LOAD IMPACT PREDICTION PROCESSOR

• US 20160364820A1
• Filed: 06/15/2015
• Published: 12/15/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 06/15/2015
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: PowerSchool Group LLC
• Original Assignee: NCS Pearson Incorporated (Pearson plc)
• Inventors: Dibble, Thomas R.
• Application Number:
  US14/740,068
• Publication Number:
  US 20160364820A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/2053 Education institution selection, admissions, or financial aid

Abstract

Systems and methods for scheduling students in class sections via a Student Information System using student load impact prediction are disclosed herein. Determining load impact includes identifying singletons, including natural and forced singletons, and determining students affected by these identified singletons. A student having one or several singletons can be selected and his highest priority natural singleton can be selected. The scheduling solution can be generated including that highest ranked singleton. After the scheduling solution has been generated, the student can be evaluated to determine if the scheduling solution created other singletons. These other singletons can be addressed in similar fashion by updating the scheduling solution.

Claims

1. A method of scheduling a student comprising:

receiving a plurality of enrollment requests from a plurality of students with an SIS, wherein an enrollment request contains data identifying a student and a course;

identifying courses in the data of the plurality of enrollment requests with the SIS;

identifying a natural singleton in the one of the plurality of enrollment requests for one of the plurality students, wherein a natural singleton comprises an enrollment request for a course having a single section with the SIS; and

generating a scheduling report identifying the natural singleton and the associated course with the SIS.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a restriction for the course corresponding to forced singleton.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the restriction comprises a reservation.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying a first forced singleton, wherein a forced singleton comprises a request for a course having more than one section, but for which attendance is only possible in one section due to the natural singleton or due to another forced singleton.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the scheduling report identifies the first forced singleton and the associated course.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising generating a restriction for the course corresponding to the first forced singleton.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the restriction comprises a reservation.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising pruning sections of requested courses that conflict with one of the natural singleton and the first forced singleton.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising, determining if the natural singleton and the first forced singleton create a second forced singleton.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising, determining if a class cannot be enrolled due to the student'"'"'s enrollment in at least one of:

the natural singleton, the first forced singleton, and the second forced singleton.

11. A system for scheduling a student comprising:

memory comprising;

course information identifying at least one available course and at least one section of that at least one available course; and

an SIS configured to;

receive a plurality of enrollment requests from a plurality of students, wherein an enrollment request contains data identifying a student and a course;

identify courses in the data of the plurality of enrollment requests;

identify a natural singleton in the one of the plurality of enrollment requests for one of the plurality students, wherein a natural singleton comprises an enrollment request for a course having a single section; and

generate a scheduling report identifying the natural singleton and the associated course.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the SIS is further configured to generate a restriction for the course corresponding to forced singleton.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the restriction comprises a reservation.

14. The system of claim 11, wherein the SIS is further configured to identify a first forced singleton, wherein a forced singleton comprises a request for a course having more than one section, but for which attendance is only possible in one section due to the natural singleton or due to another forced singleton.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the scheduling report identifies the first forced singleton and the associated course.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the SIS is further configured to generate a restriction for the course corresponding to the first forced singleton.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the restriction comprises a reservation.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the SIS is further configured to prune sections of requested courses that conflict with one of the natural singleton and the first forced singleton.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the SIS is further configured to determine if the natural singleton and the first forced singleton create a second forced singleton.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the SIS is further configured to determine if a class cannot be enrolled due to the student'"'"'s enrollment in at least one of:

the natural singleton, the first forced singleton, and the second forced singleton.