Project Management Simulator

• US 20170068758A1
• Filed: 05/29/2014
• Published: 03/09/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 05/29/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Landmark Graphics Corporation (Halliburton Company)
• Original Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated (Halliburton Company)
• Inventors: CUTHBERT, Andrew John, GUINAN, Mary Anne, RAGHUNATHAN, Ramesh K.
• Application Number:
  US15/125,724
• Publication Number:
  US 20170068758A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 17/18 for evaluating statistical data , e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis forecasting specially adapted for a specific administrative, business or logistic context G06Q10/04
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/20 Design optimisation, verification or simulation optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/451 Execution arrangements for user interfaces
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0631 Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations

Abstract

A processor simulating a project management job receives through a GUI a subject matter (SME) selector indicating whether or not an SME has been selected. The processor receiving through the GUI a package selection for each of a plurality of package categories. The processor providing through the GUI a description of an event, the event being selected based on the package selections and a simulation stage, and descriptions of a plurality of options to respond to the event, wherein the plurality of options is based on the SME selector, the package selectors, and the simulation stage. The processor receiving through the GUI a selection of one of the plurality of options. The processor processing the option, the package selections, the SME selector, and the simulation stage to determine an outcome. The processor displaying the outcome on the GUI.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

a processor providing through a graphical user interface (GUI);

an identification of a subject matter expert (SME), and

an SME selector through which the SME can be selected;

the processor receiving through the GUI an SME selector indicating whether or not the SME has been selected;

the processor providing through the GUI a package selector for each of a plurality of package categories;

a processor receiving through the GUI a package selection for each of the plurality of package categories;

the processor providing through the GUI;

a description of an event, the event being selected based on the package selections and a simulation stage, and

descriptions of a plurality of options to respond to the event, wherein the plurality of options is based on the SME selector, the package selectors, and the simulation stage;

the processor receiving through the GUI a selection of one of the plurality of options;

the processor processing the option, the package selections, the SME selector, and the simulation stage to determine an outcome; and

the processor displaying the outcome on the GUI.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein:

the plurality of package categories comprises;

a pre-drill package category,

a top hole section package category.

an intermediate section package category, and

a reservoir section package category.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the package selector comprises a menu.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

the processor receiving through the GUI a tentative selection of one of the plurality of options, and

the processor providing through the GUI a description of the tentatively selected one of the plurality of options.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the outcome comprises a graph showing a days versus depth graph showing the depth that a well has reached on each day.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the outcome comprises a vertical section showing a lithography.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein selection of the event is based on a random variable in addition to the package selections and the simulation stage.

7. (canceled)

9. A non-transitory computer-readable medium, on which is recorded a computer program, the program comprising executable instructions that, when executed, cause a processor to perform a method comprising:

providing through a graphical user interface (GUI);

an identification of a subject matter expert (SME), and

an SME selector through which the SME can be selected;

receiving through the GUI an SME selector indicating whether or not the SME has been selected;

providing through the GUI a package selector for each of a plurality of package categories;

receiving through the GUI a package selection for each of the plurality of package categories;

providing through the GUI;

a description of an event, the event being selected based on the package selections and a simulation stage, and

descriptions of a plurality of options to respond to the event, wherein the plurality of options is based on the SME selector, the package selectors, and the simulation stage;

receiving through the GUI a selection of one of the plurality of options;

processing the option, the package selections, the SME selector, and the simulation stage to determine an outcome; and

displaying the outcome on the GUI.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein:

the plurality of package categories comprises;

a pre-drill package category,

a top hole section package category.

an intermediate section package category, and

a reservoir section package category.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein the package selector comprises a menu.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving through the GUI a tentative selection of one of the plurality of options, and

providing through the GUI a description of the tentatively selected one of the plurality of options.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein the outcome comprises a graph showing a days versus depth graph showing the depth that a well has reached on each day.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein the outcome comprises a vertical section showing a lithography.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 wherein the outcome comprises an analysis of the financial performance of the simulation given the SME selector, the package selections, and the selection of the one of the plurality of options.

16. (canceled)

17. A method comprising:

a processor executing a plurality of oil field service project management simulations, each execution comprising;

the processor providing through a graphical user interface (GUI);

an identification of a subject matter expert (SME), and

an SME selector through which the SME can be selected,

the processor receiving through the GUI an SME selector indicating whether or not the SME has been selected,

the processor providing through the GUI a package selector for each of a plurality of package categories,

a processor receiving through the GUI a package selection for each of the plurality of package categories,

the processor providing through the GUI;

a description of an event, the event being selected based on the package selections and a simulation stage, and

descriptions of a plurality of options to respond to the event, wherein the plurality of options is based on the SME selector, the package selectors, and the simulation stage,

the processor receiving through the GUI a selection of one of the plurality of options,

the processor processing the option, the package selections, the SME selector, and the simulation stage to determine an outcome,

the processor displaying the outcome on the GUI,

the processor storing the SME selector, the package selector for each of the package categories, the selection of the one of the plurality of options, and the outcome in one of a plurality of simulator execution packages;

the processor performing a statistical analysis of the plurality of simulator execution packages to produce a suggested SME selector, a suggested package selection, and a suggested option selection to achieve a desired result.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the statistical analysis comprises a Monte Carlo analysis.

19. The method of claim 17 further comprising:

using the suggested SME selector, the suggested package selection, and the suggested option selection to inform decision-making in a non-training oil field service project management situation.

20. The method of claim 17 further comprising:

using the suggested SME selector, the suggested package selection, and the suggested option selection to populate a knowledge base.

21. The method of claim 17 further comprising:

using the suggested SME selector, the suggested package selection, and the suggested option selection to guide future oil field service project management training.

22. The method of claim 17 wherein the desired result is one of maximum profit, minimum cost, and minimum time to perform the oil field service project.