SOURCE, TARGET AND MASK OPTIMIZATION BY INCORPORATING CONTOUR BASED ASSESSMENTS AND INTEGRATION OVER PROCESS VARIATIONS

• US 20160109795A1
• Filed: 12/30/2015
• Published: 04/21/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: INOUE, TADANOBU, MELVILLE, DAVID O., ROSENBLUTH, ALAN E., SAKAMOTO, MASAHARU, TIAN, KEHAN
• Granted Patent: US 9,651,856 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 1/36 Masks having proximity correction features; Preparation thereof, e.g. optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 7/70125 Use of illumination settings tailored to particular mask patterns details of setting means G03F7/70091
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 7/70308 Optical correction elements, filters or phase plates for manipulating imaging light, e.g. intensity, wavelength, polarisation, phase or image shift
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 7/70441 Optical proximity correction [OPC]
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 7/705 Modelling or simulating from physical phenomena up to complete wafer processes or whole workflow in wafer productions
• CPC Class Codes: G03F 7/70516 Calibration of components of the microlithographic apparatus, e.g. light sources, addressable masks or detectors
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/392 Floor-planning or layout, e.g. partitioning or placement

Abstract

Methods and systems for determining a source shape, a mask shape and a target shape for a lithography process are disclosed. One such method includes receiving source, mask and target constraints and formulating an optimization problem that is based on the source, mask and target constraints and incorporates contour-based assessments for the target shape that are based on physical design quality of a circuit. Further, the optimization problem is solved by integrating over process condition variations to simultaneously determine the source shape, the mask shape and the target shape. In addition, the determined source shape and mask shape are output

Claims

1. A method for determining a source shape, a mask shape and a target shape for a lithography process comprising:

formulating an optimization problem by forming a constraint function;

solving, by a hardware processor, the optimization problem by integrating over process condition variations to simultaneously determine the source shape, the mask shape and the target shape; and

outputting the determined source shape and mask shape.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the optimization problem incorporates contour-based assessments for the target shape that are based on physical design quality of a circuit; and

the integrating over the process condition variations employs the contour-based assessments under multiple process conditions within a process control space.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising receiving source, mask and target constraints, wherein said target constraints include at least one of tolerance band constraints or process variability band constraints for the target shape.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein said target constraints include tolerance band constraints and wherein said contour-based assessments are based on said tolerance band constraints and are further based on post-lithography quality.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the solving comprises maximizing a functionality modeling function with said source, mask and target constraints.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the functionality modeling function is based on distances between contours of the target shape and borders of tolerance bands.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the maximizing comprises maximizing a per-target contour yield.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the yield is a function of at least one of focus, light dose variation or mask error.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the functionality modeling function is dependent on a process probability that is based on data measured from a physical optical system.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the yield accounts for inter-chip variations.

11. The method of claim 5, wherein the solving comprises varying a location of at least one evaluation point of said target shape independently from a location of at least one other evaluation point of said target shape.

12. A method for determining a source shape, a mask shape and a target shape for a lithography process comprising:

formulating an optimization problem by forming a constraint function;

solving, by a hardware processor, the optimization problem by maximizing a process window with said source, mask and target constraints to simultaneously determine the source shape, the mask shape and the target shape; and

outputting the determined source shape and mask shape.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising receiving source, mask and target constraints, wherein:

the source, mask and target constraints include tolerance band constraints for the target shape; and

the target constraints further include process variability band constraints for the target shape.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein said target constraints are set at each evaluation point of said target shape such that any contour position is within a corresponding tolerance band of said tolerance band constraints.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein the solving comprises varying a location of at least one evaluation point of said target shape independently from a location of at least one other evaluation point of said target shape.

16. A system for determining a source shape, a mask shape and a target shape for a lithography process comprising:

an objective formulation module configured to formulate an optimization problem by forming a constraint function; and

s

a solver, implemented by a hardware processor, configured to solve the optimization problem by minimizing process variability bands with said source, mask and target constraints to simultaneously determine the source shape, the mask shape and the target shape, and configured to output the determined source shape and mask shape.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the optimization problem is dependent on an edge placement error that is based on at least one of a defocus condition, a light dose condition and a mask error condition.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the solver is further configured to vary a location of at least one evaluation point of said target shape independently from a location of at least one other evaluation point of said target shape.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein said solver is a non-linear solver.

20. The system of claim 16, wherein said solver is further configured to output said determined target shape.