SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND ELIMINATING UNAUTHORIZED DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

• US 20170011409A1
• Filed: 09/28/2015
• Published: 01/12/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 11/06/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: DNA Response, Inc. (Bluewater Media LLC)
• Original Assignee: DNA Response, Inc. (Bluewater Media LLC)
• Inventors: Eager, Thomas D., Nelson, Joshua Ryan, Muljaonkar, Ranjit, Maliska, Thomas P. Jr.
• Application Number:
  US14/868,316
• Publication Number:
  US 20170011409A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0185 Product, service or business identity fraud
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0201 Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data

Abstract

Online communications are susceptible to high levels of fraud or other unauthorized communications. Online sources of information about goods, including business-to-business resources, marketplace web sites, custom retail web sites, and the like may knowingly or unknowingly transmit communications representing counterfeit goods as genuine, communications regarding overstock goods at low prices without production and commission costs, and solicit customers anonymously. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, electronic information sources are monitored using data metrics to track electronic retailer activities, monitor distribution volumes by source, and monitor pricing. Analysis of such communications may be used to detect potentially fraudulent activity, and, based on manufacturer policy and threshold settings, may automatically report, notify, or take action against such illicit communications.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for detecting and eliminating unauthorized digital communications, the method comprising:

building source profiles associated with a plurality of product sources, wherein building source profiles associated with a plurality of product sources comprises;

generating a set of search queries based on a set of product definitions;

executing the set of search queries to obtain a set of gathered resources;

creating a set of source profiles based on the set of gathered resources; and

updating the set of source profiles with information retrieved from the set of gathered resources using a set of parsing rules;

determining whether one or more aspects of a source profile of the set of source profiles exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds by calculating a presentation assessment score based on a comparison of brand information presented in the set of gathered resources used to create the source profile to brand information presentation guidelines identified in a product definition used to create the source profile; and

in response to determining that one or more aspects of the source profile exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds;

creating a remediation workflow having one or more remediation steps; and

executing the remediation steps of the remediation workflow.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the brand information presentation guidelines include a specification of one or more of an approved image, a tagline, a trademark, a spelling check, a font, and a color.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

for the source profile of the set of source profiles;

calculating one or more of a category, a pricing assessment score, a magnitude assessment score, and a combined threat assessment score; and

wherein determining that one or more aspects of the source profile exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds includes determining that one or more of the category, the pricing assessment score, the magnitude assessment score, the presentation assessment score, or the channel protection score exceeds one or more predetermined remediation thresholds.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein calculating the pricing assessment score comprises comparing pricing information associated with the source profile to an expected pricing value.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein calculating the magnitude assessment score comprises comparing information indicative of sales volume associated with the source profile to a threshold volume value.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein calculating the presentation assessment score comprises causing brand information presented in gathered resources associated with the source profile to be presented to a manufacturer for manual review.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein calculating the category comprises assigning the source profile to a whitelist category, a greylist category, a blacklist category, or an unknown category based on information indicative of a product source associated with the source profile.

8. The method of claim 3, wherein calculating the combined threat assessment score comprises performing a calculation based on one or more of the pricing assessment score, the magnitude assessment score, the presentation assessment score, and the category associated with the source profile.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more remediation steps of the remediation workflow include one or more of:

automatically sending a notification to a manufacturer of a monitored product;

automatically sending a notification to the product source requesting cessation of illicit activity; and

automatically generating a legal document for review by a manufacturer of a monitored product.

10. A system for detecting and eliminating unauthorized digital communications, the system comprising at least one computing device configured to:

build source profiles associated with a plurality of product sources, wherein building source profiles associated with a plurality of product sources comprises;

generating a set of search queries based on a set of product definitions;

executing the set of search queries to obtain a set of gathered resources;

creating a set of source profiles based on the set of gathered resources; and

updating the set of source profiles with information retrieved from the set of gathered resources using a set of parsing rules;

determine whether one or more aspects of a source profile of the set of source profiles exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds by calculating a presentation assessment score based on a comparison of brand information presented in the set of gathered resources used to create the source profile to brand information presentation guidelines identified in a product definition used to create the source profile; and

in response to determining that one or more aspects of the source profile exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds;

create a remediation workflow having one or more remediation steps; and

execute the remediation steps of the remediation workflow.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the brand information presentation guidelines include a specification of one or more of an approved image, a tagline, a trademark, a spelling check, a font, and a color.

12. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more computing devices are further configured to:

for the source profile of the set of source profiles;

calculate one or more of a category, a pricing assessment score, a magnitude assessment score, and a combined threat assessment score; and

wherein determining that one or more aspects of the source profile exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds includes determining that one or more of the category, the pricing assessment score, the magnitude assessment score, the presentation assessment score, or the channel protection score exceeds one or more predetermined remediation thresholds.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein calculating the pricing assessment score comprises comparing pricing information associated with the source profile to an expected pricing value.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein calculating the magnitude assessment score comprises comparing information indicative of sales volume associated with the source profile to a threshold volume value.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein calculating the presentation assessment score comprises causing brand information presented in gathered resources associated with the source profile to be presented to a manufacturer for manual review.

16. The system of claim 12, wherein calculating the category comprises assigning the source profile to a whitelist category, a greylist category, a blacklist category, or an unknown category based on information indicative of a product source associated with the source profile.

17. The system of claim 12, wherein calculating the combined threat assessment score comprises performing a calculation based on one or more of the pricing assessment score, the magnitude assessment score, the presentation assessment score, and the category associated with the source profile.

18. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more remediation steps of the remediation workflow include one or more of:

automatically sending a notification to a manufacturer of a monitored product;

automatically sending a notification to the product source requesting cessation of illicit activity; and

automatically generating a legal document for review by a manufacturer of a monitored product.

19. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by one or more processors of one or more computing devices, cause the one or more computing devices to perform actions for detecting and eliminating unauthorized digital communications, the actions comprising:

building source profiles associated with a plurality of product sources, wherein building source profiles associated with a plurality of product sources comprises;

generating a set of search queries based on a set of product definitions;

executing the set of search queries to obtain a set of gathered resources;

creating a set of source profiles based on the set of gathered resources; and

updating the set of source profiles with information retrieved from the set of gathered resources using a set of parsing rules;

determining whether one or more aspects of a source profile of the set of source profiles exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds by calculating a presentation assessment score based on a comparison of brand information presented in the set of gathered resources used to create the source profile to brand information presentation guidelines identified in a product definition used to create the source profile; and

in response to determining that one or more aspects of the source profile exceed one or more predetermined remediation thresholds;

creating a remediation workflow having one or more remediation steps; and

executing the remediation steps of the remediation workflow.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 19, wherein the brand information presentation guidelines include a specification of one or more of an approved image, a tagline, a trademark, a spelling check, a font, and a color.