Substance Testing Systems and Methods with Test Subject Identification Using Electronic Facial Recognition Techniques

• US 20160086021A1
• Filed: 09/23/2015
• Published: 03/24/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 09/24/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: 1A Smart Start, Inc.
• Original Assignee: 1A Smart Start, Inc.
• Inventors: Grohman, Wojciech, Bellehumeur, Mark, Caskey, Thomas Scott
• Application Number:
  US14/862,645
• Publication Number:
  US 20160086021A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B60K 28/06 responsive to incapacity of driver
• CPC Class Codes: B60K 28/063 preventing starting of vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 33/4972 Determining alcohol content for vehicle safety devices B60K28/06
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/50 of still image data
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 10/98 Detection or correction of errors, e.g. by rescanning the pattern or by human intervention; Evaluation of the quality of the acquired patterns
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 40/16 Human faces, e.g. facial parts, sketches or expressions
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 40/172 Classification, e.g. identification

Abstract

A method for identifying a test subject being tested for consumption of a selected substance includes storing in a database of a facial recognition processing system a gallery of facial images of a set of individuals. The facial recognition processing system receives a facial image of a test subject being tested for consumption of the selected substance and compares the received facial image with at least some of the facial images in the stored gallery by executing a facial recognition algorithm. In response to a match between a facial image in the stored gallery and the received facial image having a predetermined level of match certainty; the facial recognition processing system identifies the test subject. In response to a failure to obtain a match between a facial image in the stored gallery and the received facial image having a predetermined level of match certainty, the facial recognition processing system flags the received facial image for subsequent manual analysis.

Claims

1. A method for identifying a test subject being tested for consumption of a selected substance comprising:

storing in a database of a facial recognition processing system a gallery of facial images of a set of individuals;

receiving with the facial recognition processing system a facial image of a test subject being tested for consumption of a selected substance;

comparing the received facial image with at least some of the facial images in the stored gallery using a facial recognition algorithm executed by the facial recognition processing system;

in response to a match between a facial image in the stored gallery and the received facial image having a predetermined level of match certainty, identifying the test subject with the facial recognition processing system; and

in response to a failure to obtain a match between a facial image in the stored gallery and the received facial image having a predetermined level of match certainty, flagging the received facial image with the facial recognition processing system for subsequent manual analysis.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the gallery of facial images comprises a gallery of facial images of a set of individuals being monitored by legal authorities.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined level of match certainty is programmed into the facial recognition processing system to set a level of subsequent manual analysis and a corresponding level of test circumvention protection.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected substance is selected from the group consisting of alcohol, illicit drugs, cannabis, and prescription drugs.

5. A system for identifying a test subject being tested for consumption of a selected substance comprising:

a facial recognition processing system including;

a database for storing a gallery of facial images of a set of individuals; and

a processor operable to;

receive a facial image of a test subject being tested for consumption of a selected substance;

compare the received facial image with at least some of the facial images in the stored gallery by executing a facial recognition algorithm;

in response to a match between a facial image in the stored gallery and the received facial image having a predetermined level of match certainty, identify the test subject; and

in response to a failure to obtain a match between a facial image in the stored gallery and the received facial image having a predetermined level of match certainty, flag the received facial image for subsequent manual analysis.

6. The system of claim 5, further comprising a vehicle interlock system including:

a camera for generating the facial image of the test subject; and

a wireless modem for transmitting the facial image to the facial recognition processing system.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the vehicle interlock system comprises a test apparatus for testing the test subject for the selected substance and the facial recognition processing system is further operable to enable the test apparatus in advance of testing the test subject in response to an identification of the test subject.

