METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING IMPLANT POSITIONS OF TWO MEDICAL IMPLANT COMPONENTS FORMING A JOINT

• US 20160262837A1
• Filed: 12/17/2013
• Published: 09/15/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 12/17/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Smith & Nephew Incorporated (Smith & Nephew PLC), Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics Ag (Smith & Nephew PLC), Smith & Nephew Pte. Limited (Smith & Nephew PLC)
• Original Assignee: Brainlab AG
• Inventors: Gtte, Hubert
• Granted Patent: US 10,327,848 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/104 Modelling the effect of the tool, e.g. the effect of an implanted prosthesis or for predicting the effect of ablation or burring
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/107 Visualisation of planned trajectories or target regions
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/108 Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/10 Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/38 for elbows or knees
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/4657 Measuring instruments used for implanting artificial joints for surgical instruments A61B90/06
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/30616 Sets comprising a plurality of prosthetic parts of different sizes or orientations
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/4633 for selection of endoprosthetic joints or for pre-operative planning

Abstract

A data processing method, performed by a computer, for determining implant positions of two implant components relative to two bones, wherein each of the implant components is to be attached to one of the bones such that the implant components form a joint between the bones, and wherein an implant position is a relative position between the implant component and the corresponding bone, said method comprising the steps of: a) acquiring a set of target poses, wherein a target pose represents a relative position to be achieved between the two bones; b) calculating a set of virtual poses for a pair of virtual test implant positions, wherein the set of virtual poses comprises one virtual pose for each of the target poses and wherein a virtual pose represents a relative position between the two bones if the virtual test implant positions were applied as the implant positions; c) calculating a pose deviation value for each of the target poses, wherein a pose deviation value represents the difference between a target pose and the corresponding virtual pose; d) calculating an overall pose deviation value from all the individual pose deviation values; e) repeating steps b) to d) for different pairs of virtual test implant positions until the overall pose deviation value fulfils a minimisation criterion; and f) using the pair of virtual test implant positions for which the minimisation criterion is fulfilled as the implant positions.

Claims

1-15. -15. (canceled)

16. A data processing system, comprising a computer having a processor configured to execute a computer-implemented method for determining implant positions of two implant components relative to two bones, wherein each of the implant components is to be attached to one of the bones such that the implant components form a joint between the bones, and wherein an implant position is a relative position between the implant component and the corresponding bone, said method comprising the steps of:

a) acquiring, by the processor, a set of target poses, wherein a target pose represents a relative position to be achieved between the two bones;

b) calculating, by the processor, a set of virtual poses for a pair of virtual test implant positions, wherein the set of virtual poses comprises one virtual pose for each of the target poses and wherein a virtual pose represents a relative position between the two bones if the virtual test implant positions were applied as the implant positions;

c) calculating, by the processor, a pose deviation value for each of the target poses, wherein a pose deviation value represents the difference between a target pose and the corresponding virtual pose;

d) calculating, by the processor, an overall pose deviation value from all the individual pose deviation values;

e) repeating steps b) to d) for different pairs of virtual test implant positions until the overall pose deviation value fulfils a minimisation criterion; and

f) using, by the processor, the pair of virtual test implant positions for which the minimisation criterion is fulfilled as the implant positions.

17. A data processing method, performed by a computer, for determining implant positions of two implant components relative to two bones, wherein each of the implant components is to be attached to one of the bones such that the implant components form a joint between the bones, and wherein an implant position is a relative position between the implant component and the corresponding bone, said method comprising executing, by a processor of the computer, the steps of:

a) acquiring a set of target poses, wherein a target pose represents a relative position to be achieved between the two bones;

b) calculating a set of virtual poses for a pair of virtual test implant positions, wherein the set of virtual poses comprises one virtual pose for each of the target poses and wherein a virtual pose represents a relative position between the two bones if the virtual test implant positions were applied as the implant positions;

c) calculating a pose deviation value for each of the target poses, wherein a pose deviation value represents the difference between a target pose and the corresponding virtual pose;

d) calculating an overall pose deviation value from all the individual pose deviation values;

e) repeating steps b) to d) for different pairs of virtual test implant positions until the overall pose deviation value fulfils a minimisation criterion; and

f) using the pair of virtual test implant positions for which the minimisation criterion is fulfilled as the implant positions.

18. The method according to claim 17, wherein calculating a virtual pose involves determining a relative position between the implant components in which they are in stable contact.

19. The method according to claim 18, wherein a virtual pose is defined by six parameters corresponding to six degrees of freedom, and calculating a virtual pose involves fixing four of the six parameters and varying the remaining two parameters until stable contact is achieved.

20. The method according to claim 17, wherein a pose is represented by the relative position of a co-ordinate system of one of the bones in a co-ordinate system of the other bone.

21. The method according to claim 17, wherein a pose is represented by the relative position of a co-ordinate system of one of the implant components in a co-ordinate system of the other implant component.

22. The method according to claim 21, wherein a first pose represented by the relative position of the co-ordinate systems which are not co-ordinate systems of the implant components is transformed into the pose represented by the relative position of the co-ordinate systems of the implant components.

23. The method according to claim 20, wherein the orientations of the co-ordinate systems match the proximodistal, anterioposterior and mediolateral directions.

24. The method according to claim 17, wherein the overall pose deviation value is calculated from weighted pose deviation values.

25. The method according to claim 17, wherein boundaries are defined for the virtual test implant positions.

26. The method according to claim 17, wherein a virtual test implant position is defined by six parameters corresponding to six degrees of freedom, thus resulting in twelve degrees of freedom for the two implant components, wherein the virtual test implant positions are varied in less than twelve degrees of freedom, and the parameters for the remaining degrees of freedom are set to fixed values.

27. The method according to claim 17, wherein the pose deviation values are calculated from the deviation between the virtual poses and the target poses with respect to a varus-valgus rotation and a proximodistal shift only.

28. The method according to claim 17, wherein a pose deviation value is calculated from the distances between each of two points on one of the bones and corresponding points on the other bone.

29. The method according to claim 17, wherein calculating the pose deviation values involves weighting the parameters corresponding to translational shifts and/or the parameters corresponding to rotational shifts.

30. A non-transitory computer-readable program storage medium storing a program which, when executed on a processor of a computer, causes the processor to perform the steps of:

a) acquiring a set of target poses, wherein a target pose represents a relative position to be achieved between the two bones;

b) calculating a set of virtual poses for a pair of virtual test implant positions, wherein the set of virtual poses comprises one virtual pose for each of the target poses and wherein a virtual pose represents a relative position between the two bones if the virtual test implant positions were applied as the implant positions;

c) calculating a pose deviation value for each of the target poses, wherein a pose deviation value represents the difference between a target pose and the corresponding virtual pose;

d) calculating an overall pose deviation value from all the individual pose deviation values;

e) repeating steps b) to d) for different pairs of virtual test implant positions until the overall pose deviation value fulfils a minimisation criterion; and

f) using the pair of virtual test implant positions for which the minimisation criterion is fulfilled as the implant positions.

31. A computer comprising the non-transitory computer-readable program storage medium of claim 30.

32. A device for determining implant positions of two implant components relative to two bones, comprising a computer according to claim 31.