System and Method for Determination of Machine State Based on Video and Audio Analytics

• US 20160292846A1
• Filed: 04/01/2015
• Published: 10/06/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 04/01/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Inventors: Sprock, Christopher, Baumann, Ryan, Talmaki, Sanat, Halepatali, Praveen
• Granted Patent: US 10,324,433 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/00 Programme-control systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 2207/30164 Workpiece; Machine component
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 7/001 using an image reference approach

Abstract

Systems and methods for analyzing and optimizing worksite operations based on video and or audio data are disclosed. One method includes receiving one or more models relating to a worksite, receiving first sensor data associated with the machine at the worksite, receiving second sensor data associated with an operation of the machine at the worksite, wherein the second sensor data is sourced from a sensor that is different from a sensor sourcing the first sensor data, determining, by the one or more processors, a machine state based at least on the first data and the second data, comparing the determined machine state to a modeled machine state represented by the received one or more models to classify site operations and/or detect an irregularity in site operations or an inefficiency in site operations, and generating a response based at least on the detected irregularity or inefficiency.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving, by one or more processors, one or more models relating to a worksite or a machine at the worksite;

receiving, by the one or more processors, first sensor data associated with the machine at the worksite, the first sensor data comprising one or more of image data and audio data;

receiving, by the one or more processors, second sensor data associated with an operation of the machine at the worksite, wherein the second sensor data is sourced from a sensor that is different from a sensor sourcing the first sensor data;

determining, by the one or more processors, a machine state based at least on the first sensor data and the second sensor data;

comparing the determined machine state to a modeled machine state represented by the received one or more models to detect an irregularity in site operations or an inefficiency in site operations; and

generating a response based at least on the detected irregularity or inefficiency.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting the response to one or more of an operator and a central station.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more models comprises a worksite model and further comprising updating the worksite model based at least on the generated response.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first sensor data is received via an onsite sensor and the second sensor data is received via an offsite sensor.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first sensor data is received via an offsite sensor and the second sensor data is received via an onsite sensor.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the determined machine state and the modeled machine state comprise a characteristic of a material load.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining the machine state comprises generating a signature representing the machine state.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the response comprises one or more of an audible indicator and a visual indicator.

9. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory bearing instructions that, upon execution by the processor, cause the system at least to;

receive one or more models relating to a worksite or a machine at the worksite;

receive first sensor data associated with the machine at the worksite, the first sensor data comprising one or more of image data and audio data;

receive second sensor data associated with an operation of the machine at the worksite, wherein the second sensor data is sourced from a sensor that is different from a sensor sourcing the first sensor data;

determine a machine state based at least on the first sensor data and the second sensor data; and

compare the determined machine state to a modeled machine state represented by the received one or more models to classify one or more site operations.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the one or more models comprises a worksite model and further comprising instructions that, upon execution by the processor, cause the system at least to update the worksite model based at least on the classified one or more site operations.

11. The system of claim 9, wherein the first sensor data is received via an onsite sensor and the second sensor data is received via an offsite sensor.

12. The system of claim 9, wherein the first sensor data is received via an offsite sensor and the second sensor data is received via an onsite sensor.

13. The system of claim 9, wherein one or more of the determined machine state and the modeled machine state comprise a characteristic of a material load.

14. The system of claim 9, wherein the determining the machine state comprises generating a signature representing the machine state.

15. A computer readable storage medium bearing instructions that, upon execution by one or more processors, effectuate operations comprising:

receiving, by the one or more processors, first sensor data associated with a machine at a worksite, the first sensor data comprising one or more of image data and audio data;

receiving, by the one or more processors, second sensor data associated with an operation of the machine at the worksite, wherein the second sensor data is sourced from a sensor that is different from a sensor sourcing the first sensor data;

determining, by the one or more processors, a state signature based at least on the first sensor data and the second sensor data;

comparing the state signature to a stored state signature to determine a machine state;

detecting an irregularity in site operations or an inefficiency in site operations based on the determined machine state; and

generating a response based at least on the detected irregularity or inefficiency.

16. The computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the first sensor data is received via an onsite sensor and the second sensor data is received via an offsite sensor.

17. The computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the first sensor data is received via an offsite sensor and the second sensor data is received via an onsite sensor.

18. The computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein one or more of the determined machine state and the modeled machine state comprise a characteristic of a material load.

19. The computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the detecting an irregularity in site operations or an inefficiency in site operations comprises comparing the determined machine state to one or more models relating to the worksite.

20. The computer readable storage medium of claim 15, further comprising transmitting the response to one or more of an operator and a central station.