8. A method of controlling a vehicle sobriety interlock system comprising:

taking a facial image of a vehicle operator with a camera forming a portion of a vehicle sobriety interlock system;

comparing the facial image of the vehicle operator with a set of facial images stored in a database with a processing system executing a facial recognition algorithm; and

in response to a match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images selectively activating a test device forming a portion of the vehicle sobriety interlock system for testing the vehicle operator for consumption of a selected substance.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the processing system is remote from the vehicle sobriety interlock system and the method further comprises transmitting the image of the vehicle operator from a wireless modem forming a portion of the vehicle interlock system to the processing system.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein comparing the image of the vehicle operator with a set of images stored in a database comprises:

determining if the image of the vehicle operator sufficiently represents a human face; and

in response to a determination that the image of the vehicle operator sufficiently represents a human face, comparing the facial image of the vehicle operator with a set of facial images stored in a database with the processing system executing the facial recognition algorithm.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein comparing the image of the vehicle operator with a set of images stored in a database comprises:

determining if the image of the vehicle operator sufficiently represents a human face;

in response to a determination that the image of the vehicle operator does not sufficiently represent a human face, requiring a retake of a facial image of the vehicle operator; and

in response to the retake of the facial image of sufficiently representing a human face, comparing the facial image of the vehicle operator from the retake with a set of facial images stored in a database with the processing system executing the facial recognition algorithm.

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

in response to a failure to obtain match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images, flagging the image of the vehicle operator with the processing system for subsequent manual review.

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

in response to a failure to obtain match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images, requiring a retake of a facial image of the vehicle operator.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

in response to a match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images, determining if the vehicle operator requires testing for consumption of the selected substance;

in response to a determination that the vehicle operator requires testing for consumption of the selected substance, activating the test device; and

in response to a determination that the vehicle operator does not require testing for consumption of the selected substance, bypassing the testing device to allow vehicle ignition.

15. A system for controlling operation of a vehicle having a vehicle sobriety interlock system comprising:

a camera forming a portion of a vehicle sobriety interlock system for taking a facial image of a vehicle operator;

a database storing a set of facial images; and

a processing system operable to;

execute a facial recognition algorithm to compare the facial image of the vehicle operator with the set of facial images stored in a database; and

in response to a match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images selectively activating a test device forming a portion of the vehicle sobriety interlock system for testing the vehicle operator for consumption of a selected substance.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the processing system is remote from the vehicle sobriety interlock system and the vehicle sobriety interlock system further comprises a wireless modem for transmitting the facial image of the vehicle operator to the processing system.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the testing device comprises a breath testing device for detecting the presence of alcohol in the breath of the vehicle operator.

18. The system of claim 15, wherein the processing system is operable to:

in response to a failure to obtain match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images, flagging the image of the vehicle operator for subsequent manual review.

19. The system of claim 15, wherein the predetermined level of certainty is programmable in the processing system by an administrator to set a level of subsequent manual analysis and a corresponding level of test circumvention protection.

20. The system of claim 15, wherein the processing system is further operable to:

in response to a failure to obtain match of a predetermined level of certainty between the facial image of the vehicle operator and a facial image of the set of images, requiring a retake of a facial image of the vehicle operator with the camera.

21. A method of controlling a vehicle sobriety interlock system comprising:

storing at least one first facial image in a database;

taking a second image with a camera forming a portion of a vehicle sobriety interlock system of an object;

executing a facial detection algorithm with a processor using the at least one facial image and the second image to determine if the object is a human face;

in response to a determination that the object is a human face, enabling the vehicle sobriety interlock system for testing the vehicle operator for consumption of a selected substance; and

in response to a determination that the object is not a human face, maintaining the vehicle sobriety interlock system in a disabled state.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising, in response to a determination that the object is not a human face:

taking a third image with a camera forming a portion of a vehicle sobriety interlock system of the object;

executing a facial detection algorithm with a processor using the at least one facial image and the third image to determine if the object is a human face;

in response to a determination that the object is a human face, enabling the vehicle sobriety interlock system for testing the vehicle operator for consumption of a selected substance; and

in response to a determination that the object is not a human face, maintaining the vehicle sobriety interlock system in a disabled state.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein executing a facial detection algorithm with a processor comprises executing a facial detection algorithm with a processor forming a portion of the vehicle interlock system.

