Look Alike Advertising Modelling

• US 20160275547A1
• Filed: 02/10/2016
• Published: 09/22/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 02/10/2015
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Yieldmo, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Yieldmo, Inc.
• Inventors: Jawde, Farid, Coleman, John Todd
• Application Number:
  US15/040,850
• Publication Number:
  US 20160275547A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0482 Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/04842 Selection of displayed objects or displayed text elements G06F3/0482 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0244 Optimization
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0267 Wireless devices

Abstract

An advertising optimization system and method is provided for use with advertisements on mobile devices. The advertisement format may be tested and modified for various optimization requirements and then reused for the same or different advertisements in locations which share some or all of the same attributes.

Claims

1. A system for optimizing a digital advertisement format for display on a mobile device and reusing the optimized format, the system comprising:

a processor based device which identifies a plurality of advertisement placement locations and stores said plurality of placement locations,

said processor based device configured to test an effectiveness of an advertisement format within at least one of said locations and determine an effectiveness of said format based on at least one predetermined objective;

a memory for storing a result of said effectiveness test for said at least one of said locations; and

,

a search module configured to match said stored result with another of said stored locations.

2. The system according to claim 1 further including said processor based device configured to serve an advertisement using said advertisement format at said another of said stored locations.

3. The system according to claim 2 wherein said advertisement is an advertisement that was tested in said effectiveness test.

4. The system according to claim 2 wherein said advertisement is an advertisement that was not tested in said effectiveness test.

5. The system according to claim 1 wherein said at least one objective is an objective selected from the list objectives consisting of click click-through rate (CTR), conversion rate, and an amount of time the advertisement is displayed.

6. The system according to claim 1 wherein said plurality of locations include one or more locations selected from the list of locations consisting of a page, a section of a page, a domain, and a device type.

7. The system according to claim 1 wherein said processor based device is an advertisement server.

8. The system according to claim 1 wherein said result includes at least one result from the selection of results consisting of a page type, a location within a page, a page content, a content format, and a device type.

9. The system according to claim 1 further comprising said processor based device configured to test an effectiveness of a plurality of advertisement formats within said at least one of said locations and determine which of said formats is the most effective based on said at least one predetermined objective.

10. The system according to claim 9 wherein said result includes said most effective format.

11. The system according to claim 9 wherein said memory is configured to store at least two of said formats and wherein said search module is configured to only match said most effective format with another of said stored locations.

12. A method for optimizing an advertisement format for an advertisement placement location and reusing the optimized format in an another advertisement placement location, the method comprising:

an advertisement server associating a plurality of attributes with an advertisement placement location identifier;

said advertisement server associating another plurality of attributes with another advertisement placement location identifier;

wherein said plurality of attributes and said another plurality of attributes include at least one attribute that is only associated with one of said location identifier and said another location identifier;

said advertisement server storing said identifiers in memory;

said advertisement server performing, for at least one advertisement format, optimization testing for an advertisement placement location associated with said advertisement placement location identifier to determine an optimized advertisement format;

said advertisement server storing a result of said optimization testing; and

said advertisement server locating yet another location identifier having a sufficient number of same attributes as said advertisement placement location identifier and employing said optimized advertisement format at a location associated with said yet another location identifier.

13. The method according to claim 12 wherein said optimization testing includes at least one objective selected from the group of objectives consisting of click-through rate (CTR), conversion rate, and an amount of time the advertisement is displayed.

14. The method according to claim 12 wherein each of said advertisement placement location and said yet another advertisement placement location is respectively selected from the list of locations consisting of a page, a section of a page, a domain, and a device type.

15. The method according to claim 12 wherein said result includes at least one result from the selection of results consisting of a page type, a location within a page, a page content, a content format, and a device type.

16. The method according to claim 15 wherein said result further includes said at least one advertisement format.

17. The method according to claim 13 further including said advertisement server performing, for a plurality of advertisement formats, optimization testing for said advertisement placement location and determining which of said plurality of formats is most effective based on said at least one objective.

18. The method according to claim 17 wherein said result includes said most effective format.

19. The method according to claim 17 further including said memory storing at least two of said advertisement formats.

20. The method according to claim 12 wherein said sufficient number of same attributes is determined by comparing the number of same attributes to a threshold.

21. A method for optimizing a digital advertising format for a user of a mobile device and reusing the optimized format for additional advertisements on said device, the method comprising:

an ad server serving an advertisement for display on said mobile device;

wherein said advertisement includes an advertising format;

said ad server creating an aesthetic preference profile for said device by tracking a user'"'"'s interaction with said advertisement;

said ad server receiving a plurality of profile criteria from said mobile device and storing at least some of said criteria in said aesthetic preference profile;

said ad server using said aesthetic preference profile to determine an effective advertising format for use with an additional advertisement; and

said ad server serving said additional advertisement for display on said mobile device wherein said additional advertisement includes said effective advertising format.

22. The method according to claim 21 further comprising said ad server creating a plurality of aesthetic preference profiles;

and wherein said effective advertisement format is derived from at least one of said plurality of aesthetic preference profiles.

23. The method according to claim 21 wherein said plurality of aesthetic preference profiles are differentiated by at least one of viewing location, content, time, geography, and advertisement type.

24. The method according to claim 21 further comprising said ad server serving another advertisement for display on said mobile device;

wherein said another advertisement includes another advertising format;

said ad server receiving additional profile criteria from said mobile device and refining said aesthetic profile based on said additional profile criteria.

25. The method according to claim 21 wherein said ad server tracks said user using at least one attribution technique.

26. The method according to claim 25 further comprising said ad server determining that said user is operating a processor based device other than said mobile device, said ad server serving said additional advertisement for display on said processor based device other than said mobile device wherein said additional advertisement includes said effective advertising format.