, wherein the operations include:

estimating, based on the proposed configuration, a first cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the proposed configuration;

estimating a second cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the proposed configuration over a period of time;

estimating a cost to purchase the resources from one or more operators of the subset of pipelines;

estimating, based on the alternative configuration, a third cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the alternative configuration, wherein the third cost is lower than the first cost; and

estimating a fourth cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the alternative configuration over the period of time, wherein the fourth cost is higher than the second cost, wherein the fourth cost is determined based at least in part on the cost to purchase the resources from the one or more operators, and wherein the report includes first cost information representative of a difference between the first cost and the third cost and second cost information representative of a difference between the second cost and the fourth cost over the period of time.

25. The computer-readable storage device of claim 24, wherein the operations include:

determining at least one additional alternative configuration of the methanol production facility, wherein the at least one additional alternative configuration is different from the proposed configuration and the alternative configuration;

estimating, based on the at least one additional alternative configuration, at least one additional cost corresponding to an amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the at least one additional alternative configuration, wherein the third cost is lower than at least the first cost; and

estimating at least one additional cost corresponding to operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the at least one additional alternative configuration over a period of time,

wherein the report includes a first set of additional cost information representative of a difference between the first cost and the at least one additional cost corresponding to the amount of capital expenditure required to construct the methanol production facility using the at least one additional alternative configuration and a difference between the second cost and the at least one additional cost corresponding to the operational expenses for operating the methanol production facility configured according to the at least one additional alternative configuration over the period of time.

26. The computer-readable storage device of claim 21, wherein the operations include:

determining a first amount of carbon dioxide emissions based on the proposed configuration for the methanol production facility; and

determining a second amount of carbon dioxide emissions based on the alternative configuration for the methanol production facility, wherein the second amount of carbon dioxide emissions is lower than the first amount of carbon dioxide emissions, and wherein the report includes information representative of the first amount of carbon dioxide emissions and the second amount of carbon dioxide emissions.

27. The computer-readable storage device of claim 26, wherein the operations include:

determining a first amount of carbon credits based on the first amount of carbon dioxide emissions;

determining a second amount of carbon credits based on the second amount of carbon dioxide emissions;

determining a difference between the first amount of carbon credits and the second amount of carbon credits; and

offsetting a operational expense (OpEx) associated with the alternative configuration based on the difference between the first amount of carbon credits and the second amount of carbon credits, wherein the report includes information indicating the first amount of carbon credits, the second amount of carbon credits, and the offset to the OpEx associated with the alternative configuration.