METHOD FOR MONITORING AND CONTROLLING VEHICLE ROUTES IN ORDER TO OPTIMISE THE USE OF THE LOAD CAPACITY THEREOF

• US 20160342946A1
• Filed: 12/30/2014
• Published: 11/24/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 01/27/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Martin Herraiz Herraiz
• Original Assignee: Martin Herraiz Herraiz
• Inventors: Herraiz Herraiz, Martin
• Application Number:
  US14/910,261
• Publication Number:
  US 20160342946A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08355 Routing methods
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/202 Dispatching vehicles on the basis of a location, e.g. taxi dispatching

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for optimising the use of the unoccupied load transport capacity of vehicles, assigning the most suitable transport requests to each vehicle in real time. A device in the vehicle communicates its route modifications to a control unit, and the unit alters the points which make up the route thereof, in real time, so that it can collect and deliver loads at these points. It also takes into account the use made of the vehicle for each transported load.

Claims

1. Procedure for an entity to monitor and control a course of a vehicle, that has a device in communication with the entity, an initial route towards a vehicle destination point and an initial vacant load transport capacity, to utilize said vacant capacity by at least one assignment to said course of a load transport request between a request origin point and a request destination point, characterized in that

a) first, the vehicle'"'"'s device indicates to the entity the current position of the vehicle and the value of a parameter of deviation allowed from the initial route of the vehicle;

b) then, the entity establishes a reach zone of the vehicle, as a function of its position and the value of a parameter of pick-up deviation proportional to the deviation allowed from the route of the vehicle;

c) later on, when a request origin point falls within the reach zone of the vehicle, the entity declares said request as candidate to be transported in the vehicle if a required load capacity of the request is less than a current vacant load capacity of the vehicle;

d) then, the entity declares said candidate request as suitable to be transported in the vehicle if the distance from the request destination point to a planned route of the vehicle is less than the value of a parameter of delivery deviation proportional to the deviation allowed from the route of the vehicle;

e) then, the entity assigns to the course of the vehicle the transport of the suitable request, adding to the planned route of the vehicle said request origin point as a pick-up point of its load and said request destination point as a delivery point of said load;

f) afterwards, when the device sends to the entity a message of notification of the arrival of the vehicle to some of the planned route points, said point is deleted from the route;

g) then, the entity recalculates the load capacity that remains vacant in the vehicle, taking into account the initial capacity, the notifications of arrival to pick-up and delivery points of its route, and the required load capacity of each transport request assigned; and

h) finally, steps b to g are reiterated until the vehicle reaches its destination point, assigning the entity along the course a plurality of transport requests, thanks to which optimizes the use of its vacant transport capacity.

2. Procedure according to claim 1, characterized in that

a) first, the transport request includes the value of a parameter of tolerance of delivery that defines a delivery zone around its destination point;

b) then, the entity looks for an alternative delivery point to said destination point, such that the distance from said alternative delivery point to the planned route of the vehicle is less than the value of the parameter of delivery deviation, and said alternative delivery point falls within said delivery zone;

c) then, the entity also declares as suitable to be transported in the vehicle every candidate request with tolerance of delivery for which at least one alternative delivery point has been found; and

d) finally, the point included on the planned route of the vehicle as delivery point of the load of said suitable request with tolerance of delivery, is one of said alternative delivery points.

3. Procedure according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that

a) first, the entity calculates the values of the parameters of pick-up deviation and delivery deviation as a function of the value of the parameter of deviation allowed from the route, that is indicated as a ratio between the increment of the length of the route of the vehicle allowed for requests transportation, and the length of the initial route of the vehicle;

and

b) then, the entity doesn'"'"'t declare a request as suitable if it calculates that, as a result of adding to the route its pick-up and delivery points, said length increment would be exceeded.

4. Procedure according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that

a) first, the entity calculates the values of the parameters of pick-up deviation and delivery deviation as a function of a speed of displacement of the vehicle, the length of its planned route and the value of the parameter of deviation allowed from the route, that is indicated as a limit time of arrival of the vehicle to its destination point;

and

b) then, the entity doesn'"'"'t declare a request as suitable if it calculates that, as a result of adding to the route its pick-up and delivery points, the vehicle would reach its destination after said time.

5. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the entity adjusts the value of the parameter of pick-up deviation as a function of a degree of occupancy of the initial vacant load transport capacity that the vehicle has.

6. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the entity adjusts the value of the parameter of delivery deviation as a function of a degree of occupancy of the initial vacant load transport capacity that the vehicle has.

7. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the entity adjusts the value of the parameter of delivery deviation as a function of the distance between request'"'"'s origin and destination points.

8. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the entity adjusts the value of the parameter of delivery deviation as a function of the required load capacity of the request.

9. Procedure according to any of the claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the vacant load transport capacity of the vehicle and the required load capacity of the request are indicated as a number of seats for passenger transportation.

10. Procedure according to any of the claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the vacant load transport capacity of the vehicle and the required load capacity of the request are indicated as a weight for goods transportation.

11. Procedure according to any of the claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the vacant load transport capacity of the vehicle and the required load capacity of the request are indicated as a volume for goods transportation.

12. Procedure according to any of the claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the vacant load transport capacity of the vehicle and the required load capacity of the request are indicated as any combination of the number of seats for passenger transportation, the weight and the volume for goods transportation.

13. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that

a) first, the device periodically calculates an average of the recent displacement of the vehicle during the time indicated by the value of a parameter of averaging time;

b) then, the device compares the last displacement average calculated, with the last displacement average sent to the entity and, when the difference between both averages is more than the value of a parameter of change of trajectory notice threshold, sends to the entity a message of change of vehicle'"'"'s trajectory notice, communicating the last displacement average calculated; and

c) finally, during the time elapsed between two messages from the device containing information about its displacement, the entity estimates a calculated current position of the vehicle as a function of said information and the time elapsed since the last message.

14. Procedure according to claim 13, characterized in that the entity indicates to the device the value of the parameter of averaging time of the recent displacement of the vehicle.

15. Procedure according to claim 13 or 14, characterized in that the entity indicates to the device the value of the parameter of change of trajectory notice threshold.

16. Procedure according to any of the claims 13 to 15, characterized in that the device performs the calculation of the average of the recent displacement of the vehicle by storing the last positions of the vehicle in a circular register whose storage capacity of positions is proportional to the value of the parameter of averaging time.

17. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that

a) first, the entity predicts a future position where the vehicle will be when a determined time of anticipation elapses, as a function of the last information received about its displacement, and the time elapsed since said communication, plus said time of anticipation;

and

b) then, the entity establishes the reach zone of the vehicle, as a function of said future position.

18. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that when the entity declares that the same transport request is suitable to be carried by more than one of the vehicles whose courses monitors and controls, the entity assigns said request to one of said vehicles as a function of two factors:

the degree of occupancy of the vacant load transport capacity that has each of said vehicles, and the route length increment involved for each of them to transport said request.

19. Procedure according to any of the claims 4 to 18, characterized in that the entity uses the speed indicated by the average of the displacement of a vehicle, which has been communicated by its device in certain point of its course, to predict the speed that will have other vehicles whose planned routes pass through that point.

20. Procedure according to any of the claims 4 to 19, characterized in that the entity

a) first, compares the speed of the average of the displacement communicated by the device of a vehicle in certain point, with the speed that would be usual at that point in the current date and time according to a statistical distribution, to detect the existence of a traffic congestion at that point;

b) in case there is a congestion point, it adds at least one additional point to the planned routes of the vehicles that pass through said point, so that they detour and avoid passing through that point; and

c) finally, it doesn'"'"'t assign to a vehicle a transport request requiring it to pass through said congestion point.

21. Procedure according to any of the claims 4 to 20, characterized in that the entity

a) first, compares a number of vehicles, whose courses monitors through the change of trajectory notices of their devices, passing in certain period by in certain point, with the number of vehicles monitored that would be usual at that point in the current date and time according to a statistical distribution, to detect the existence of a traffic interruption at that point;

b) in case there is a point with traffic interruption, it adds at least one additional point to the planned routes of the vehicles that pass through said point, so that they detour and avoid passing through that point; and

c) finally, it doesn'"'"'t assign to a vehicle a transport request requiring it to pass through said point with traffic interruption.

22. Procedure according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that

a) first, the entity takes into account the pick-up and delivery points of requests along the route of the vehicle to calculate the length of each one of the legs went through by the vehicle, in each one of them it carries the same group of requests;

b) then, it weights said length by dividing it by de addition of the load capacities required for the requests of said group; and

c) finally, it calculates the value of a parameter that accounts for the benefit obtained from the vehicle for each request transported during the course, through the product of its respective load capacity required, times the addition of the weighted lengths of each of the legs in which it has been transported.