RECORDING MEDIUM STORING EVALUATION SUPPORT PROGRAM, EVALUATION SUPPORT METHOD, AND EVALUATION SUPPORT APPARATUS

• US 20160093228A1
• Filed: 09/14/2015
• Published: 03/31/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 09/30/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Fujitsu Limited
• Original Assignee: Fujitsu Limited
• Inventors: Mayumi, Hidehiko, Tanaka, Toshio, Kobayashi, Takeaki, Kawasaki, Masahiro
• Application Number:
  US14/853,665
• Publication Number:
  US 20160093228A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/02 of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/06 of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers

Abstract

A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium stores a program for causing a computer to execute a process. The process includes generating screen data for answering questions about opinion information related to a topic which is input from a first student terminal; transmitting the screen data to second student terminals; collecting answers to the questions input from the second student terminals; and calculating correct answer rates of the answers to the questions.

Claims

1. A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing a program for causing a computer to execute a process comprising:

generating screen data for answering questions about opinion information related to a topic which is input from a first student terminal;

transmitting the screen data to second student terminals;

collecting answers to the questions input from the second student terminals; and

calculating correct answer rates of the answers to the questions.

2. The recording medium according to claim 1, the process further comprising:

generating screen data of an evaluation screen to display an evaluation result on a student, who uses the first student terminal, based on the correct answer rates and an evaluation result on students, who use the second student terminals, based on the correct answer rates; and

outputting the screen data.

3. The recording medium according to claim 1, the process further comprising:

generating screen data of a presenter evaluation screen to display an evaluation result on a student who uses the first student terminal; and

transmitting the screen data of the presenter evaluation screen to the first student terminal.

4. The recording medium according to claim 1, the process further comprising:

generating screen data of a listener evaluation screen to display an evaluation result on students who use the second student terminals; and

transmitting the screen data of the listener evaluation screen to the second student terminals.

5. The recording medium according to claim 2,

wherein the answers to the questions include values of plural items, and

wherein, in the calculating, correct answers of the plural items are acquired from the opinion information, the correct answers are compared with respective values of the plural items included in the answers to the questions, and correct answer rates of the answers on a question basis and correct answer rates on an item basis are calculated.

6. The recording medium according to claim 5,

wherein the evaluation result on the student who uses the first student terminal includes a message corresponding to the correct answer rates of the answers on the question basis and the correct answer rates on the item basis.

7. The recording medium according to claim 5,

wherein the evaluation result on the students who use the second student terminals includes names of students whose correct answer rates of the answers to the questions are less than a first threshold value and names of students who provided an incorrect answer for an item whose correct error rate is higher than a second threshold value.

8. The recording medium according to claim 5,

wherein the plural items include an item requesting to select agree or disagree to the topic which is input from the first student terminal and an item requesting to input a keyword which is designated from the first student terminal, and

wherein the evaluation result on the students who use the second student terminals includes names of the students who provided incorrect answer for the item requesting to select agree or disagree to the topic.

9. The recording medium according to claim 1,

wherein the first student terminal is used by a student who is selected as a presenter to provide a presentation of an opinion about the topic, and

wherein the second student terminals are used by students who listen to the presentation of the opinion about the topic.

10. The recording medium according to claim 9, the process further comprising:

acquiring a voice sound file in which the presentation by the presenter is recorded;

analyzing whether a designated keyword is pronounced in the voice sound file; and

including a result of the analyzing in an evaluation result on the student who is selected as the presenter.

11. An evaluation support method executed by a computer, the method comprising:

generating screen data for answering questions about opinion information related to a topic which is input from a first student terminal;

transmitting the screen data to second student terminals;

collecting answers to the questions input from the second student terminals; and

calculating correct answer rates of the answers to the questions.

12. An evaluation support apparatus comprising:

a transmitter configured to generate screen data for answering questions about opinion information related to a topic which is input from a first student terminal, and transmit the screen data to second student terminals; and

a correct answer rate calculator configured to collect answers to the questions input from the second student terminals, and calculate correct answer rates of the answers to the questions.