METHOD OF TESTING A POLYCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND COMPACT CUTTER

• US 20160097702A1
• Filed: 10/02/2015
• Published: 04/07/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 10/06/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: CNPC USA Corporation (China National Petroleum Corporation)
• Original Assignee: CNPC USA Corporation (China National Petroleum Corporation)
• Inventors: ZHAO, Liang, CHENG, Xiaomin
• Granted Patent: US 9,746,403 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 10/56 Button-type inserts E21B10/52 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 3/04 Chucks
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 3/08 by applying steady tensile or compressive forces G01N3/28 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 3/58 Investigating machinability by cutting tools; Investigating the cutting ability of tools

Abstract

The method for determining fracture toughness includes clamping a cutting element in a first orientation, exerting a confining pressure on the cutting element, applying a first load at a first distance from a perimeter of the diamond table of the cutting element, increasing the first load to a first level sufficient to fracture, and recording the first level sufficient to fracture. Then, another load is applied at another distance from a perimeter of the diamond table with another cutting element or the same cutting element in another orientation. The load is increased until fracture again. The steps are repeated at different distances and different orientations to create a profile of the fracture toughness of the cutting element. The method also includes wearing the cutting element and measuring fracture toughness at a worn distance. The profile is a more complete rating of the cutting element under drilling conditions.

Claims

1. A method for determining fracture toughness of a cutting element, comprising the steps of:

clamping a first cutting element into a fixture in a first orientation, said first cutting element being comprised of a first diamond table and a first substrate;

exerting a first confining pressure on said first diamond table by said fixture, said confining pressure being radial to said first diamond table and across a first top surface of said first diamond table;

applying a first load at a first distance from a first perimeter of said first diamond table;

increasing said first load to a first level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table;

recording said first level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table;

clamping a second cutting element into said fixture in a second orientation, said second cutting element being comprised of a second diamond table and a second substrate, said first cutting element and said second cutting element being manufactured under a same set of conditions;

exerting a second confining pressure on said second diamond table by said fixture, said second confining pressure being radial to said second diamond table and across a second top surface of said second diamond table;

applying a second load at a second distance from a second perimeter of said second diamond table;

increasing said second load to a second level sufficient to fracture said second diamond table;

recording said second level sufficient to fracture said second diamond table; and

forming a profile of cutting elements manufactured under said same set of conditions as said first cutting element and said second cutting element, said profile being comprised of data related to distance, load, and level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table and said second diamond table.

2. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

clamping an additional cutting element into said fixture in an additional orientation, said additional cutting element being comprised of an additional diamond table and an additional substrate, said first cutting element, said second cutting element, and said additional cutting element being manufactured under a same set of conditions;

exerting an additional confining pressure on said additional diamond table by said fixture, said additional confining pressure being radial to said additional diamond table and across an additional top surface of said additional diamond table;

applying an additional load at an additional distance from an additional perimeter of said additional diamond table;

increasing said additional load to an additional level sufficient to fracture said additional diamond table; and

recording said additional level sufficient to fracture said additional diamond table,

wherein said step of forming said profile of cutting elements manufactured under said same set of conditions comprises data related to distance, load, and level sufficient to fracture said additional diamond table.

3. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

repeating the steps of clamping an additional cutting element at an additional orientation, exerting an additional confining pressure on said additional diamond table by said fixture, applying an additional load at an additional distance from an additional perimeter of said additional diamond table, increasing said additional load to an additional level sufficient to fracture said additional diamond table, and recording said additional level sufficient to fracture said additional diamond table,

wherein said step of forming said profile of cutting elements manufactured under said same set of conditions comprises data related to distance, load, and level sufficient to fracture additional diamond tables.

4. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 1, wherein said second diamond table has a worn edge at a first worn distance along said second perimeter, said second confining pressure being exerted on said worn edge, said first worn distance being less than said first distance, and

wherein said profile further comprises said first worn distance.

5. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 2, wherein said additional diamond table has an additional worn edge at an additional worn distance along said additional perimeter, said additional confining pressure being exerted on said additional worn edge, and

wherein said profile further comprises said additional worn distances.

6. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 3, wherein at least one additional diamond table has at least one additional worn edge at at least one additional worn distance along at least one additional perimeter, said at least one additional confining pressure being exerted on said at least one additional worn edge, and

wherein said profile further comprises at least one additional worn distance.

7. A method for determining fracture toughness of a cutting element, comprising the steps of:

clamping a first cutting element into a fixture in a first orientation, said first cutting element being comprised of a first diamond table and a first substrate;

exerting a first confining pressure on said first diamond table by said fixture, said confining pressure being radial to said first diamond table and across a first top surface of said first diamond table;

applying a first load at a first distance from a first perimeter of said first diamond table;

increasing said first load to a first level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table;

recording said first level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table;

releasing said first cutting element from said fixture;

re-clamping said first cutting element into said fixture in a second orientation, said first orientation being spaced from said second orientation;

exerting a second confining pressure on said first diamond table by said fixture, said second confining pressure being radial to said first diamond table and across said first top surface of said first diamond table;

applying a second load at a second distance from said first perimeter of said first diamond table;

increasing said second load to a second level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table a second time;

recording said second level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table said second time; and

forming a profile of cutting elements manufactured under said same set of conditions as said first cutting element, said profile being comprised of data related to distance, load, and level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table,

wherein fracture in said first orientation is isolated from fracture in said second orientation.

8. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 7, said first diamond table in said second orientation having a same integrity as said first diamond table in said first orientation before fracture in said first orientation.

9. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 7, further comprising the step of:

rotating said first cutting element at least 90 degrees from said first orientation to said second orientation.

10. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 7, further comprising the steps of:

repeating the steps of releasing said first cutting element;

re-clamping said first cutting element at an additional orientation, exerting an additional confining pressure on said first diamond table by said fixture, applying an additional load at an additional distance from said first perimeter of said first diamond table, increasing said additional load to an additional level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table, and recording said additional level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table at said additional orientation,

wherein said step of forming said profile of cutting elements manufactured under said same set of conditions comprises data related to distance, load, and level sufficient to fracture said first diamond table at additional orientations.

11. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 7, wherein said first diamond table has a worn edge at a first worn distance along said first perimeter at said second orientation, said first confining pressure being exerted on said worn edge, said first worn distance being less than said first distance, and

wherein said profile further comprises said first worn distance.

12. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 10, wherein said first diamond table has an additional worn edge at an additional worn distance along said first perimeter, said additional confining pressure being exerted on said additional worn edge, and

wherein said profile further comprises said additional worn distance.

13. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 12, said first diamond table in said second orientation having a same integrity as said first diamond table in said first orientation before fracture in said first orientation.

14. The method for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 12, further comprising the step of:

rotating said first cutting element at least 90 degrees from said first orientation to said second orientation.

15. A device for determining fracture toughness, comprising:

a fixture holding a cutting element, said cutting element being comprised of a diamond table and a substrate;

a clamp comprised of a spacer, said cutting element being mounted in said clamp adjacent to said spacer in a first orientation, said clamp being mounted on said fixture, said space having a complementary profile to said cutting element so as to fit in said fixture;

means for exerting a confining pressure on said diamond table, said confining pressure being radial to said cutting element and lateral across a top surface of said diamond table; and

a load bearing means at a first distance from a perimeter of said diamond table,

wherein said load bearing means is moveable to a second distance from said perimeter.

16. The device for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 15, said cutting element having a worn edge, wherein distance from perimeter of said diamond table to worn edge less than distance from said perimeter to first distance, said cutting element being in a second orientation.

17. The device for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 15, said cutting element having another worn edge, wherein distance from perimeter to another worn edge less than distance from perimeter to another distance, said cutting element being in another orientation.

18. The device for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 15, said cutting element having a second orientation relative to said means for exerting a confining pressure, said first orientation being spaced from said second orientation, wherein fracture in said first orientation is isolated from fracture in said second orientation, said diamond table in said second orientation having a same integrity as said diamond table in said first orientation before fracture.

19. The device for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 15, further comprising:

means for recording data comprised of distance, orientation, worn distance, load, and level sufficient to fracture said diamond table.

20. The device for determining fracture toughness, according to claim 15, further comprising:

means for forming a profile of said cutting element with said data, said profile corresponding to cutting elements manufactured under same conditions as said cutting element.