24. The method of claim 21, wherein executing a facial detection algorithm with a processor comprises executing a facial detection algorithm with a processor remote from the vehicle interlock system.

25. A method of testing for the use of a selected substance by an individual comprising:

during a predetermined test time window, collecting an air sample through an intake of a breath testing unit capable of measuring an amount of the selected substance in the air sample;

during collecting of the air sample, taking an image of an area proximate the intake of the breath testing unit with a camera; and

with a processing system;

processing measurement data received from the breath testing unit to determine whether the amount of the selected substance in the air sample exceeds a predetermined threshold;

processing image data received from the camera with an algorithm capable of detecting a human face from the image data received from the camera with a predetermined degree of confidence;

if the amount of the selected substance in the air sample exceeds the predetermined threshold, recording the substance test as failed;

if the amount of the selected substance in the air sample does not exceed the predetermined threshold and a human face is not detected in the image data received from the camera, recording the test as failed.

26. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

with the processing system;

if the amount of the selected substance in the air sample exceeds the predetermined threshold, determining if a maximum number of allowed breath retests have been taken; and

if the maximum number of allowed breath retests have not been taken, re-opening the test time window and allowing a retest for use of the selected substance.

27. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

with the processing system;

if a human face was not detected in the image data received from the camera, determining if a maximum number of allowed facial recognition attempts have been taken; and

if the maximum number of allowed facial recognition attempts have not been taken, re-opening the test time window and allowing a retest for use of the selected substance.

28. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

collecting air sample testing pass/fail results and facial detection pass/fail results with the processing system; and

transmitting the collected air sample testing and facial detection results to a server; and

generating a report including the air sample testing and facial detection results with the server and transmitting the report to a monitoring authority.

29. The method of claim 25, wherein the selected substance is alcohol.

30. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

transmitting the image to a remote server; and

performing facial recognition processing on the image data with the server to confirm an identity of a person providing the air sample.

31. The method of claim 25 further comprising:

performing an additional review of pictures received by a server from the breath testing unit when a facial detection certainty score falls between two predetermined thresholds.

32. A system for testing an individual for consumption of a selected substance comprising:

a breath testing unit for measuring an amount of the selected substance in an air sample received at an air intake;

a camera for taking an image of an area proximate the air intake during the collection of the air sample; and

a least one processor operable to;

process measurement data generated by the breath testing unit to determine whether the amount of the selected substance in the air sample exceeds a predetermined threshold; and

process image data received from the camera with a facial detection algorithm capable of detecting a human face in the received image data with a predetermined degree of confidence;

wherein the individual passes a test for consumption of the selected substance when the at least one processor determines that the amount of the selected substance in the air sample is below the preselected threshold and the at least one processor detects a human face in the image data received from the camera.

33. The system of claim 32, wherein the at least one processor comprises:

a first processor operable to process the measurement data generated by the breath testing unit and determining whether the amount of the selected substance in the air sample exceeds a predetermined threshold; and

a second processor operable to process the image data received from the camera with a facial detection algorithm capable of detecting a human face in the received image data with a predetermined degree of confidence;

wherein the individual passes a test for consumption of the selected substance when the first processor determines that the amount of the selected substance in the air sample is below the preselected threshold and the second processor detects a human face in the image data received from the camera.

34. The system of claim 32, wherein the at least one processor comprises a single processor operable to:

execute a first thread for processing the measurement data generated by the breath testing unit and determine whether the amount of the selected substance in the air sample exceeds a predetermined threshold; and

execute a second thread for processing the image data received from the camera with a facial detection algorithm capable of detecting a human face in the received image data with a predetermined degree of confidence;

35. The system of claim 32, further comprising a subsystem for transmitting air sample test results generated by the first processor and facial detection results generated by the second processor to a remove server.